Diagnostic yield of conventional and digital cephalometric images: a human cadaver study.

F. Gijbels,C. B. Serhal,Guy Willems,Hilde Bosmans,G. Sanderink,M. Persoons,Reinhilde Jacobs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/SJ/DMFR/4600585

2001-03-01

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of analogue and digital methods

E M Ongkosuwito,C Katsaros,M A van 't Hof,J C Bodegom,A M Kuijpers-Jagtman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/24.6.655

Abstract:The aim of this study was to compare the reproducibility of longitudinal cephalometric measurements between analogue and digital methods using two different resolutions. Cephalometric radiographs of 20 patients were selected at the start (T1) and end (T2) of treatment: 24 cephalometric variables were calculated at T1 and T2, and their increments (T2 - T1) were also evaluated. All measurements were performed twice by two observers. Quality of methods [analogue, digital: 300 and 600 dots per inch (DPI) resolution] was evaluated by comparing the reliability coefficients and the total error between the digital and analogue methods. The inter-observer agreement was good. The 300 DPI was comparable to the analogue method. The reproducibility for the variables was comparable, but mandibular incisor increments tended to show better results with the 300 DPI method, whereas skeletal jaw relationship increments were not reliable with either method. Maxillary incisor increments, however, were reliable with both methods. The 300 and 600 DPI resolutions were found to be comparable. Scanning of cephalometric radiographs at a resolution of 300 DPI is sufficient for clinical purposes and comparable to analogue cephalometrics. However, all methods were found to be poor in assessing skeletal jaw relationships longitudinally.
Pitfalls of Computed Tomography 3D Reconstruction Models in Cranial Nonmetric Analysis*

Barbara Bertoglio,Sofia Corradin,Annalisa Cappella,Debora Mazzarelli,Lucie Biehler‐Gomez,Carmelo Messina,Grazia Pozzi,Luca Maria Sconfienza,Francesco Sardanelli,Chiarella Sforza,Danilo De Angelis,Cristina Cattaneo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14535

2020-08-18

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Abstract:Many studies in the literature have highlighted the utility of virtual 3D databanks as a substitute for real skeletal collections and the important application of radiological records in personal identification. However, none have investigated the accuracy of virtual material compared to skeletal remains in nonmetric variant analysis using 3D models. The present study investigates the accuracy of 20 computed tomography (CT) 3D reconstruction models compared to the real crania, focusing on the quality of the reproduction of the real crania and the possibility to detect 29 dental/cranial morphological variations in 3D images. An interobserver analysis was performed to evaluate trait identification, number, position, and shape. Results demonstrate a false bone loss in 3D models in some cranial regions, specifically the maxillary and occipital bones in 85% and 20% of the samples. Additional analyses revealed several difficulties in the detection of cranial nonmetric traits in 3D models, resulting in incorrect identification in circa 70% of the traits. In particular, pitfalls included the detection of erroneous position, error in presence/absence rates, in number, and in shape. The lowest percentages of correct evaluations were found in traits localized in the lateral side of the cranium and for the infraorbital suture, mastoid foramen, and crenulation. The present study highlights important pitfalls in CT scan when compared with the real crania for nonmetric analysis. This may have crucial consequences in cases where 3D databanks are used as a source of reference population data for nonmetric traits and pathologies and during bone‐CT comparisons for identification purposes.

medicine, legal
The Effect of Image Count on Accuracy in Digital Measurements in Dentistry

Neslihan Güntekin,Aslı Çiftçi,Mehmet Gözen,Sema Ateşalp İleri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192122

