Feeding ecology of two wild sympatric canids in protected areas of northeastern Argentina

R. Bay‐Jouliá,V. L. Romero,M. B. Natalini,M. M. Kowalewski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.13239
IF: 2.394
2024-11-27
Journal of Zoology
Abstract:In this study, we described the feeding habits of two sympatric foxes: the crab‐eating fox (Cerdocyon thous) and Pampa's fox (Lycalopex gymnocercus) in three protected areas of northeastern Argentina. Through fecal sample analysis, we found high dietary overlap between the two species despite variable food categories being consumed on each site. This finding may indicate a "noncompetitive coexistence" between these fox species, possibly influenced by ecosystem dynamics or fine‐scale niche partitioning. The role of mesocarnivores in wildlife communities tends to be overlooked, which has led to a large gap in natural history knowledge. In northeastern Argentina, two mesocarnivore foxes, Cerdocyon thous and Lycalopex gymnocercus, live in sympatry in noncompetitive coexistence. Their feeding habits have been studied in many occasions; however, the studies related to trophic variability in a wider spatial scale remain scarce. In this study, we aimed to analyze how the diet of these foxes varies in three protected areas in Argentina: the Mburucuyá National Park (MNP), the "San Nicolás Portal" (SN), and the Natural Reserve Rincón de Santa María (RSM). We collected fecal samples in each area, identified them using thin layer chromatography at species level, and classified the found feeding items to obtained two parameters: occurrence and relative frequency. Furthermore, we compared the diet of the two species in each site and between sites using chi‐square and estimated trophic niche breadth and overlap between the species. We found that both species consumed different food categories, with variable frequencies across study sites. We observed that in each area, the foxes differed in diet composition. However, we found no differences between the diet compositions of C. thous and L. gymnocercus, showing high niche overlap in each site. Here, we show the plasticity of both fox species in changing their diets even with small geographical variation. Both species can coexist even with a high diet overlap, possibly explained by their noncompetitive coexistence which may occur due to the current changes in the ecosystem interactions, or partitioning may exist but on a smaller niche level.
zoology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?