Abstract:Embodiment theory proposes that knowledge is grounded in sensorimotor systems, and that learning can be facilitated to the extent that lessons can be mapped to these systems. This study with 109 college-age participants addresses two overarching questions: (a) how are immediate and delayed learning gains affected by the degree to which a lesson is embodied, and (b) how do the affordances of three different educational platforms affect immediate and delayed learning? Six 50 min-long lessons on centripetal force were created. The first factor was the degree of embodiment with two levels: (1) low and (2) high. The second factor was platform with three levels: (1) a large scale "mixed reality" immersive environment containing both digital and hands-on components called SMALLab, (2) an interactive whiteboard system, and (3) a mouse-driven desktop computer. Pre-tests, post-tests, and 1-week follow-up (retention or delayed learning gains) tests were administered resulting in a 2 × 3 × 3 design. Two knowledge subtests were analyzed, one that relied on more declarative knowledge and one that relied on more generative knowledge, e.g., hand-drawing vectors. Regardless of condition, participants made significant immediate learning gains from pre-test to post-test. There were no significant main effects or interactions due to platform or embodiment on immediate learning. However, from post-test to follow-up the level of embodiment interacted significantly with time, such that participants in the high embodiment conditions performed better on the subtest devoted to generative knowledge questions. We posit that better retention of certain types of knowledge can be seen over time when more embodiment is present during the encoding phase. This sort of retention may not appear on more traditional factual/declarative tests. Educational technology designers should consider using more sensorimotor feedback and gestural congruency when designing and opportunities for instructor professional development need to be provided as well.

The role of embodied cognition for transforming learning

Translating Embodied Cognition for Embodied Learning in the Classroom

Embodiment of Cognition

Learning and Embodied Cognition: A Review and Proposal

The Future of Embodied Design for Mathematics Teaching and Learning

Principles of embodied pedagogy: The role of the drama educator in transforming student understanding through a collaborative and embodied aesthetic practice

Embodied Cognition in Education: Possibilities and Limitations of Hybrid Representations

A Review of Embodied Learning Research and its Implications for Information Teaching Practice

Embodied science and mixed reality: How gesture and motion capture affect physics education

Embodied Cognition, Science Education, and Visuospatial Processing

Embodied Learning

Embodied cognition and STEM learning: overview of a topical collection in CR:PI

Research Avenues Supporting Embodied Cognition in Learning and Instruction

Physical Education and Embodied Learning: A Review

Learning and expertise with scientific external representations: an embodied and extended cognition model

Teaching with embodied learning technologies for mathematics: responsive teaching for embodied learning

On the Education About/of Radical Embodied Cognition

Principles for embodied learning approaches

Embodied learning: introducing a taxonomy based on bodily engagement and task integration

Embodied Learning: Why at School the Mind Needs the Body

Effects of Embodied Learning and Digital Platform on the Retention of Physics Content: Centripetal Force