IF: 3.6

2024-09-26

Diagnostics

Abstract:Objective: This study investigated how the number of images collected for digital measurements in dentistry affects accuracy compared with traditional methods. Methods: A Frasaco maxillary model was scanned using a SHINING 3D AutoScan-DS-MIX dental 3D scanner to create an STL file. The maxilla was molded 10 times using polyvinyl siloxane (Zhermack Elite HD+) to produce plaster models, which were scanned with the same reference scanner to generate 10 STL files. The Frasaco model was scanned 10 times, capturing images in intervals of 800–1000, 1000–1200, and 1200–1500 using a 3Shape TRIOS 3 intraoral scanner, creating additional STL files. These were analyzed with reverse engineering software. Results: The most accurate measurements were obtained using 1200–1500 images. Conventional impression techniques performed significantly worse. There was a significant difference between the groups Digital 1200–1500 and Plaster (p < 0.001) and between Digital 800–1000 and Plaster (p = 0.007). No significant difference was found when the digital groups were compared among themselves. There was also no significant difference between the Plaster and Digital 1000–1200 groups. To compare precision values that were normally distributed across three or more methods, a one-way ANOVA was used. Trueness values that were not normally distributed with three or more methods were compared employing the Kruskal–Wallis test. Conclusions: Different image counts affect digital measurement accuracy. The most accurate measurements were obtained when collecting 1200–1500 images. Conventional impression techniques were shown to perform significantly worse than digital impression.

medicine, general & internal
Comparative Study of Cephalometric Measurements Using 3 Imaging Modalities.

Juan Wen,Shu Liu,Xiao Ye,Xiaoqiu Xie,Jialing Li,Huang Li,Li Mei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2017.07.030

2017-01-01

Abstract:Background. The authors conducted a study to compare 2-dimensional (2D) lateral cephalometric radiography (LCR), 2D cone-beam computer tomographic (CBCT)-generated cephalogram and 3-dimensional (3D) CBCT for assessing cephalometric measurements. Methods. The authors took 2D LCR, 2D CBCT-generated cephalogram, and 3D CBCT images involving 60 participants. They obtained 11 angular and 11 linear measurements for all images. They used 1-way analysis of variance and the Fisher least significant difference test for statistical comparisons. The authors used Pearson correlation and Pearson chi(2) test to assess the relationship of these imaging modalities for vertical cephalometric analyses. Results. Significant differences existed between the 2D cephalograms (LCR and CBCT-generated cephalogram) and the 3D CBCT in 2 angular measurements (maxillary first incisor-nasion (N) point A [A] and mandibular first incisor-N point B (B) (P = .027 and P <. 001, respectively) and 5 linear measurements (N menton[Me]/sella gonion [Go], condylion [Co]A, Co gnathion, Go-Me and anterior nasal spine-posterior nasal spine) (P < .004). These measurement values with significant differences were generally greater (approximately 5 degrees for angular measurements and 10 millimeters for linear measurements) on the 3D CBCT scans than on the 2D cephalograms. No significant difference was found between the 2 2D cephalograms (P > .164). No significant difference was found among the 3 imaging modalities for the vertical cephalometric analyses (P > .466). Conclusions. Significant differences existed between the 2D cephalograms (LCR and CBCT-generated cephalogram) and the 3D CBCT scans in 2 angular and 5 linear measurements. The 2 2D cephalograms were similar for cephalometric measurements. The 3 imaging modalities had no significant difference for the vertical cephalometric analyses. CBCT might not add value for every orthodontic situation.
The accuracy (trueness and precision) of Bellus3DARC-7 and an in-vivo analysis of intra and inter-examiner reliability of digital and manual anthropometry

Jenny Doan,Nessa Finlay,Amy Lee,Thomas Ethell,Narayan Gandedkar,Mehmet Ali Darendeliler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2023-0015

2023-01-01

Australasian Orthodontic Journal

Abstract:Abstract Background Three dimensional (3D) facial imaging is becoming a popular method of facial analysis and a means of anthropometry. There is potential for 3D imaging to provide enough diagnostic information to parallel lateral cephalograms, which could, in time, reduce the need for radiation exposure to patients. The present study aimed to assess the accuracy of the Bellus3D ARC-7 (Bellus) camera by comparing the measurements of soft tissue facial landmarks obtained from Bellus scans to the measurements taken using Vernier callipers. Method Nineteen anatomical points were located on four subjects using a standard black ballpoint pen on a white, circular sticker. Distances were measured between these points using digital callipers, with the subject in a resting pose. This was repeated twice by two examiners for each subject. Two examiners subsequently performed measurements of each subject in a smiling pose. Following landmark identification, images were captured under standard conditions, using the Bellus camera. The same measurements were obtained digitally, repeated twice by two examiners for each subject in both resting and smiling poses. Results There was high precision in repeated measurements on the digital models, with less than 1.5 mm deviation between measurements. Both intra-examiner and inter-examiner reproducibility were greater following the digital measurements compared to manual measurements, with 100% of the digital measurements of landmarks falling within a set threshold deviation of ≤1.5 mm. When comparing the manual and digital measurements, the greatest deviations (>1.0 mm) occurred in regions around the cheeks and lower third of the face, while the measurements for the ears and midline structures (forehead and nose bridge) deviated the least (≤1.0 mm). This was demonstrated in models at rest and smiling. Conclusions The Bellus system produced an accurate and true image of the face from which reproducible measurements can be made within and between examiners. 3D facial images from the Bellus3D ARC-7 system were comparable to direct anthropometry, therefore the use of 3D facial scanning in orthodontics for diagnosis and treatment planning appears promising.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
Tooth segmentation by low-dose CBCT for orthodontic treatment planning : Explorative ex vivo validation

