Abstract:Background: Quality of bowel preparation and patient knowledge remains a major barrier for completing colorectal cancer screening. Few studies have tested unique ways to impact patient understanding centering on interactive computer programs, pictures, and brochures. Two studies explored instructional videos but focused on patient compliance and anxiety as endpoints. Furthermore, excessive video length and content may limit their impact on a broad patient population. No study so far has studied a video's impact on preparation quality and patient understanding of the colonoscopy procedure. Methods: We conducted a single blinded prospective study of inner city patients presenting for a first time screening colonoscopy. During their initial visit patients were randomized to watch an instructional colonoscopy video or a video discussing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). All patients watched a 6 minutes long video with the same spokesperson, completed a demographic questionnaire (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JCG/A352) and were enrolled only if screened within 30 days of their visit. On the day of the colonoscopy, patients completed a 14 question quiz of their knowledge. Blinded endoscopist graded patient preparations based on the Ottawa scale. All authors had access to the study data and reviewed and approved the final manuscript. Results: Among the 104 subjects enrolled in the study, 56 were in the colonoscopy video group, 48 were in GERD video group, and 12 were excluded. Overall, 48% were male and 52% female; 90% of patients had less than a high school education, 76% were African American, and 67% used a 4 L split-dose preparation. There were no differences between either video group with regard to any of the above categories. Comparisons between the 2 groups revealed that the colonoscopy video group had significantly better Ottawa bowel preparation score (4.77 vs. 6.85; P=0.01) than the GERD video group. The colonoscopy video group also had less-inadequate repeat bowel preparations versus the GERD video group (9% vs. 23%; P<0.01). The overall score on the knowledge questionnaire (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JCG/A352) was significantly higher in the colonoscopy video group as compared with the GERD video group (12.77 vs. 11.08; P<0.001. In all patients the overall quiz score positively correlated with preparation quality (odds ratio, 2.31; confidence interval, 1.35-3.94; P<0.001). Conclusions: Our unique population represented an overwhelmingly under-educated (85% had a high school education or less) and minority group (76% African American). They are one of the most at risk of having multiple barriers such as comprehension and reading difficulties resulting in poor preparation examinations and no shows to procedures. Our instructional video proved to be high yield in this population. The patients assigned to watch the colonoscopy video showed a significant increase in "excellent" grade adequate bowel preparation quality by >23% and a significant decrease in "inadequate" bowel preparations by almost 50%. Our study proves that an educational video can improve both comprehension with regard to all aspects of colonoscopy. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02906969.

Educational virtual reality videos in improving bowel preparation quality and satisfaction of outpatients undergoing colonoscopy: protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Improving the quality of bowel preparation by smartphone education platform prior to colonoscopy: a randomized trail

Implementation of virtual reality technology to decrease patients' pain and nervousness during colonoscopies: a prospective randomised controlled single-blinded trial

Colonoscopy Training on Virtual-Reality Simulators or Physical Model Simulators: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Improving The Quality Of Bowel Preparation Through An App For Inpatients Undergoing Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Educational Colonoscopy Video Enhances Bowel Preparation Quality and Comprehension in an Inner City Population

Increased quality of bowel preparation via smartphone WeChat application: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

A randomized controlled trial of an educational video to improve quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy

A novel strategy for improving bowel preparation based on social software-enhanced education: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study

A smartphone application to enhance bowel preparation for first-time colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study

Delivery of Instructions Via Mobile Social Media App Increases Quality of Bowel Preparation

Use of virtual reality in patient education program to reduce anxiety in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A randomized controlled trial

Determining efficacy of dynamic multimedia bowel preparation instructions versus standard instructions on adenoma detection and patient reported measures (DIGICLEAN trial): a study protocol for a multicentre, colonoscopist-blinded, randomised controlled trial

A Pilot Study on Less-Stressful Bowel Preparation for Virtual Colonoscopy Screening with Follow-Up Biopsy by Optical Colonoscopy

Improving bowel preparation for colonoscopy with a smartphone application driven by artificial intelligence

Effects of biophilic virtual reality on cognitive function of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: study protocol for a sham randomised controlled trial

Enhanced education for bowel preparation before colonoscopy: A state‐of‐the‐art review

A Feasibility Study on Laxative-Free Bowel Preparation for Virtual Colonoscopy

A Novel Approach to Improving Colonoscopy Learning Efficiency Through a Colonoscope Roaming System: Randomized Controlled Trial

Real-word Evaluation of Differences in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy Between the Digestive and the Non-Digestive Physicians: A Retrospective Study

Preoperative Automatic Reminder Systems and Impact on Quality and Compliance with Colonoscopy Preparation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.