Evaluation of an online research best practices training for community health workers and promotoras

Susan L Murphy,Gina M Jay,Elias M Samuels,Brenda L Eakin,Alexandra E Harper,Gretchen A Piatt,Vanessa I Trujillo,Kristen L Weeks-Norton,Catherine W Striley,Catina O'Leary,Jordan Hahn,Daphne C Watkins,Linda B Cottler,Sergio Aguilar Gaxiola
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.624
2023-09-05
Abstract:Introduction: Community health workers and promotoras (CHW/Ps) have a fundamental role in facilitating research with communities. However, no national standard training exists as part of the CHW/P job role. We developed and evaluated a culturally- and linguistically tailored online research best practices course for CHW/Ps to meet this gap. Methods: After the research best practices course was developed, we advertised the opportunity to CHW/Ps nationwide to complete the training online in English or Spanish. Following course completion, CHW/Ps received an online survey to rate their skills in community-engaged research and their perceptions of the course using Likert scales of agreement. A qualitative content analysis was conducted on open-ended response data. Results: 104 CHW/Ps completed the English or Spanish course (n = 52 for each language; mean age 42 years SD ± 12); 88% of individuals identified as female and 56% identified as Hispanic, Latino, or Spaniard. 96%-100% of respondents reported improvement in various skills. Nearly all CHW/Ps (97%) agreed the course was relevant to their work, and 96% felt the training was useful. Qualitative themes related to working more effectively as a result of training included enhanced skills, increased resources, and building bridges between communities and researchers. Discussion: The CHW/P research best practices course was rated as useful and relevant by CHW/Ps, particularly for communicating about research with community members. This course can be a professional development resource for CHW/Ps and could serve as the foundation for a national standardized training on their role related to research best practices.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?