Maurice Ruetters,Holger Gehrig,Sinclair Awounvo,Ti-Sun Kim,Sara Doll,Korallia Alexandrou,Anna Felten,Christopher Lux,Sinan Sen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00558-7

2024-10-24

Abstract:Purpose: Three-dimensional imaging has become an increasingly important component of orthodontics. Associated with this, however, is a higher radiation exposure for patients. New cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices have been developed that can provide low-dose CBCT (LD-CBCT). We hypothesized that LD-CBCT is as precise and reproducible as standard high-dose CBCT (HD-CBCT) in segmenting roots and crowns as well as measuring tooth length. Methods: HD-CBCT and LD-CBCT scans were taken of four human cadaveric heads. Thirty single-rooted teeth were segmented twice by one investigator. The length of each tooth was also measured. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was calculated to assess the agreement of HD-CBCT and LD-CBCT measurements and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess intrarater reliability. Analyses were supported by Bland-Altman plots. Results: Volume measurements obtained using HD-CBCT were significantly higher than those obtained using LD-CBCT (p < 0.001). CCC was 0.975 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.956-0.986) indicating excellent agreement between the two modalities. Intrarater reliability between the two sets of LD-CBCT and HD-CBCT volume measurements was excellent (ICC = 0.998, 95%CI = 0.995-0.999 [HD-CBCT], ICC = 0.997, 95%CI = 0.992-0.998 [LD-CBCT]). CCC for tooth length measurements was 0.991 (95% CI = 0.983-0.995), indicating excellent agreement between HD-CBCT and LD-CBCT. Intrarater reliabilities between the two sets of tooth length measurements were also excellent for both methods (ICC = 0.998, 95%CI = 0.995-0.999 [HD-CBCT], ICC = 0.997, 95%CI = 0.992-0.998 [LD-CBCT]). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this experimental setting, LD-CBCT is as valid as HD-CBCT for measuring tooth length. Regarding the volume differences, in vivo studies are required to determine their clinical relevance.
Reliability and accuracy of Artificial intelligence-based software for cephalometric diagnosis. A diagnostic study

Jean-Philippe Mercier,Cecilia Rossi,Iván Nieto Sanchez,Inés Díaz Renovales,Patricia Martín-Palomino Sahagún,Laura Templier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05097-6

2024-10-29

BMC Oral Health

Abstract:Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing cephalometric diagnosis in orthodontics, streamlining the patient assessments. This study aimed to assess the reliability, accuracy, and time consumption of artificial intelligence (AI)-based software compared to a conventional digital cephalometric analysis method on 2D lateral cephalogram.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
Diagnostic concordance between skeletal cephalometrics, radiograph-based soft-tissue cephalometrics, and photograph-based soft-tissue cephalometrics

Riccardo Nucera,Antonino Lo Giudice,Mirea Bellocchio,Paola Spinuzza,Alberto Caprioglio,Giancarlo Cordasco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjw072

