Effect of labor epidural analgesia on the occurrence of postpartum depression in women intending to deliver vaginally
Zhuang Jingwen,Liu Chao,Zuo Ronghua,Chen Qianmin,Wang Zhiping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn321761-20220317-00584
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore the effect of labor epidural analgesia (LEA) on the occurrence of postpartum depression (PPD) in women intending to deliver vaginally.Methods:A total of 705 women who intended to deliver vaginally were enrolled. At 2-3 cm cervical dilation, they were allowed to choose whether to accept LEA or not. For those with emergency cesarean section (EmCS) indications during trial delivery, the obstetrician made the decision whether to convert to cesarean section (CS). The parturient women were divided into four groups according to the use of LEA during childbirth and the final delivery method: a vaginal delivery with LEA group (group V/LEA, n=302), a natural vaginal delivery group (group V/NLEA, n=143), a cesarean delivery after failed attempt of trial delivery with LEA group (group T/LEA, n=85), and a cesarean delivery after failed attempt of natural vaginal delivery (group T/NLEA, n=47). Their demographic data, pre-pregnancy history, pregnant conditions, prenatal data (including psychological scales) and maternal spouse data were collected. The highest Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score during delivery, blood loss volume, accompaniment during childbirth and newborn conditions were recorded. On the first day after delivery, rooming-in for new mother and infant, close contact between mother and infant, 1-day NRS score and nursing satisfaction were recorded. The Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) was used to assess the occurrence of PPD at the third month postpartum. To explore the effect of LEA on the occurrence of PPD for the parturient women with successful vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery after failed attempt of trial delivery. The related risk factors of PPD were analyzed by logistic regression. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to fit the effects. Results:There were statistical differences in age, the proportion of primiparas, blood loss volume, and the highest NRS score among the four groups ( P<0.05); the labor time and episiotomy rate were statistically different between group V/LEA and group V/NLEA ( P<0.05). There were statistical differences in the degree of cervical dilation before cesarean delivery between group T/LEA and group T/NLEA ( P<0.05), while there were no statistical differences in other indicators ( P>0.05). The three-month follow-up results showed that the total incidence of PPD at the third month postpartum was 28.4%. After secondary analysis and adjusting for confounding factors between groups, no association was found between the use of LEA and PPD [adjusted odds ratio ( OR) 0.774, 95%CI (0.469, 1.276), P=0.315]. Logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors of PPD in women intending to vaginal delivery included chronic pain during pregnancy, high prenatal EPDS scores, high Zung's Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) scores, low Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) scored, no accompaniment during childbirth, and high 1-day NRS score after delivery ( P<0.05). These factors were adopted to fit a logistic regression model and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted, with the area under curve (AUC) of 0.881, 95%CI (0.851, 0.911). Conclusions:The use of LEA does not reduce the risk of PPD in women intending to deliver vaginally. Chronic pain during pregnancy, high EPDS and SAS scores, low SSRS scores, no accompaniment during childbirth, and high 1-day NRS score are the independent risk factors of PPD.