Abstract:Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of different endoscopic surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to 31 March 2019. Study selection Randomised controlled trials comparing vapourisation, resection, and enucleation of the prostate using monopolar, bipolar, or various laser systems (holmium, thulium, potassium titanyl phosphate, or diode) as surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The primary outcomes were the maximal flow rate (Qmax) and international prostate symptoms score (IPSS) at 12 months after surgical treatment. Secondary outcomes were Qmax and IPSS values at 6, 24, and 36 months after surgical treatment; perioperative parameters; and surgical complications. Data extraction and synthesis Two independent reviewers extracted the study data and performed quality assessments using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The effect sizes were summarised using weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes and odds ratios for binary outcomes. Frequentist approach to the network meta-analysis was used to estimate comparative effects and safety. Ranking probabilities of each treatment were also calculated. Results 109 trials with a total of 13 676 participants were identified. Nine surgical treatments were evaluated. Enucleation achieved better Qmax and IPSS values than resection and vapourisation methods at six and 12 months after surgical treatment, and the difference maintained up to 24 and 36 months after surgical treatment. For Qmax at 12 months after surgical treatment, the best three methods compared with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were bipolar enucleation (mean difference 2.42 mL/s (95% confidence interval 1.11 to 3.73)), diode laser enucleation (1.86 (−0.17 to 3.88)), and holmium laser enucleation (1.07 (0.07 to 2.08)). The worst performing method was diode laser vapourisation (−1.90 (−5.07 to 1.27)). The results of IPSS at 12 months after treatment were similar to Qmax at 12 months after treatment. The best three methods, versus monopolar TURP, were diode laser enucleation (mean difference −1.00 (−2.41 to 0.40)), bipolar enucleation (0.87 (−1.80 to 0.07)), and holmium laser enucleation (−0.84 (−1.51 to 0.58)). The worst performing method was diode laser vapourisation (1.30 (−1.16 to 3.76)). Eight new methods were better at controlling bleeding than monopolar TURP, resulting in a shorter catheterisation duration, reduced postoperative haemoglobin declination, fewer clot retention events, and lower blood transfusion rate. However, short term transient urinary incontinence might still be a concern for enucleation methods, compared with resection methods (odds ratio 1.92, 1.39 to 2.65). No substantial inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence was detected in primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusion Eight new endoscopic surgical methods for benign prostatic hyperplasia appeared to be superior in safety compared with monopolar TURP. Among these new treatments, enucleation methods showed better Qmax and IPSS values than vapourisation and resection methods. Study registration CRD42018099583.

[Surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia-resection, vaporization or enucleation?]

AB101. Diversity and Choice in the Surgical Techniques for Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy

Six Novel Minimally Invasive Therapies for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

The Choice of the Method of Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Obstruction – What Should We Focus on?

Enucleation, Vaporization, and Resection: How To Choose the Best Surgical Treatment Option for a Patient with Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Comparative efficacy and safety of new surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Which Laser Works Best for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia?

Comparison on the Efficacy and Safety of Different Surgical Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Volume >60 Ml: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Contemporary surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical re-treatment after prostatic urethral lift A narrative review

Pharmacological and interventional treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: An evidence-based comparative review

Ablative minimally invasive surgical therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A review of Aquablation, Rezum, and transperineal laser prostate ablation

Vaporize, anatomically vaporize or enucleate the prostate? The flexible use of the GreenLight laser

Evaluating the Impact of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgical Treatments on Sexual Health

Surgical Complications in the Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatment

Discussion of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery Indication and Selection of Therapies

Reoperation after Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: a Systematic Review.

What is the standard surgical approach to large volume BPE? Systematic review of existing randomized clinical trials

The role of novel minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Complications of laser prostatectomy: a review of recent data

Critical Reviews of 1470-Nm Laser Vaporization on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.