2016-12-08

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the diagnostic concordance between skeletal cephalometrics and soft-tissue cephalometrics in identifying facial lower third characteristics.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared a skeletal cephalometric analysis (SCA) to a soft-tissue analysis performed on cephalometric radiographs (rSTCA) and to one performed on profile photograph (pSTCA). Ninety-six pre-treatment digital lateral cephalometric radiographs and 96 digital profile photographs were randomly selected for this study (patients' mean age: 18.33, SD: 3.38, age range: 14-29). Inclusion criteria were as follows: no skeletal asymmetry, well-aligned upper and lower dental arches, no history of orthodontic treatment, prosthodontic treatment, facial surgery and trauma, patient's age between 14 and 30 years, high-resolution images, exams taken with natural head position. Kruskas-Wallis and post hoc pairwise comparisons tests were used to find differences among the considered cephalometric methods. The diagnostic performance of the three methods was also assessed using the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.RESULTS: Significant differences were found between SCA and rSTCA and between SCA and pSTCA in defining sagittal and vertical facial lower third characteristics (P < 0.05). No differences were found between rSTCA and pSTCA (P > 0.05) for the same facial characteristics. For each parameters investigated, pSTCA showed an area under the curve much closer to the perfect value of 1.00.CONCLUSION: Poor diagnostic concordance was found between SCA and rSTCA and between SCA and pSTCA. pSTCA is a reliable method for evaluating the soft-tissue profile characteristics compared to that performed on cephalograms.
Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization

Jan-Frederik Güth,Cornelius Runkel,Florian Beuer,Michael Stimmelmayr,Daniel Edelhoff,Christine Keul

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1902-4

2016-07-12

Clinical Oral Investigations

Abstract:ObjectivesDirect and indirect digitalization offer two options for computer-aided design (CAD)/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAM)-generated restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of different intraoral scanners and compare them to the process of indirect digitalization.Material and methodA titanium testing model was directly digitized 12 times with each intraoral scanner: (1) CS 3500 (CS), (2) Zfx Intrascan (ZFX), (3) CEREC AC Bluecam (BLU), (4) CEREC AC Omnicam (OC) and (5) True Definition (TD). As control, 12 polyether impressions were taken and the referring plaster casts were digitized indirectly with the D-810 laboratory scanner (CON). The accuracy (trueness/precision) of the datasets was evaluated by an analysing software (Geomagic Qualify 12.1) using a “best fit alignment” of the datasets with a highly accurate reference dataset of the testing model, received from industrial computed tomography.ResultsDirect digitalization using the TD showed the significant highest overall “trueness”, followed by CS. Both performed better than CON. BLU, ZFX and OC showed higher differences from the reference dataset than CON. Regarding the overall “precision”, the CS 3500 intraoral scanner and the True Definition showed the best performance. CON, BLU and OC resulted in significantly higher precision than ZFX did.ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this in vitro study, the accuracy of the ascertained datasets was dependent on the scanning system. The direct digitalization was not superior to indirect digitalization for all tested systems.Clinical relevanceRegarding the accuracy, all tested intraoral scanning technologies seem to be able to reproduce a single quadrant within clinical acceptable accuracy. However, differences were detected between the tested systems.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
Proceeding of the International Digital Dentistry Society World Congress, Baden Baden 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0954-7

