Abstract:Background: Writing is a complex activity involving various cognitive processes in the planning, the transcription and the revision of written texts. The present study focused on the revision of written texts within a developmental approach. Aims: The study aimed to examine whether children and adults use different procedures to detect and revise erroneous grammatical agreements. It was predicted that children would use a slow algorithmic procedure while adults would use a fast automatized procedure. Sample: One hundred and twenty participants from 5th grade to undergraduate levels (24 per level) participated in the study. Method: The participants were asked to decide as quickly as possible whether a visually presented sentence had any agreement error. The French experimental sentences were of the type 'The N1 of the N2 + Verb', in which N2 was either a plausible subject of the following verb (e. g., The guard of the prisoners watches) or an implausible subject (e. g., The guard of the safes watches). Correctness and latency of the responses were recorded. Results: The main results showed that only the younger participants were affected by the subject-role plausibility of N2, and that there was no difference in response latency between their correct and incorrect responses. These observations support the hypothesis that the younger participants systematically apply a time-consuming algorithmic procedure to verify the agreement; since one step of this procedure consists in searching for the subject of the verb, these participants were frequently misled by the subject-role plausibility of N2. On the contrary, the older participants were not affected by the plausibility of N2, but were frequently misled by erroneous agreements between N2 and the verb. These observations support the view that these older participants use a fast decision strategy based on the co-occurrence of formal indices. Their correct answers, however, were slower than their incorrect ones; this suggests that they also sometimes use a time-consuming controlled procedure. Conclusion: The study shows that along with the acquisition of writing expertise, the revising activity itself is progressively facilitated and gradually automatized by substituting a fast direct decision strategy for a slow and laborious use of revision rules.

Online management of text production from pictures: a comparison between fifth graders and undergraduate students

Comparative Study about the Impacts of Chinese Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) Feedback and Teacher Feedback on Middle School Students’ Writing Practice

Writing in first and second language. Empirical studies on text quality and writing processes.

Effects of Dictation, Speech to Text, and Handwriting on the Written Composition of Elementary School English Language Learners

Understanding Online Revisions in L2 Writing: A Computer Keystroke-Log Perspective

Providing Online Feedback Using an AI Proof-reading Tool to Enhance Student Surface-Level Writing Skills

Narrative Writing Progress of Rural Elementary Students in Mixed-Ability Online Pairings

An Output-oriented Approach to the Impact of Online Written Languaging on Form-Focused Writing Tasks

Interpreting old texts with new tools: Digital multimodal composition for a high school reading assignment

The contribution of executive functions to narrative writing in fourth grade children

Handwriting versus keyboarding: Does writing modality affect quality of narratives written by beginning writers?

Motivation For Learning In Virtual Environments, Online Self-Regulated Learning, And Writing Performance Of OMSC Students

The Influence of Texting Language on Grammar and Executive Functions in Primary School Children

Text quality and changing perceptions of teacher feedback and affective-motivational variables: a study with secondary EFL students

Handwriting fluency and the quality of primary grade students’ writing

Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context

The revision process during handwritten text production: The case of French higher education students with dyslexia

Student Engagement With Teacher Written Feedback in Online EFL Writing Context

The influence of nonautonomous online collaborative writing on EFL learners

Online collaborative writing in an online EFL writing class

Orthographic revision: a developmental study of how revisers check verbal agreements in written texts