Abstract:coding andrepresentation inneural systemaredetermined by spatio-temporal interaction of synapses. Spike-timing dependent plasticity(STDP) shows synaptic efficacy and information transfer are highly dependent ontherelative timing (about± 50ms) ofthepre-and postsynaptic spikes andtheir interactional patterns. Inthis article, wesuggest anewformula ofsynaptic plasticity based onSTDP.We select H-RandDIFaspre-andpostsynaptic neuronmodelrespectively andsimulate threefundamental interactional patterns. Then,we consider plastic similarity betweenthelevel ofbehavior andneuronsduetothe aggregation ofrepetitive stimulations. Finally, weexplore some implications ofSTDPonthestability ofneural network. I.INTRODUCTION Information received bytheneuron viasynaptic inputs is integrated byspatial andtemporal summation ofexcitatory andinhibitory synaptic potentials atthedendrite. Inthepast, temporal summation hasbeeninterpreted asarequirement ofcoincidence, summarized inthepopular mnemonics: cells that fire together, wiretogether (Shatz, Zigmond et al.1999). Overthepastseveral years, there hasbeen increasing interest inanovel extension toHebbian synaptic plasticity called spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP), andtherecent experimental andtheoretical evidence also showthat relative timing ofpre- andpostsynaptic spikes can becritical forthedirection andmagnitude ofplastic change, inwhich both potentiation anddepression occur atsynapses obeysuchSTDP learning rules, namely, synaptic modification depends on variations of onlya few milliseconds intherelative timing ofpre- andpostsynaptic spikes during theperiod ofassociation. Theseresults challenge theconventional understanding ofHebb's rule andraise intriguing questions regarding thefundamental processes ofspike trains. Thefirst section ofthis paper reviews Hebbian synaptic plasticity andrecent experimental finding aboutSTDP, whichistemporally asymmetric. Inthis section, wealso summarize possible temporal integration andweight dependent rule ofSTDP.Inthesecond part ofthepaper, we propose abiologically reasonable learning algorithm based onSTDPandimplement relative computational models. Finally, wediscuss howSTDPshedlight onthestability of biological neural network. This paper isamodest step inthedirection, inwhich we modify Hebbian rule tomakeheuristic learning algorithm andsimulate three fundamental interactional patterns which areplausible consistent withempirical observations.

Temporal Sequence Learning, Prediction, and Control: A Review of Different Models and Their Relation to Biological Mechanisms

Spatial representation of temporal information through spike timing dependent plasticity

Sequence learning, prediction, and replay in networks of spiking neurons

Spike-timing-dependent plasticity: common themes and divergent vistas

Temporal sequence learning in winner-take-all networks of spiking neurons demonstrated in a brain-based device

Temporal Modulation of Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity

Coherent noise enables probabilistic sequence replay in spiking neuronal networks

Spiking-timing based pattern recognition with real-world visual stimuli

Representation and Timing in Theories of the Dopamine System

Reinforcement Learning in Spiking Neural Networks with Stochastic and Deterministic Synapses

A history of spike-timing-dependent plasticity

Synaptic basis of a sub-second representation of time in a neural circuit model

Spikes, synchrony, and attentive learning by laminar thalamocortical circuits

A New Formula Ofsynaptic Plasticity Based on STDP Anditsimplications

Predictive learning by a burst-dependent learning rule

Learning depends on the information conveyed by temporal relationships between events and is reflected in the dopamine response to cues

Tutorial: Neuromorphic spiking neural networks for temporal learning

Alternative time representation in dopamine models

Reinforcement learning using a continuous time actor-critic framework with spiking neurons

A Temporal Signal-Processing Circuit Based on Spiking Neuron and Synaptic Learning

An introduction to reinforcement learning for neuroscience