Defining pre-emptive living kidney donor transplantation as a quality indicator

Carol Wang,Amit X Garg,Bin Luo,S Joseph Kim,Gregory Knoll,Seychelle Yohanna,Darin Treleaven,Susan McKenzie,Jane Ip,Rebecca Cooper,Lori Elliott,Kyla L Naylor,Amit X. Garg,S. Joseph Kim,Kyla L. Naylor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2024.02.017
IF: 9.369
2024-02-01
American Journal of Transplantation
Abstract:Quality indicators in kidney transplants are needed to identify care gaps and improve access to transplants. We used linked administrative health care databases to examine multiple ways of defining pre-emptive living donor kidney transplants, including different patient cohorts and censoring definitions. We included adults from Ontario, Canada with advanced chronic kidney disease between January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. We created 4 unique incident patient cohorts, varying the eligibility by the risk of progression to kidney failure and whether individuals had a recorded contraindication to kidney transplant (eg, home oxygen use). We explored the effect of 4 censoring event definitions. Across the 4 cohorts, size varied substantially from 20 663 to 9598 patients, with the largest reduction (a 43% reduction) occurring when we excluded patients with ≥1 recorded contraindication to kidney transplantation. The incidence rate (per 100 person-years) of pre-emptive living donor kidney transplant varied across cohorts from 1.02 (95% CI: 0.91-1.14) for our most inclusive cohort to 2.21 (95% CI: 1.96-2.49) for the most restrictive cohort. Our methods can serve as a framework for developing other quality indicators in kidney transplantation and monitoring and improving access to pre-emptive living donor kidney transplants in health care systems.
surgery,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?