SPLENECTOMY IN SPHEROCYTOSIS: IS IT WORTH THE RISK?

C. Manno,A. Cohen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-198404001-00909
IF: 3.953
1984-04-01
Pediatric Research
Abstract:Splenectomy reduces the incidence of gallstone formation in patients with hereditary spherocytosis (HS). However, this surgical procedure carries an operative risk as well as the risk of postsplenectomy sepsis (PSS). Furthermore, gallstones do not always cause symptomatic biliary tract disease. Using decision analysis, a quantitative approach to problem solving under conditions of uncertainty, we have examined the relative merits of two approaches to patients with mild HS: (1) routine splenectomy in childhood or (2) cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones in adulthood. Probability values for critical events were obtained from the medical literature; final outcome is recovery or death. The analysis shows the risk of death associated with the choice of splenectomy to be 40 times greater than the risk of cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones (.0245 vs .0006). Sensitivity and threshold analyses show that the decision to avoid splenectomy remains unaltered even if the risk of death from PSS (.022) is reduced four-fold or if the risk of developing gallstones (including symptomatic and silent stones) is increased from .43 to 1.0. The choices become equivalent only if the risk of developing symptomatic gallstones increases from .08 to .50 while the risk of PSS falls from .022 to .001. On the basis of the best data currently available, the preferable course for patients with HS and mild anemia is careful surveillance for symptomatic biliary tract disease rather than routine splenectomy to prevent gallstones.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?