Medical computing programs

S. Brunjes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1111084.1111097
1981-03-01
Abstract:I think there should be some small requirement, but for slightly different reasons° In medicine none of us can know everything in all fields, so what we actually learn are transfer vectors. That is, we learn who to get to or what book to get to~ The same thing should be true about what doctors learn about computers, because they are becoming an important part of the treatment modality, in monitoring and radiotherapy-in a number of fields. The other reason is that a lot of harm can be done if a doctor gets a bad system, so you have got to give a little defense training, too. So he does not need so much a point of view. Rather, make him sympathetic to the computer professional. He should at least know what pitfalls to avoid, who to get for help and maybe, just as much as he knows about surgery and other kinds of treatment, know that there are computers which have a bearing on his treatment. George Malindzak. .. I have been a member of admissions committees in medical schools for about 15 years. The suggestion of a combined Master's and M.D. degree is, at least at this point in time, almost completely unviable. (protests) A criterion for the selection of potential medical students is not to produce more people in research. We are really trying to produce more physicians in specialty and subspecialty areas, rather than create new research physicians. My other comment i for a medical school in devoted to introducing has been at least to in we know it today so tha machine for help. He s him to utilize that res which in turn make him a better physician. Robert Votaw. • • With regard to the students who I thoughtwould be excellent candidates for the combined M.S.-M.D. degrees, into clinical medicine, family medicine, internal me am not talking about researchers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?