Abstract:It has been said that 'God invented plasticity, but the Devil invented fracture!' Both mechanisms represent the two prime modes of structural failure, respectively, plastic collapse and the rupture/breaking of a component, but the concept of developing materials with enhanced resistance to fracture can be difficult. This is because fracture resistance invariably involves a compromise-between strength and ductility, between strength and toughness-fundamentally leading to a 'conflict' between nano-/micro-structural damage and the mechanisms of toughening. Here, we examine the two major classes of such toughening: (i) intrinsic toughening, which occurs ahead of a crack tip and is motivated by plasticity-this is the principal mode of fracture resistance in ductile materials, and (ii) extrinsic toughening, which occurs at, or in the wake of, a crack tip and is associated with crack-tip shielding-this is generally the sole mode of fracture resistance in brittle materials. We briefly examine how these distinct mechanistic processes have been used to toughen synthetic materials-intrinsically in gradient materials and in multiple principal-element metallic alloys with the example of metallic glasses and high-entropy alloys, and extrinsically in ceramics with the example of ceramic-matrix composites-in comparison to Nature which has been especially adept in creating biological/natural materials which are toughened by one or both mechanistic classes, despite often consisting of constituents with meagre mechanical properties. The success of Nature has been driven by its ability to cultivate the development of materials with multiple length-scale hierarchical structures that display ingenious gradients and structural adaptability, a philosophy which we need to emulate and more importantly learn to synthesize to make structural materials of the future with unprecedented combinations of mechanical properties. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'A cracking approach to inventing new tough materials: fracture stranger than friction'.

Concurrent factors determine toughening in the hydraulic fracture of poroelastic composites

Poroelastic toughening in polymer gels: A theoretical and numerical study

Monte Carlo simulation of complex cohesive fracture in random heterogeneous quasi-brittle materials

Monte Carlo Simulation of Complex 2D Cohesive Fracture in Random Heterogeneous Quasi-Brittle Materials

Phase field fracture predictions of microscopic bridging behaviour of composite materials

Modeling Microfracture Evolution in Heterogeneous Composites: A Coupled Cohesive Phase-Field Model

Complexity of crack front geometry enhances toughness of brittle solids

Fluid-solid interaction in the rate-dependent failure of brain tissue and biomimicking gels

Toughening materials: enhancing resistance to fracture

Cohesive Zone Modeling of the Interface Fracture in Full-Thermoplastic Hybrid Composites for Lightweight Application

Modeling of Compression-Induced Splitting Failure in Heterogeneous Brittle Porous,Solids

Failure through crack propagation in components with holes and notches: An experimental assessment of the phase field model

Hydro-mechanical network modelling of particulate composites

High-fidelity-generalized-method-of-cells micromechanical analysis of damage evolution in viscoelastic composites

An Interplay Between the Weakening and Strengthening Effects of Interstitial Water on the Strength of Porous Brittle Solids

Size effects in the toughening of brittle materials by heterogeneities: a non-linear analysis of front deformations

Modeling of Crack Bridging and Failure in Heterogeneous Composite Materials: A Damage-Plastic Multiphase Model

On the Fracture Toughness of Advanced Materials

Effective toughness of heterogeneous materials with rate-dependent fracture energy

Effects of interfacial debonding on the stability of finitely strained periodic microstructured elastic composites

Fracture toughness of mixed-mode anticracks in highly porous materials