Abstract:Since the mid-1960s, slightly more men than women have been present on this planet. In 2022, 4 billion males and 3.95 billion females were living worldwide, implying 50.4% of the world population is male and 49.6% female. By 2050, however, it is expected that the sex ratio will even out and, after 2050, females will outnumber males [1]. Currently, women already outnumber men in the older age groups because of the differences in mortality between men and women, with woman tending to live longer than men. Although females account for a significant proportion of the patient population, in the past women were excluded from participation in studies. Therefore, research data collected from men were generalized to women, despite the fact that disease symptoms and drug metabolism are different in women and men. The gap in female data resulted in longer times to diagnosis for women than for men, with more frequent misdiagnoses and women more often mistakenly discharged while having a serious medical event [2]. Although this gender gap is improving, it is still present [3]. But what about a gender gap in authorships? In this issue of Endoscopy , Elisabetta Mastrorocco et al. performed a systematic review to assess whether there is a gender gap in the authorship of scientific research in gastrointestinal journals and in the principal investigators [4] of ongoing research. "I hope that both this editorial and the systematic review written mostly by women will contribute to, stimulate, and encourage men and women to further close the gender authorship gap." A total of 4207 articles were included: 2205 US-based and 2002 European-based. First female authorship was found in 33.4% of the articles; senior female authorship in 21.6%. US-based journals showed a statistically significant lower percentage of first female authors, but not of senior female authors. In the analysis of single journals, they found the lowest percentage of first female authors to be in the endoscopy-related journals, namely Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (GIE) at 23% and Endoscopy at 25%. For senior female authorship, the lowest rate was found in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology at 9%, followed by Endoscopy and GIE, at 12.3% and 15%, respectively. There was more likelihood of publications having female authorship in the more clinically oriented topics, like hepatology, inflammatory bowel disease, and upper and lower gastrointestinal disease; however, even in these topics, the percentage of female senior authors remained significantly lower than the percentage of first female authors. Mastrorocco et al. also found a significant correlation between last and first female authorship. Where the last author was a woman, the first author was female in 51% of publications; when the last author was a man, this percentage came down to 28%. This correlation between last and first female authorship has also been found in other specialties, such as vascular surgery, transplantation surgery, and cardiology [4] [5] [6], while in infectious disease journals, the proportion of female editors appeared to influence the proportions of female last and first authors [7]. Remarkably, in most of the papers that have addressed the gender authorship gap, the first author has been a woman. This may be due to the fact that women recognize this gender gap and want to publish about it, or that the idea became apparent by men and asking women to dive into it to close the gap at the same time. The positive news is that overall there has been a slight increase in female first and last authorships over recent years, which may be a result of the increase in women in science and medicine. I hope that both this editorial and the systematic review written mostly by women – including first and last female authorship – being published in an endoscopy journal will contribute to, stimulate, and encourage men and women to further close the gender authorship gap. Article published online: 04 April 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

[Gender inequalities in authorship of the main Spanish medical journals in 2017]

Gender equity in the scientific nursing journals indexed in Journal Citation Reports: A cross-sectional study

Women occupying preferential authorship positions for articles in the journal Emergencias: an analysis of authorship during the last decade

The inclusion of the gender perspective in oncology research with Spanish participation

Gender inequalities in oral medicine and pathology research: Temporal trends of two decades

Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals

Trends in gender of authors of original research in oncology among major medical journals: a retrospective bibliometric study

Women in Radiology: A perspective from Spain

Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review

Scientific production in sexual and reproductive health and rights research according to gender and affiliation: An analysis of publications from 1972 to 2021

Gender influence on work satisfaction and leadership for medical oncologists: a survey of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM)

Academic medicine’s glass ceiling: Author’s gender in top three medical research journals impacts probability of future publication success

Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles

Gender gap in cardiothoracic surgery randomized controlled trial and post-hoc analysis of randomized controlled trial authorship from 2014 to 2020

Closing the gender authorship gap

Does diversity beget diversity? A scientometric analysis of over 150,000 studies and 49,000 authors published in high-impact medical journals between 2007 and 2022

Gender authorship in major American and European gastroenterology journals: the gap is still unfilled

Gender differences in publication in emergency medicine journals

Gender differences in faculty rank among academic physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gender Differences in Physical Activity and Health-Related Authorships Between 1950 and 2019

Gender imbalances among top-cited scientists across scientific disciplines over time through the analysis of nearly 5.8 million authors