2019-12-01

BMC Oral Health

Abstract: Background: Biomodeling in integration with digital imaging techniques such as intra-oral scanning and cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) is being commonly practiced in dental implantology for pre-operative treatment planning, clinical teaching and evaluating bone density and drilling techniques. The objective of following study was to assess the quantitative accuracy of CBCT-derived mandibular biomodels.Methods: A CBCT dataset was segmented and mandible was isolated. Fifteen mandibular biomodels were fabricated utilizing multijet (MJ=4), digital light processing (DLP=4), stereolithography (SLA=2), fused deposition modeling (FDM=2), colorjet (CJ=2) and selective laser sintering (LS=1) based high-end commercial and in-house printers. Printed models were superimposed onto the original mandible for comparing surface accuracy. A part comparison analysis with color-coded map was carried out for evaluating the difference between each printed and original model surface.Results: MJ technology showed least amount of error associated with both erupted and impacted teeth. Highest bony surface accuracy was achieved with SLA and LS based biomodels. Trabecular structures were most accurately printed with MJ printers. FDM technology had the highest overall absolute mean error associated with both teeth and bone. No significant differences were observed between each surface of original and printed models.Conclusions: Overall biomodels were able to well replicate skeletal and dental anatomical surfaces. However, some models showed shortcomings in relation to depicting trabecular architecture which might influence bone density for drilling bone and placing dental implants. Background. On the base of the state of the art on the applications of augmented reality (AR) in dentistry from previous studies a new system was developed and in vivo tested with Institutional Review Board approval of the Ethics Committee of Policlinico of Milan (n. 421). The purpose of the new system is to provide a new light, portable hand-held smart device which provides a compound superimposed dynamic vision of the anatomical structures of the patient, radiologic exams and digitally positioned medical devices for AR-guided operations.Methods. CBCT data and the .stl files of miniscrews (TADs), (Leone, Firenze, Italy), were imported in a dicom viewer, placed in the correct position and fixed, then exported to .stl format separately. The digital images were uploaded to a server and opened with a smart, light hand-held hardware. The hardware was placed in front of the patient placed in N.H.P and the new software was started. Superimposition was regulated with pinch gesture on the touch screen until correct positioning of the frontal teeth of the patient, the opacity of digital images were regulated with a function of the software. The superimposition was automatically stabilized by a function of the software using software development kit (SDK) engines. Tads were placed under the guide of the compound vision. Time measurements were taken on superimposition by different operators and the error was calculated with a digital caliper.Results. The new system provided effectively a dynamic functional compound superimposition of anatomical structures and previously digitally placed medical devices. The error in the positioning of the TADs was calculated as < of 0.3 mm for both while time measurements of the superimposition session were less than 5 minutes for each session.Conclusions. The new proposed system effectively provides a simple and light dynamic AR superimposition of digital data on a surgical site providing the clinician a compound vision of anatomical structures. The TADs were placed with AR assisted surgery with a acceptable error, further in vivo and in vitro studies are needed. Purpose. Modern implantology has been focused on the peri-implant mucosa maturation patterns, with particular attention on the frontal area, aiming to obtain an optimal aesthetic result. The purpose of the following study is to analyze height/width proportion in the peri-implant buccal tissues between two different types of connection: Flat to Flat and Magic Five Cone Morse Connection (Anyridge®).Methods. The present study analyzes 294 implants, the measurements were done with digital 3D technology at one year from the provisional crown placement. Every single implant was matched with its own Scan Body and was scanned with 3Shape D700, in order to obtain a tridimensional section of the model. Peri-implant measurements included the width of the peri-implant mucosa (HV), calculated from the implant connection to the buccal mucosa surface on a line perpendicular to the main implant axis. For the height of the peri-implant tissues (VV), we considered as well, the same geometrical line as the apical point of the measure to -Abstract Truncated-

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
Assessing AudaxCeph®'s cephalometric tracing technology versus a semi-automated approach for analyzing severe Class II and Class III skeletons

Katherine O'Friel,Andrew Chapple,Richard Ballard,Paul Armbruster

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100926

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and precision of the AudaxCeph® fully automated software in identifying cephalometric landmarks on lateral cephalograms of Class II and Class III skeletal relationships, comparing its performance against experienced orthodontists using manual tracing within the same software environment. Material and methods: Sixty cephalograms depicting severe Class II or Class III skeletal discrepancies were assessed by two board-certified orthodontists and AudaxCeph®'s artificial intelligence automatic tracing software. Among these, 40 cases were classified as Class II and 20 as Class III. An X-Y axis was established at the bottom left corner of each cephalogram, and subsequent X and Y coordinates for the landmarks were exported to Excel. Thirteen cephalometric landmarks were identified and used for comparing manual and automatic tracing methods, with no alteration of landmark positions post-tracing. Measures of the X coordinate, Y coordinate, and radial distance for each landmark were compared using t-tests for equivalence with a 2mm margin, both against AudaxCeph®'s positions and intra-operator reliability. Results: Analysis revealed that while most operator measurements closely approximated AudaxCeph® values, discrepancies exceeding 2mm were notable at Gonion and Porion landmarks. Slight variability was noted in one instance during intra-examiner evaluation at the Gonion landmark. Conclusions: This study concludes that AudaxCeph®'s artificial intelligence-driven automatic tracing of cephalograms offers a reliable and accurate method for orthodontic treatment planning across various skeletal types and severities. On average, it exhibits minimal discrepancies exceeding 2mm compared to manual operators, with notable variations observed primarily at the Gonion and Porion landmarks. While AudaxCeph® is an acceptable tool for cephalometric landmark location, it's accuracy still require the practitioner to verify some less reliable landmark locations.
CPCT image combination algorithm for 3D cephalometry

