How good is good? Probabilistic benchmarks and nanofinance+

Rolando Gonzales Martinez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-804549/v1
2021-08-13
Abstract:Abstract Benchmarks are standards that allow to identify opportunities for improvement among comparable units. This study suggests a 2-step methodology for calculating probabilistic benchmarks in noisy data sets: (i) double-hyperbolic undersampling filters the noise of key performance indicators (KPIs), and (ii) a relevance vector machine estimates probabilistic benchmarks with denoised KPIs. The usefulness of the methods is illustrated with an application to a database of nano-finance+. The results indicate that---in the case of nano-finance groups---a higher discrimination power is obtained with variables that capture the macro-economic environment of the country where a group operates. Also, the estimates show that groups operating in rural regions have different probabilistic benchmarks, compared to groups in urban and peri-urban areas.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?