Benchmark-based deviation and drawdown measures in portfolio optimization

Michael Zabarankin,Bogdan Grechuk,Dawei Hao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-024-02124-x
IF: 1.5288
2024-06-26
Optimization Letters
Abstract:Understanding and modeling of agent's risk/reward preferences is a central problem in various applications of risk management including investment science and portfolio theory in particular. One of the approaches is to axiomatically define a set of performance measures and to use a benchmark to identify a particular measure from that set by either inverse optimization or functional dominance. For example, such a benchmark could be the rate of return of an existing attractive financial instrument. This work introduces deviation and drawdown measures that incorporate rates of return of indicated financial instruments (benchmarks). For discrete distributions and discrete sample paths, portfolio problems with such measures are reduced to linear programs and solved based on historical data in cases of a single benchmark and three benchmarks used simultaneously. The optimal portfolios and corresponding benchmarks have similar expected/cumulative rates of return in sample and out of sample, but the former are considerably less volatile.
mathematics, applied,operations research & management science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper discusses how benchmarks can be used to define and select deviation measures and drawdown measures in portfolio optimization. The authors propose benchmark-based methods for measuring the performance of portfolios relative to a chosen benchmark. In terms of deviation measures, the paper considers the difference between portfolio returns and benchmark returns, and constructs an optimization problem by maximizing the lower bound of this difference. This allows investors to select investment strategies based on historical data and multiple benchmarks to reduce volatility and improve returns. The paper transforms this problem into a linear programming problem for numerical solution. For drawdown measures, the paper introduces a sample path-based measure called Conditional Drawdown-at-Risk (CDaR), and also proposes a benchmark-based drawdown measure. This helps investors evaluate the performance of portfolios under adverse market conditions. Similarly, this problem is also transformed into a linear programming form for calculation and optimization. The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of these measures in practical applications through examples and compares the performance of optimal investment portfolios under different benchmarks. The results show that benchmark-based investment strategies can provide better risk-adjusted returns and are generally more stable than single or multiple benchmarks. Overall, this paper provides new tools for portfolio optimization, allowing investors to customize investment strategies more accurately based on individual risk preferences and market conditions.