Pavlo Burlakov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32345/usmyj.1(144).2024.92-97

2024-03-28

Abstract:3D cefalometry as a method of diagnosis of orthodontic patients for treatment planning has many advantages over the classical adopted as the "gold standard" 2D, but its main disadvantage is the large retgenological load on the patient when conducting MSCT or CBCT of a large field of vision (FOV 25*25 cm). To develop an ALARA principle (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) diagnostic protocol and reduce the dose-area product (DAP) per patient during 3D orthodontic diagnostics (cephalometry) by combining CPCT images taken on a scanner with a smaller field of vision (FOV). Methods : CBCT images of the upper and lower jaw and temporo mandibular joints of the middle patients who sought dental assistance at the «Expir» clinic. Mimics Medical software (Materialise, Belgium) Based on our developed and patented method of cephalometric analysis DVB, it has been shown that it is possible to perform a cephalometry analysis and to plan orthodontic treatment on combined CBCT images and thus reduce the DAP for the patient to 1532 mGr*cm2. The digital approach to the improvement of diagnostic methods, developed in accordance with the ALARA principles, allows to improve the quality of orthodontic services and reduce the X-ray load on patients.
Human gastrointestinal cancer grown in nude mice used to test new chemotherapeutic agents.

O. Fodstad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000402313

1979-07-01

Abstract:
Comparison of linear measurements between CBCT orthogonally synthesized cephalograms and conventional cephalograms.

S Yang,D G Liu,Y Gu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140024

2014-01-01

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Abstract:Objectives: The purposes of the study are to investigate the consistency of linear measurements between CBCT orthogonally synthesized cephalograms and conventional cephalograms and to evaluate the influence of different magnifications on these comparisons based on a simulation algorithm. Methods: Conventional cephalograms and CBCT scans were taken on 12 dry skulls with spherical metal markers. Orthogonally synthesized cephalograms were created from CBCT data. Linear parameters on both cephalograms were measured via Photoshop CS v. 5.0 (Adobe (R) Systems, San Jose, CA), named measurement group (MG). Bland-Altman analysis was utilized to assess the agreement of two imaging modalities. Reproducibility was investigated using paired t-test. By a specific mathematical programme "cepha", corresponding linear parameters [mandibular corpus length (Go-Me), mandibular ramus length (Co-Go), posterior facial height (Go-S)] on these two types of cephalograms were calculated, named simulation group (SG). Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement between MG and SG. Simulated linear measurements with varying magnifications were generated based on "cepha" as well. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement of simulated measurements between two modalities. Results: Bland-Altman analysis suggested the agreement between measurements on conventional cephalograms and orthogonally synthesized cephalograms, with a mean bias of 0.47 mm. Comparison between MG and SG showed that the difference did not reach clinical significance. The consistency between simulated measurements of both modalities with four different magnifications was demonstrated. Conclusions: Normative data of conventional cephalograms could be used for CBCT orthogonally synthesized cephalograms during this transitional period.
Omitting types for algebraizable extensions of first order logic

T. Ahmed

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3166/jancl.15.465-489

Abstract:We prove an Omitting Types Theorem for certain algebraizable extensions of first order logic without equality studied in [SAI 00] and [SAY 04]. This is done by proving a representation theorem preserving given countable sets of infinite meets for certain reducts of ω- dimensional polyadic algebras, the so-called G polyadic algebras (Theorem 5). Here G is a special subsemigroup of (ω, ω o) that specifies the signature of the algebras in question. We state and prove an independence result connecting our representation theorem to Martin's axiom (Theorem 6). Also we show that the countable atomic G polyadic algebras are completely representable (Corollary 16) contrasting results on cylindric algebras. Several related results are surveyed.
Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Julie Hendrickx,Rellyca Sola Gracea,Michiel Vanheers,Nicolas Winderickx,Flavia Preda,Sohaib Shujaat,Reinhilde Jacobs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjae029

