Examining the Bidirectional Relationship Between Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: Is Entrepreneurship Endogenous?

Maribel N. Mojica-Howell,Wesleyne Whittaker,T. Gebremedhin,P. Schaeffer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/35861
2012-03-14
Abstract:Many scholars and professionals believe that entrepreneurship is critical to maintain an economy’s health and that business creation in low income areas is essential for economic development (Goetz and Freshwater, 2001; Acs, 2006; Lichtenstein and Lyons, 2001; Smilor, 1997). As Minniti (1999) argues, entrepreneurs are catalysts for economic growth as they generate a networking innovation that promotes the creation of new ideas and new market formations. Schumpeter (1934) also states that the success of markets lies in the spirit of entrepreneurs who persist in developing new products and technologies and succeed, ultimately, resulting in lower production costs. He also described five cases in which innovative activity increases economic growth. First is the introduction of a new good, which is a new product or an improvement of a product which is not yet known by the consumers in the market; a new method of production, the one that is not yet used in the manufacturing of the product; a new market that has not been entered for a particular product; a new source of supply for raw materials whether it already exists and is eventually discovered or it has to be created; and the evolution of a new organization in an industry like the formation of a monopoly. According to Schumpeter, these activities result in economic opportunities which eventually lead to economic growth. In addition, the works of entrepreneurs lead to more innovations and more profit opportunities and, hence, more growth which becomes a cycle of economic opportunities and for maximizing profit.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?