Educational and Patient Care Impacts of In Situ Simulation in Healthcare
Aaron W Calhoun,David A Cook,Gina Genova,Seyed Mohammad Kalantar Motamedi,Muhammad Waseem,Rob Carey,Amy Hanson,Jacky C K Chan,Cheryl Camacho,Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky,Barbara Walsh,Marjorie White,Gary Geis,Anne Marie Monachino,Tensing Maa,Glenn Posner,David Li Li,Yiqun Lin,Aaron W. Calhoun,David A. Cook,Jacky C.K. Chan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000773
2024-01-01
Abstract:Abstract This systematic review was performed to assess the effectiveness of in situ simulation education. We searched databases including MEDLINE and Embase for studies comparing in situ simulation with other educational approaches. Two reviewers screened articles and extracted information. Sixty-two articles met inclusion criteria, of which 24 were synthesized quantitatively using random effects meta-analysis. When compared with current educational practices alone, the addition of in situ simulation to these practices was associated with small improvements in clinical outcomes, including mortality [odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55 to 0.78], care metrics (standardized mean difference, −0.34; 95% CI, −0.45 to −0.21), and nontechnical skills (standardized mean difference, −0.52; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.05). Comparisons between in situ and traditional simulation showed mixed learner preference and knowledge improvement between groups, while technical skills showed improvement attributable to in situ simulation. In summary, available evidence suggests that adding in situ simulation to current educational practices may improve patient mortality and morbidity.
health care sciences & services