Isolation and Identification of Aeromonas spp. from Ground Meats in Eastern Canada

Umadatt Singh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-60.2.125
Abstract:Two commercially available media, Ryan's aeromonas medium (RAM) and GSP agar pseudomonas aeromonas selective agar base (GSP) and one laboratory prepared medium, starch ampicillin agar (SAA), were compared for their ability to recover Aeromonas spp. from pure culture, raw ground beef, and spiked autoclaved ground beef samples. In all instances SAA medium proved to be superior for recovery of Aeromonas spp. Selectivity with SAA and GSP was better than with RAM with 100% of typical colonies confirming as Aeromonas spp. The incidence of motile Aeromonas spp. in ground meat samples in Eastern Canada was determined during a 1-year period using SAA as the isolation medium. Aeromonas spp. was found in 4 of 4 ground pork, chicken, turkey, and sausage samples and in 15 of 19 ground beef samples. Two hundred and ten presumptive Aeromonas isolates were characterized biochemically to the species level. Ninety-seven percent of the isolates from pork and 87% from ground beef were identified as Aeromonas hydrophila . Of the isolates from chicken and turkey, 40 and 56% respectively were found to be this latter species. The numbers of Aeromonas sobria and Aeromonas caviae isolated from these products were 30 and 20% for chicken and 8 and 16% for turkey respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?