Genic mutants with altered system of excitation in Paramecium aurelia. II. Mutagenesis, screening and genetic analysis of the mutants.

C. Kung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/GENETICS/69.1.29
IF: 4.402
1971-09-01
Genetics
Abstract:HE development of behavioral genetics in Paramecium aurelia reported here Tis part of an attempt to dissect the system of behavioral control centering on the excitable membrane. Molecular lesions can be produced in cells by mutagenesis. Mutants can then be screened for behavioral deviations which indicate lesions in the excitable system. By studying the phenotypic expression behaviorally and electrophysiologically, one can try to understand the relation between the mutated molecular entities and the normal function of the system. It may also be possible to identify the mutated molecules using available immunological and biochemical techniques. While the rationale behind this work is the same as BENZER’S (1967), the level of study is quite different from the genetic dissection of the nervous system. The pellicular fibrils in ciliates have apparently no function in coordinating ciliary beats (OKAJIMA and KINOSITA 1966; NAITOH and ECKERT 196913) as had been previously suggested (TAYLOR 1920), and are thus a poor analog of the central nervous system of multicellular forms. On the other hand, these eukaryotes can be viewed as excitable cells capable of generating receptor potentials and action potentials (KINOSITA, DRYL and NAITOH 1964a, 1964b; NAITOH and ECKERT 1968a, 1968b, 1969a) upon proper electrical, mechanical and chemical stimulations. Protozoa are thus comparable to excitable cells such as neurons, muscle fibers and hair cells in metazoa. Paramecium as an experimental material for such study offers the following advantages: 1. Paramecium behaves relatively stereotypically (JENNINGS 1906). The locomotor behavior of the organism reflects the electrical behavior of the membrane. Ciliary reversal (hence, backward swimming) is correlated with membrane depolarization, whereas augmented ciliary beat in the normal direction (rapid forward swimming) is correlated with hyperpolarization (KINOSITA, DRYL and NAITOH 1964a, 196413). Changes in membrane (and other structural components involved in movement) by mutation will appear as changes in behavior. Thus,
What problem does this paper attempt to address?