Abstract:Background: An important task in obstetrics is to offer patients adequate pain management after vaginal delivery (VD) and after cesarean section (CS). The aim of the present analysis was to assess pain intensity at the day after childbirth, after 3 and 6 months in women after VD and after CS. Additionally, it was planned to identify determinants of maternal satisfaction with acute pain therapy following VD and CS. Methods: This secondary analysis of a single-center prospective cohort study included 210 parturients. The women gave birth in the University Hospital of Wuerzburg. They completed a survey before childbirth (P), on the first day (D1), 3 and 6 months after VD and CS. The survey included questions about the expected pain, the experienced pain, the birth, the pain afterwards and also psychological questionnaires. In addition, information was collected from the patient records. Women with planned CS received spinal anesthesia. A secondary CS was performed with an epidural, spinal or general anesthesia. Pain therapy on the ward was standardized. The primary outcomes were acute and chronic pain intensity at rest, during movement, determinants of satisfaction with pain therapy and the wish to have received more pain medication during and after VD and CS (D1). Results: A total of 175 women completed the survey at all time points and were available for the analysis (drop-out 16.8%). The results confirmed high pain levels at D1 after CS (median pain intensity during movement: 8 NRS points, interquartile range, IQR 6-9 points). After VD pain scores were much lower (median pain intensity during movement: 4 points, IQR 2-5 points). Of the mothers 7.4% reported pain at rest at all time points after VD or CS but pain intensity was low after 3 and 6 months (median pain intensity at rest: 2 points, IQR 0-3 points), 28% received extended-release opioids after CS and 33% of women (VD and CS) had an epidural. The most important influencing factor for lower satisfaction with pain therapy after CS or VD was inadequate pain relief. Women with VD who had an epidural, were more satisfied during delivery than women without but there was no difference at D1. Discussion: This study confirmed high acute pain levels following CS and an incidence of chronic pain of around 7% but pain intensity was low and one third received strong opioids after CS. Around 11% of women after primary CS (8% epidural, 3% combined spinal/epidural) and around 55% of women after secondary CS had an epidural, which could be used for pain therapy after birth. Women without an epidural or without opioids may not have had good pain management. The received pain relief appeared to be the most relevant predictor for satisfaction and the wish to have received more pain medication. Mothers having a VD with an epidural catheter were more satisfied with pain therapy during birth than those without. Therefore, a better multimodal pain management (including opioids, epidural and nonopioids) might provide better pain relief and might improve overall satisfaction with pain treatment following CS. Finally, the received pain relief might be a better patient-related outcome measure for satisfaction with pain treatment after childbirth than pain intensity alone.

Letter in response to: "Upper back, neck and shoulder pain during labor epidural analgesia: A quality improvement initiative"

Upper back, neck, and shoulder pain during labor epidural analgesia: a quality improvement initiative

[Epidural analgesia for painless delivery. Our experience]

Quality of analgesic care in labor: A cross‐sectional study of the first national register‐based benchmarking system

Patient controlled epidural analgesia during labor: Protocol for a scoping review

High Dosage of Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) with Low Background Infusion During Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of efficacy and safety of three different concentrations of ropivacaine for labor pain management using patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA): A double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Establishment of Labor Epidural Analgesia Service and its Assessment: An Experience in a Hospital of a Middle-Income Country

Epidural analgesia in primigravidae in spontaneous labour at term: a prospective study

Effect of different analgesia on pain relief during labor]

Effects of different neuraxial analgesia modalities on the need for physician interventions in labour

Interscapular pain associated with neuraxial labour analgesia: a case series

Analyzing Substance Levels and Pain Perception in Painless Labor: The Impact of Spinal Epidural Analgesia

Influence of Changing Background Mode of Epidural Analgesia Drug on Pregnancy Outcome

Factors influencing the use of epidural labor analgesia: a cross-sectional survey analysis

Determinants of satisfaction with acute pain therapy during and after childbirth

Influences of Initiation of Epidural Analgesia Pain Relief in Early Labor on Uterine Myoelectrical Activity

Effects of labor analgesia on maternal and neonatal outcome by epidural low concentration of bupivacaine combined with anisodamine

The impact of patient controlled epidural analgesia on the outcome of delivery

Prevalence of Cesarean Section and Analysis of Neonatal Apgar Score and the Mean Time of Second Phase of Labor in Pregnant Women

Assessment of awareness and attitudes of pregnant women toward labor epidural analgesia and factors influencing the decision to opt for it: A cross-sectional study.