2024-08-01

Abstract:Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the accuracy and efficiency of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven automated landmark detection for cephalometric analysis on two-dimensional (2D) lateral cephalograms and three-dimensional (3D) cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images. Search methods: An electronic search was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and grey literature with search timeline extending up to January 2024. Selection criteria: Studies that employed AI for 2D or 3D cephalometric landmark detection were included. Data collection and analysis: The selection of studies, data extraction, and quality assessment of the included studies were performed independently by two reviewers. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the 2D landmarks identification based on both mean radial error and standard error. Results: Following the removal of duplicates, title and abstract screening, and full-text reading, 34 publications were selected. Amongst these, 27 studies evaluated the accuracy of AI-driven automated landmarking on 2D lateral cephalograms, while 7 studies involved 3D-CBCT images. A meta-analysis, based on the success detection rate of landmark placement on 2D images, revealed that the error was below the clinically acceptable threshold of 2 mm (1.39 mm; 95% confidence interval: 0.85-1.92 mm). For 3D images, meta-analysis could not be conducted due to significant heterogeneity amongst the study designs. However, qualitative synthesis indicated that the mean error of landmark detection on 3D images ranged from 1.0 to 5.8 mm. Both automated 2D and 3D landmarking proved to be time-efficient, taking less than 1 min. Most studies exhibited a high risk of bias in data selection (n = 27) and reference standard (n = 29). Conclusion: The performance of AI-driven cephalometric landmark detection on both 2D cephalograms and 3D-CBCT images showed potential in terms of accuracy and time efficiency. However, the generalizability and robustness of these AI systems could benefit from further improvement. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42022328800.
Comparative Analysis of 3D Cephalometry Provided with Artificial Intelligence and Manual Tracing

Zurab Khabadze,Oleg Mordanov,Ekaterina Shilyaeva

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14222524

IF: 3.6

2024-11-13

Diagnostics

Abstract:Objectives: To compare 3D cephalometric analysis performed using AI with that conducted manually by a specialist orthodontist. Methods: The CBCT scans (a field of view of 15 × 15 cm) used in the study were obtained from 30 consecutive patients, aged 18 to 50. The 3D cephalometric analysis was conducted using two methods. The first method involved manual tracing performed with the Invivo 6 software (Anatomage Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The second method involved using AI for cephalometric measurements as part of an orthodontic report generated by the Diagnocat system (Diagnocat Ltd., San Francisco, CA, USA). Results: A statistically significant difference within one standard deviation of the parameter was found in the following measurements: SNA, SNB, and the left interincisal angle. Statistically significant differences within two standard deviations were noted in the following measurements: the right and left gonial angles, the left upper incisor, and the right lower incisor. No statistically significant differences were observed beyond two standard deviations. Conclusions: AI in the form of Diagnocat proved to be effective in assessing the mandibular growth direction, defining the skeletal class, and estimating the overbite, overjet, and Wits parameter.

medicine, general & internal
Precision of Cephalometric Landmark Identification from Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

LIU Yi,ZHAO Jianhui,DING Yun,XU Tianmin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5760.2010.02.001

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective In this study, we compared the precision of landmark identification using cephalograms from cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) volumes and conventional lateral cephalograms (Ceph). Methods Twenty pre-orthodontic patients were radiographed with conventional Ceph and CBCT techniques. CBCT data was uploaded into InvivoDental software 5.0 to generate cephalograms(CCB). Three observers plotted 23 landmarks using computer displays of CCB and Ceph views during separate sessions. Absolute differences between CCB and Ceph of all observers were measured. The absolute difference between each observer was also measured. ANOVA and paired t tests were used to analyze variability differences. Results The difference of landmark identification between CCB and Ceph were significant at P＜0.05 calculations. 8 landmarks variability was statistically greater than Ceph views. The variability of CCB for each observer was consistently greater than in Ceph. The overall correlation of CCB and Ceph measurements was excellent at 0.99.Conclusions The CCB displays of CBCT volume images provide generally more precise identification than Ceph. More precise location of basion, porion, orbitale, ANS, A point, Gonion and tooth apex overcomes the problem of superimposition of these bilateral landmarks seen in Ceph. Greater variability of certain landmarks is probably related to inadequate definition of the landmarks in the third dimension.
Implementation of diffractive optical element in four-wave mixing scheme for ex situ characterization of hydride vapor phase epitaxy-grown GaN layers.

