Abstract:Statement of problem Poor or lack of adherence to supportive peri-implant therapy (SPIT) or supportive care has been associated with a significantly higher rate of peri-implantitis or peri-implant mucositis. However, whether therapy with or without the removal of an implant-supported prosthesis yields different outcomes remains unclear. Purpose The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonic devices in treating participants with or without the removal of implant-supported prostheses after more than 12 months of loading. Material and methods Twenty participants with 23 implant-supported fixed prostheses (39 implants) with indications for removal were included in this study. The following clinical parameters were recorded before the prostheses were removed: the maximum probing depth (PDmax), bleeding on probing (BOP), months of loading, and complications. Each prosthesis was removed and treated with a regular plaque indicator test and then reinserted. This was followed by the intraoral administration of regular supportive therapy via ultrasonically driven polyetheretherketone instrument tips. After instrumentation, the prostheses were removed to access the area positively stained for calculus or biofilm. PT0 and PT1 show the plaque coverage before and after intraoral ultrasonic cleaning, respectively. The reduction in the positive staining area and the efficacy of ultrasonic cleaning with or without prosthesis removal were measured. The Kolmogorov−Smirnov test was performed to verify that the sample data were normally distributed. Comparisons between PT0 and PT1 were conducted via paired t tests, followed by the Student t test for comparisons between groups (α=.05). Results A 27.3 ±15.0% reduction in plaque coverage was observed after the implant restorations had been cleaned intraorally. The efficacy of intraoral ultrasonic cleaning was only 45.4 ±20.6%, with a residual plaque rate of 54.6%. Cleaning without the removal of implant-supported restorations was less effective in participants with a PD >5 mm than in the other participants ( P =.001). Neither the emergence angle nor the emergence profile had a significant influence on the cleaning effectiveness ( P >.05). Conclusions Biofilms at the abutment−prosthesis connection and mucosal and proximal surfaces of the prosthesis may not be effectively cleaned by conventional SPIT. Biofilm reduction is improved by prosthesis removal when the PD is >5 mm.

Preclinical Validation of a Novel Device Designed to Reduce Biofilms on Percutaneous Osseointegrated Abutments

Microbiological cleaning and disinfection efficacy of a three-stage ultrasonic processing protocol for CAD-CAM implant abutments

Effectivity of homecare and professional biofilm removal procedures on initial supragingival biofilm on laser-microtextured implant surfaces in an ex vivo model

Decontaminating the surfaces of bonded screw-retained implant prostheses: A comparison of three different post-processing cleaning techniques

The Decontamination Effect of an Oscillating Chitosan Brush Compared With an Ultrasonic PEEK‐Tip: An In Vitro Study Using a Dynamic Biofilm Model

Biofouling on Titanium Implants: A Novel Formulation of Poloxamer and Peroxide for In situ Removal of Pellicle and Multispecies Oral Biofilm

Qualitative and Semi-Quantitative Assessment of Processing-Related Surface Contamination of One- and Two-Piece CAD/CAM Abutments before and after Ultrasonic Cleaning

Effect of implant cleaning on titanium particle dissolution and cytocompatibility

Effect of Different Cleaning Regimes on Biofilm Formation of Acrylic-Based Removable Orthodontic Appliance: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Necessity of removing implant-supported prostheses when conducting supportive peri-implant therapy: A clinical study

Efficacy of Combined Mechanical and Chemical Decontamination Treatments on Smooth and Rough Titanium Surfaces and Their Effects on Osteoconduction: An Ex Vivo Study

Antimicrobial efficiency and cytocompatibility of different decontamination methods on titanium and zirconium surfaces

Nonsurgical cleaning potential of deep-threaded implants and titanium particle release: A novel in vitro tissue model

Fibrin clot adherence on cleaned and decontaminated titanium abutment surfaces: An in vitro study

Hard tissue response to argon plasma cleaning/sterilisation of customised titanium abutments versus 5-second steam cleaning: results of a 2-year post-loading follow-up from an explanatory randomised controlled trial in periodontally healthy patients

Electrochemical removal of peri-implantitis associated biofilms from titanium implant surfaces by in-situ anodization

Comparison of decontamination efficacy of two electrolyte cleaning methods to diode laser, plasma, and air-abrasive devices

A New Strategy Against Peri-Implantitis: Antibacterial Internal Coating

In vitro evaluation of chemical decontamination of titanium discs

Efficiency of cold atmospheric plasma, cleaning powders and their combination for biofilm removal on two different titanium implant surfaces

Enhancing Presurgical Infant Orthopedic Appliances: Characterization, Mechanics, and Biofilm Inhibition of a Novel Chlorhexidine-Halloysite Nanotube-Modified PMMA