Abstract:BACKGROUND: Some studies have revealed an increased risk of early aseptic loosening of cementless stems in THA when inserted through an anterior or anterolateral approach compared with a posterior approach, whereas approach does not appear to be a risk factor in others. Stem design, whether "anatomic" (that is, stems with a curved lateral profile or an obtuse angle at the proximal-lateral portion of the stem) or "shoulder" (that is, straight with a proximal shoulder), may also be associated with a differential risk of aseptic loosening in cementless THA depending on the surgical approach used, but if so, this risk is not well characterized.QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this national registry study, we investigated the association between surgical approach and early aseptic loosening of (1) cementless femoral stems with a proximal angular shape (shoulder); and (2) anatomically shaped femoral stems.METHODS: The Dutch Arthroplasty Registry is a nationwide population-based register recording data on primary and revision hip arthroplasty. We selected all primary THAs (n = 63,354) with a cementless femoral stem inserted through an anterior, anterolateral, or posterior approach from 2007 to 2013 with a minimal followup of 2 years. Femoral stems were classified as "anatomic," "shoulder," or "other" (that is, not classifiable as anatomic or shoulder). From the 47,372 THAs with an anatomic or shoulder stem (mean followup, 3.5 years; SD, 1.8 years), 340 (0.7%) underwent revision surgery as a result of aseptic loosening of the femoral stem, 1195 (2.5%) were revised for other reasons, and 1558 patients (3.3%) died. We used Cox proportional hazard models to determine hazard ratios for aseptic loosening of anatomic and shoulder stems for the anterolateral and anterior approaches compared with the posterior approach.RESULTS: After controlling for relevant confounding variables such as sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, previous surgery, and coating and material of the femoral stem, we found that there was a stem-approach interaction. Separate analysis showed that shoulder stems had a greater likelihood of early aseptic loosening when the anterolateral approach (hazard ratio [HR], 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-3.63; p < 0.001) or anterior approach (HR, 10.47; 95% CI, 2.55-43.10; p = 0.001) was used compared with the posterior approach. Separate analysis of the anatomic stems yielded no association with approach (anterolateral: HR, 1.07, 95% CI, 0.70-1.63, p = 0.77; anterior: HR, 1.31, 95% CI, 0.91-1.89, p = 0.15).CONCLUSIONS: In THA, cementless femoral stems with a proximal shoulder are associated with early aseptic loosening when inserted through an anterior or anterolateral approach compared with a posterior approach. An anatomically shaped stem may be preferred with these approaches, although further analysis with larger registry volumes should confirm our results, in particular for shouldered stems when implanted through an anterior approach.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Unexpected early loosening of rectangular straight femoral Zweymüller stems with an alumina-reduced surface after total hip arthroplasty—a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Pure Alumina Bearings with Cementless Stems Versus Sandwich Bearings with Cemented Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Intermediate outcomes of alumina-on-alumina bearing total hip arthroplastyTotal arthroplasty, replacement, hip; Ceramic; Frictione; Prostheses and implants

Early failure of an uncemented femoral stem, as compared to two other stems with similar design, following primary total hip arthroplasty performed with direct anterior approach

[Intermediate Outcomes of Alumina-on-alumina Bearing Total Hip Arthroplasty].

Femoral Component Revision Using Extensively Porous-Coated Cementless Stem.

Increased stability of short femoral stem through customized distribution of coefficient of friction in porous coating

LONG TERM DATA CONCERNING THE USE OF ALL ALUMINA IN TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS: SPECIAL INTEREST IN YOUNG AGE POPULATION.

Satisfactory clinical and radiologic outcomes with a new shorter and modular stem for end-stage hip osteoarthritis: an international prospective multicentre pilot study

A novel design of hip-stem with reduced strain-shielding

Mid-term results of total hip arthroplasty using a novel uncemented short femoral stem with metaphyso-diaphyseal fixation

Debulking of the Femoral Stem in a Primary Total Hip Joint Replacement: A Novel Method to Reduce Stress Shielding

Primary stability in total hip replacement: A biomechanical investigation

Strategic Debulking of the Femoral Stem Promotes Load Sharing Through Controlled Flexural Rigidity of the Implant Wall: Optimization of Design by Finite Element Analysis

Femoral Stem Wear in Cemented Total Hip Replacement

Thirty years of experience with alumina-on-alumina bearings in total hip arthroplasty

Do Stem Design and Surgical Approach Influence Early Aseptic Loosening in Cementless THA?

Cemented Calcar-Guided Short-Stem Prostheses in Geriatric Patients: Short-Term Results from a Prospective Observational Study

Two-year minimum survivorship and radiographic analysis of a pressfit short humeral stem for total shoulder arthroplasty

Periprosthetic fractures may be more likely in cementless femoral stems with sharp edges

Comparative analysis of femoral bone loss: uncemented vs. cemented aseptic stem loosening in first-time revision surgery—a retrospective evaluation of 215 patients