K. Jarašiūnas,R. Aleksieju̅nas,T. Malinauskas,V. Gudelis,T. Tamulevičius,S. Tamulevičius,A. Guobienė,A. Usikov,V. Dmitriev,H. Gerritsen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2712788

IF: 1.6

2007-03-09

Review of Scientific Instruments

Abstract:A holographic beam splitter has been integrated into a picosecond four-wave mixing (FWM) scheme. This modification significantly simplified the procedure of dynamic grating recording, thus making the FWM technique an easy-to-use tool for the holographic characterization of wide band gap materials. The novel FWM scheme was applied for characterization of hydride vapor phase epitaxy-grown undoped GaN layers of different thickness. It allowed the determination of carrier lifetime, diffusion coefficient, and carrier diffusion length by optical means, as well as the study of carrier recombination peculiarities with respect to dislocation and excess carrier density.
Comparative Evaluation of Digitization of Diagnostic Dental Cast (Plaster) Models Using Different Scanning Technologies

Aalaa Emara,Neha Sharma,Florian S. Halbeisen,Bilal Msallem,Florian M. Thieringer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8030079

2020-08-02

Dentistry Journal

Abstract:Rapidly developing digital dental technologies have substantially simplified the documentation of plaster dental models. The large variety of available scanners with varying degrees of accuracy and cost, however, makes the purchase decision difficult. This study assessed the digitization accuracy of a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and an intraoral scanner (IOS), as compared to a desktop optical scanner (OS). Ten plaster dental models were digitized three times (n = 30) with each scanner. The generated STL files were cross-compared, and the RMS values were calculated. Conclusions were drawn about the accuracy with respect to precision and trueness levels. The precision of the CBCT scanner was similar to the desktop OS reference, which both had a median deviation of 0.04 mm. The IOS had statistically significantly higher deviation compared to the reference OS, with a median deviation of 0.18 mm. The trueness values of the CBCT was also better than that of IOS—median differences of 0.14 and 0.17 mm, respectively. We conclude that the tested CBCT scanner is a highly accurate and user-friendly scanner for model digitization, and therefore a valuable alternative to the OS. The tested IOS was generally of lower accuracy, but it can still be used for plaster dental model digitization.

Diagnostic yield of conventional and digital cephalometric images: a human cadaver study.

The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of analogue and digital methods

Pitfalls of Computed Tomography 3D Reconstruction Models in Cranial Nonmetric Analysis*

The Effect of Image Count on Accuracy in Digital Measurements in Dentistry

Comparative Study of Cephalometric Measurements Using 3 Imaging Modalities.

The accuracy (trueness and precision) of Bellus3DARC-7 and an in-vivo analysis of intra and inter-examiner reliability of digital and manual anthropometry

Tooth segmentation by low-dose CBCT for orthodontic treatment planning : Explorative ex vivo validation

Reliability and accuracy of Artificial intelligence-based software for cephalometric diagnosis. A diagnostic study

Diagnostic concordance between skeletal cephalometrics, radiograph-based soft-tissue cephalometrics, and photograph-based soft-tissue cephalometrics

Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization

Proceeding of the International Digital Dentistry Society World Congress, Baden Baden 2019

Assessing AudaxCeph®'s cephalometric tracing technology versus a semi-automated approach for analyzing severe Class II and Class III skeletons

CPCT image combination algorithm for 3D cephalometry

Human gastrointestinal cancer grown in nude mice used to test new chemotherapeutic agents.

Comparison of linear measurements between CBCT orthogonally synthesized cephalograms and conventional cephalograms.

Omitting types for algebraizable extensions of first order logic

Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparative Analysis of 3D Cephalometry Provided with Artificial Intelligence and Manual Tracing

Precision of Cephalometric Landmark Identification from Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Implementation of diffractive optical element in four-wave mixing scheme for ex situ characterization of hydride vapor phase epitaxy-grown GaN layers.

Comparative Evaluation of Digitization of Diagnostic Dental Cast (Plaster) Models Using Different Scanning Technologies