Abstract:This study was conducted as part of an overall safety study of the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant. The earthquake hazard was considered as an initiating event that could result in radioactive release from the site as a result of core melt. The probability of earthquake initiated releases were compared with the probability of releases due to other initiating events.Three steps are necessary to evaluate the probability of earthquake initiated core melt. 1.(1) estimate the ground motion (peak ground acceleration) and uncertainty in this estimate as functions of annual probability of occurrence;2.(2) estimate the conditional probability of failure and its uncertainty for structures, equipment, piping, controls, etc., as functions of ground acceleration; and3.(3) combine these estimates to obtain probabilities of earthquake induced failure and uncertainties in such estimates to be used in event trees, system models, and fault trees for evaluating the probability of earthquake induced core melt.This paper concentrates on the first two steps with emphasis on step 2. The major difference between the work presented and previous papers is the development and use of uncertainty estimates for both the ground motion probability estimates and the conditional probability of failure estimates.The ground motion capacity of a structure, component, etc., is treated for simplicity and clarity as a product random variable A given by Ǎ = A ϵRϵU, where Ǎ is the best estimate of the median ground acceleration capacity, ϵR and ϵU are lognormal random variables with unit median and logarithmic standard deviation βR and βU, respectively. βR expresses the dispersion in the ground acceleration capacity due to underlying randomness from such sources as (1) the variability of an earthquake time-history and thus of structural response when the earthquake is only defined in terms of the peak ground acceleration; and (2) the variability of structural material properties associated with strength, inelastic energy absorption and damping. Essentially, βR represents those sources of dispersion which cannot be reduced by more detailed evaluation or more data. Uncertainty concerning the ground motion capacity is expressed by βU which results from such things as (1) lack of complete knowledge of structural material properties; and (2) errors in calculating response due to approximate modelling. This paper presents a methodology (with examples) for estimating Ǎ, βR, and βU for structures and components. These estimates are then used to estimate conditional probabilities of failure with confidence bounds on these estimates.The conclusion is that a rational approach exists for estimating earthquake induced probabilities of failure. Confidence bounds on such estimates can be developed to express uncertainty in the parameters used. Such an approach is preferable over one in which dispersion due to underlying randomness, and due to uncertainty in the data are combined into a single probability of failure estimate with no estimate of the uncertainty in this probability.

Bayesian update of fragility curves for equipment failure probability in seismic probabilistic safety assessment in nuclear power plant

Bayesian Approach for Typhoon-Induced Fragility Analysis of Real Overhead Transmission Lines

Seismic fragility analysis of nuclear power plants considering structural parameter uncertainty

Fragility analysis and assessment of large-span beam string-structures

Failure Probability Analysis of Aged Piping Using Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Methodology Considering Seismic Loads

IMPROVED BAYESIAN UPDATE METHOD ON FLAW DISTRIBUTIONS REFLECTING NONDESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION RESULT

Seismic fragility analysis of slopes based on large-scale shaking table model tests

Seismic fragility analysis of nuclear containment structure using Bayesian logistic regression model

Seismic vulnerability assessment of electrical substation system based on the hybrid fragility functions and Bayesian network

Probabilistic seismic safety study of an existing nuclear power plant

Seismic fragility analysis using stochastic polynomial chaos expansions

Enhanced Stochastic Approaches of 1 : 4 PCCV in Nuclear Power Plant: Uncertainty Quantification and Fragility Assessment

Failure Probability Of Degraded Pipes Based On Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics For Seismic Safety Margin Assessment On Npp

Application Of Flaw Updating Process On Probabilistic Structural Evaluation For A Reactor Pressure Vessel Under Pressurized Thermal Shocks

Assessment of various seismic fragility analysis approaches for structures excited by non-stationary stochastic ground motions

Application of Flaw Updating Process on Probabilistic Integrity Analysis for a Reactor Pressure Vessel Subjected to Pressurized Thermal Shocks

Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis of seismic fragility curves using kriging

Computationally efficient Complete-Sampling-based fault tree analyses for seismic probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear facilities

Assessment of Seismic Fragility Using a Three-Dimensional Structural Model of a Reactor Building

Verification of Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analysis Code Through Benchmark Analyses

Uncertainty Quantification of Seismic Response of Nuclear Reactor Building Using a Three‐dimensional Finite Element Model