[Characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 Source Profiles for Emissions from Nonmetal Mineral Products Manufacturing Processes]

Xue-Yan Zhao,Gao-Feng Yu,Xin-Wu Wang,Xiang-Yan Zhang,Bao-Hui Yin,Ying-Ying Liu,Xin-Hua Wang,Wen Yang,Ruo-Jie Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201811100
2019-06-08
Abstract:In view of the insufficient source profiles for emissions from nonmetal mineral products manufacturing processes in China, a dilution sampling system was used to collect PM10 and PM2.5 samples from glassmaking, ceramics, and firebrick manufacturing sources between February and June of 2017. The characteristics of 50 chemical components in the samples were studied to identify source profiles. The results showed that the dominant composition of particulate matter in glassmaking plant profiles was Na, with percentages ranging from 9.2% to 18.5%. Ceramics profiles were enriched in Al, Si, Ca, and Fe, with percentages ranging from 1.7% to 8.7%. Refractory brick and shale manufacturing process profiles were characterized by high abundances of SO42- (36.9%-48.1%) and NH4+ (7.7%-17.0%). Chemical components in the source profiles varied with the different fuel types and desulfurization, denitrification, and dedusting methods. The coefficients of divergence (CD) between PM2.5 and PM10 from the same process were similar except for the results from the shale manufacturing process (CD values>0.3), thus indicating that the elements profiles of PM2.5 might be similar to those in PM10. Profiles of the same particle size from different processes were significantly different from one another, with CD values ranging from 0.42 to 0.76. The CD values for float glass and medicinal glass, and the CD values for the two ceramic enterprises were relatively small. The distributions of weighted differences (R/U ratios) were used to compare the differences of components between the source profiles, and results showed that the identified components for glass manufacturing, ceramic manufacturing, fireproof bricks, and page rock bricks were Na and As, Al and Ti, NO3- and NH4+, and SO42- and NH4+, respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?