Linking grandiose and vulnerable narcissism to managerial work performance, through the lens of core personality traits and social desirability

Anna M. Dåderman,Petri J. Kajonius

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60202-7

IF: 4.6

2024-05-30

Scientific Reports

Abstract:While grandiose narcissism is well-studied, vulnerable narcissism remains largely unexplored in the workplace context. Our study aimed to compare grandiose and vulnerable narcissism among managers and people from the general population. Within the managerial sample, our objective was to examine how these traits diverge concerning core personality traits and socially desirable responses. Furthermore, we endeavored to explore their associations with individual managerial performance, encompassing task performance, contextual performance, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB). Involving a pool of managerial participants ( N = 344), we found that compared to the general population, managers exhibited higher levels of grandiose narcissism and lower levels of vulnerable narcissism. While both narcissistic variants had a minimal correlation ( r = .02) with each other, they differentially predicted work performance. Notably, grandiose narcissism did not significantly predict any work performance dimension, whereas vulnerable narcissism, along with neuroticism, predicted higher CWB and lower task performance. Conscientiousness emerged as the strongest predictor of task performance. This study suggests that organizations might not benefit from managers with vulnerable narcissism. Understanding these distinct narcissistic variants offers insights into their impacts on managerial performance in work settings.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore and compare the differences between managers and the general population in terms of grandiose narcissism and vulnerable narcissism. Specifically, the research objectives include:

1. **Comparing narcissistic traits between managers and the general population**: The study hypothesizes that managers, compared to non-managerial roles, will exhibit higher levels of grandiose narcissism and lower levels of vulnerable narcissism.
2. **Exploring the relationship between core personality traits and social desirability responding**: Within the manager sample, the study examines the different correlations between these two forms of narcissism and core personality traits, and investigates their relationship with social desirability responding.
3. **Investigating the relationship between narcissistic traits and managerial performance**: Further exploration is conducted on the impact of these two forms of narcissism on managers' task performance, contextual performance, and counterproductive work behavior.

The research results indicate that, compared to the general population, managers exhibit higher levels of grandiose narcissism and lower levels of vulnerable narcissism. Additionally, vulnerable narcissism is associated with higher counterproductive work behavior and lower task performance, whereas grandiose narcissism does not significantly predict any dimension of work performance. This finding suggests that organizations may not benefit from managers with vulnerable narcissistic traits. Understanding these two different types of narcissism helps to gain deeper insights into their impact on managerial job performance.