Abstract:1 Biogeographical models of species’ distributions are essential tools for assessing impacts of changing environmental conditions on natural communities and ecosystems. Practitioners need more reliable predictions to integrate into conservation planning (e.g. reserve design and management). 2 Most models still largely ignore or inappropriately take into account important features of species’ distributions, such as spatial autocorrelation, dispersal and migration, biotic and environmental interactions. Whether distributions of natural communities or ecosystems are better modelled by assembling individual species’ predictions in a bottom‐up approach or modelled as collective entities is another important issue. An international workshop was organized to address these issues. 3 We discuss more specifically six issues in a methodological framework for generalized regression: (i) links with ecological theory; (ii) optimal use of existing data and artificially generated data; (iii) incorporating spatial context; (iv) integrating ecological and environmental interactions; (v) assessing prediction errors and uncertainties; and (vi) predicting distributions of communities or collective properties of biodiversity. 4 Synthesis and applications. Better predictions of the effects of impacts on biological communities and ecosystems can emerge only from more robust species’ distribution models and better documentation of the uncertainty associated with these models. An improved understanding of causes of species’ distributions, especially at their range limits, as well as of ecological assembly rules and ecosystem functioning, is necessary if further progress is to be made. A better collaborative effort between theoretical and functional ecologists, ecological modellers and statisticians is required to reach these goals. Biogeographical models of species’ distributions are essential tools for assessing impacts of changing environmental conditions on natural communities and ecosystems. Practitioners need more reliable predictions to integrate into conservation planning (e.g. reserve design and management). Most models still largely ignore or inappropriately take into account important features of species’ distributions, such as spatial autocorrelation, dispersal and migration, biotic and environmental interactions. Whether distributions of natural communities or ecosystems are better modelled by assembling individual species’ predictions in a bottom‐up approach or modelled as collective entities is another important issue. An international workshop was organized to address these issues. We discuss more specifically six issues in a methodological framework for generalized regression: (i) links with ecological theory; (ii) optimal use of existing data and artificially generated data; (iii) incorporating spatial context; (iv) integrating ecological and environmental interactions; (v) assessing prediction errors and uncertainties; and (vi) predicting distributions of communities or collective properties of biodiversity. Synthesis and applications. Better predictions of the effects of impacts on biological communities and ecosystems can emerge only from more robust species’ distribution models and better documentation of the uncertainty associated with these models. An improved understanding of causes of species’ distributions, especially at their range limits, as well as of ecological assembly rules and ecosystem functioning, is necessary if further progress is to be made. A better collaborative effort between theoretical and functional ecologists, ecological modellers and statisticians is required to reach these goals.

Ru-Catalyzed Redox-Neutral Cleavage of the N-O Bond in Isoxazolidines: Isatogens to Pseudoindoxyls via a One-Pot [3 + 2]-Cycloaddition/N-O Cleavage.

On How Data Are Partitioned in Model Development and Evaluation: Confronting the Elephant in the Room to Enhance Model Generalization.

Statistical inference methods for n‐dimensional hypervolumes: Applications to niches and functional diversity

Multilevel mixed-effect models to predict wood volume in a hyperdiverse Amazon forest

Evaluating the Benefits of Bayesian Hierarchical Methods for Analyzing Heterogeneous Environmental Datasets: A Case Study of Marine Organic Carbon Fluxes

Spatiotemporal modelling of abundance from multiple data sources in an integrated spatial distribution model

Parameter space exploration of ecological models

Predicting Whole Forest Structure, Primary Productivity, and Biomass Density From Maximum Tree Size and Resource Limitations

The shadow model: how and why small choices in spatially explicit species distribution models affect predictions

Modeling the topographic influence on aboveground biomass using a coupled model of hillslope hydrology and ecosystem dynamics

Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology

Joint hierarchical models for sparsely sampled high-dimensional LiDAR and forest variables

Spatial heterogeneity of global forest aboveground carbon stocks and fluxes constrained by spaceborne lidar data and mechanistic modeling

[On the significance of some aging processes of the masticatory organ and their relationship to dental prosthesis].

Application of the Metabolic Scaling Theory and Water–energy Balance Equation to Model Large‐scale Patterns of Maximum Forest Canopy Height

Downscaling Vapor Pressure Deficit across Complex Forested Terrain

Structural Uncertainty in Models Projecting the Consequences of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation on Biodiversity

Latent Variable Modelling with Hyperbolic Normalizing Flows

Spatial maximum entropy modeling from presence/absence tropical forest data

Making better biogeographical predictions of species' distributions

Spatial Factor Modeling: A Bayesian Matrix-Normal Approach for Misaligned Data