Physician Preferences when Selecting Candidates for Lower-Quality Kidney Offers

Juan M Gonzalez Sepulveda,Sanjay Mehrotra,Jui-Chen Yang,Karolina J Schantz,Yolanda Becker,Richard Formica,Daniela P Ladner,Dixon Kaufman,John Friedewald,Juan M. Gonzalez Sepulveda,Karolina J. Schantz,Daniela P. Ladner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000000000000302
IF: 10.6233
2023-09-20
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Abstract:Background In the US, over 50% of kidneys in the lowest 15% quality range (those with kidney donor profile index>85) are discarded. Studies suggest that utilizing more of these kidneys could benefit patients waiting for a transplant. This study assesses the tradeoffs physicians make when selecting recipients for lower quality kidneys. Methods A discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was administered to surgeons and nephrologists in the US who are involved in kidney acceptance decisions. The DCE presented kidneys in terms of kidney donor profile index (KDPI), expected cold ischemia time, donor age, pump parameters, serum creatinine levels, glomerulosclerosis, donor diabetes status and whether donation was made after circulatory death. Candidate characteristics included recipients’ age, diabetes history, time on dialysis, ejection fraction, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch, calculated panel reactive antibody (CPRA), and Karnofsky performance score. Regression analysis was used to estimate acceptability weights associated with kidney and recipient characteristics. Results 108 physicians completed the DCE. The likelihood of acceptance decreased significantly with deterioration of kidney quality, expected cold ischemia time at transplantation, and missing biopsy and pump information. Acceptance was prioritized for patients who were higher on the waiting list, younger recipients, those who have been less time on dialysis, and those without a history of diabetes. Performance status (Karnofsky score) and CPRA also had a statistically-significant but smaller association. Finally, ejection fraction had a marginally-significant association and HLA match had no significant association with the acceptance of marginal kidneys. A group of respondents were found to be primarily concerned about cold-ischemia time. Conclusions Physicians appear to consider the recipient characteristics that inform expected post-transplant survival score when deciding whether to accept a marginal kidney for a given recipient.
urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?