Abstract:Background: Patient-oriented research is now widely regarded as key to improving health systems and patient outcomes. This shift toward meaningful patient involvement in health research has sparked a growing interest in patient-oriented research training across Canada. Yet some barriers to participation, including distance and scheduling constraints, may impede the provision of in-person patient-oriented research training. Virtual course delivery options may help surmount those barriers, as well as offer unique pedagogical advantages. Objective: To help increase patient-oriented research training uptake, the research team adapted the Canadian Institutes of Health Research's (CIHR) Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research's Foundations for Patient-Oriented Research course to a virtual format. The course consists of three modules, which focus respectively on patient-oriented research, health research methods, and teamwork skills. The current evaluation of this virtual delivery examines how a diverse set of participants received the online course. Methods: Course participants from a variety of professional backgrounds, including researchers, patients, clinicians, and policy decision-makers, were recruited from across Canada to participate in the adapted course. Participant and facilitator feedback was solicited via online surveys that were distributed shortly after the delivery of each module. Results: Over the span of the current project, the online course was delivered seven times across Canada. A total of 189 learners and 12 facilitators participated in the course. We received 89 completed feedback surveys in total. These included a total of 78 responses from learners, with 22 on Module 1, 32 on Module 2, and 24 on Module 3, in addition to 11 responses from facilitators. Overall, participants and facilitators were very satisfied with the course, indicating a successful adaptation from traditional to online delivery. Survey respondents were especially pleased with the course's co-learning elements, which exposed them to fresh perspectives and real patient voices, as well as ample opportunity for discussion. Some participants offered recommendations for minor course revisions. Future iterations of the course will reflect participant and facilitator feedback to enhance accessibility via minor changes to course format (e.g., shorter live sessions), content (e.g., more concrete examples), and workload (e.g., reduced pre-work requirements). Conclusions: Sustainable and effective health care depends on health research that includes active partnerships across diverse populations. These collaborative relationships are fostered by strong capacity in patient-oriented research, which in turn hinges on widely accessible training opportunities. This online course overcomes common barriers to face-to-face training and offers the accessible, inclusive training environment required for sustained progress in patient-oriented research.

Going virtual: mixed methods evaluation of online versus in-person learning in the NIH mixed methods research training program retreat

Training "Pivots" from the Pandemic: Lessons Learned Transitioning from In-Person to Virtual Synchronous Training in the Clinical Scholars Leadership Program

Modalities for teaching responsible and ethical conduct of research online: Lessons learned from an undergraduate workshop in Utah

Enhancing patient-oriented research training: participant perceptions of an online course

Immersive Leadership Training for Physicians: Comparing Retrospective Pre- and Post-Test Virtual vs in-Person 6-Month Follow-Up of Learning

Evaluation of a brief virtual implementation science training program: the Penn Implementation Science Institute

Development, Evaluation, and Long-Term Outcomes of Environmental Health and Land Reuse Training-Part 1: Developing Environmental Health and Land Reuse Trainings for the Environmental Health Workforce and Their Community Partners

Comparing an In-Person and Online Continuing Education Intervention to Improve Professional Decision-Making: A Mixed Methods Study

Evaluation of a virtual, simulated international public health peer-to-peer exchange learning experience

Innovations in Undergraduate Research Training Through Multisite Collaborative Programming: American Heart Association Summer Undergraduate Research Experience Syndicate

Project-Based Learning and Traditional Online Teaching of Research Methods During COVID-19: An Investigation of Research Self-Efficacy and Student Satisfaction

Development and evaluation of a training curriculum to engage researchers on accessing and analyzing the All of Us data

Evaluation of an online research best practices training for community health workers and promotoras

Assessing resident experience of a new experiential learning health advocacy curriculum: a mixed methods study

Results of a Virtual Multi-Institutional Program for Quality Improvement Training and Project Facilitation

Outcomes of an Online Virtual Boot Camp to Prepare Fourth-Year Medical Students for a Successful Transition to Internship

Teaching Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Tailoring Virtual Learning for Public Health and Cancer Health Disparities Education

A systematic review and meta-analysis of online versus alternative methods for training licensed health care professionals to deliver clinical interventions

A Fully Online Research Practicum Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Students: A Protocol Paper

When educators are locked down: transitioning an international faculty development program from in-person to online during the COVID-19 pandemic in China

Learning effect of online versus onsite education in health and medical scholarship - protocol for a cluster randomized trial