Abstract:BACKGROUND: Some studies have revealed an increased risk of early aseptic loosening of cementless stems in THA when inserted through an anterior or anterolateral approach compared with a posterior approach, whereas approach does not appear to be a risk factor in others. Stem design, whether "anatomic" (that is, stems with a curved lateral profile or an obtuse angle at the proximal-lateral portion of the stem) or "shoulder" (that is, straight with a proximal shoulder), may also be associated with a differential risk of aseptic loosening in cementless THA depending on the surgical approach used, but if so, this risk is not well characterized.QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this national registry study, we investigated the association between surgical approach and early aseptic loosening of (1) cementless femoral stems with a proximal angular shape (shoulder); and (2) anatomically shaped femoral stems.METHODS: The Dutch Arthroplasty Registry is a nationwide population-based register recording data on primary and revision hip arthroplasty. We selected all primary THAs (n = 63,354) with a cementless femoral stem inserted through an anterior, anterolateral, or posterior approach from 2007 to 2013 with a minimal followup of 2 years. Femoral stems were classified as "anatomic," "shoulder," or "other" (that is, not classifiable as anatomic or shoulder). From the 47,372 THAs with an anatomic or shoulder stem (mean followup, 3.5 years; SD, 1.8 years), 340 (0.7%) underwent revision surgery as a result of aseptic loosening of the femoral stem, 1195 (2.5%) were revised for other reasons, and 1558 patients (3.3%) died. We used Cox proportional hazard models to determine hazard ratios for aseptic loosening of anatomic and shoulder stems for the anterolateral and anterior approaches compared with the posterior approach.RESULTS: After controlling for relevant confounding variables such as sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, previous surgery, and coating and material of the femoral stem, we found that there was a stem-approach interaction. Separate analysis showed that shoulder stems had a greater likelihood of early aseptic loosening when the anterolateral approach (hazard ratio [HR], 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-3.63; p < 0.001) or anterior approach (HR, 10.47; 95% CI, 2.55-43.10; p = 0.001) was used compared with the posterior approach. Separate analysis of the anatomic stems yielded no association with approach (anterolateral: HR, 1.07, 95% CI, 0.70-1.63, p = 0.77; anterior: HR, 1.31, 95% CI, 0.91-1.89, p = 0.15).CONCLUSIONS: In THA, cementless femoral stems with a proximal shoulder are associated with early aseptic loosening when inserted through an anterior or anterolateral approach compared with a posterior approach. An anatomically shaped stem may be preferred with these approaches, although further analysis with larger registry volumes should confirm our results, in particular for shouldered stems when implanted through an anterior approach.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

High femoral offset as a risk factor for aseptic femoral component loosening in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty

No differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes between standard offset and high offset short cementless stems

Gender differences in cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty: significantly higher femoral lengthening in female patients

Leg length and offset measures with a pinless femoral reference array during THA

Effect of longer femoral head on leg length, offset, and range of motion in total hip arthroplasty: a simulation study

Do Stem Design and Surgical Approach Influence Early Aseptic Loosening in Cementless THA?

Unexpected early loosening of rectangular straight femoral Zweymüller stems with an alumina-reduced surface after total hip arthroplasty—a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Early failure of an uncemented femoral stem, as compared to two other stems with similar design, following primary total hip arthroplasty performed with direct anterior approach

Femoral neck cut level affects positioning of modular short-stem implant

Cemented femoral stem design and postoperative periprosthetic fracture risk following total hip arthroplasty

Offset Considerations in Total Hip Arthroplasty

A 10-Year Longitudinal Study Using Ein Bild Röntgen Analyse–Femoral Component Analysis

Measurement of operative femoral anteversion during cementless total hip arthroplasty and influencing factors for using neck-adjustable femoral stem

Comparative analysis of femoral bone loss: uncemented vs. cemented aseptic stem loosening in first-time revision surgery—a retrospective evaluation of 215 patients

The Impact of Leg Length and Offset Change on Dislocation Risk Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Is there a difference in pelvic and femoral morphology in early periprosthetic femoral fracture in cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty via an anterolateral approach?

The Role of Global Femoral Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty with High Hip Center Technique

Short single-wedge stems have higher risk of periprosthetic fracture than other cementless stem designs in Dorr type A femurs: a finite element analysis

Extended offset stems are infrequently required in anterior approach total hip arthroplasty and low usage does not compromise stability

Femoral Component Design Is Associated With the Risk of Periprosthetic Femur Fracture After Cementless THA in Patients 65 Years or Older

Change in Femoral Offset after Closed Reduction and Dynamic Hip Screw Osteosynthesis Via Lateral Approach in Patients with Medial Femoral Neck Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis