Abstract:Objectives: The objectives of the study were to (1) evaluate the impact of hearing loss on children's ability to benefit from F0 differences between target/masker speech in the context of aided speech-in-speech recognition and (2) to determine whether compromised F0 discrimination associated with hearing loss predicts F0 benefit in individual children. We hypothesized that children wearing appropriately fitted amplification would benefit from F0 differences, but they would not show the same magnitude of benefit as children with normal hearing. Reduced audibility and poor suprathreshold encoding that degrades frequency discrimination were expected to impair children's ability to segregate talkers based on F0. Design: Listeners were 9 to 17 year olds with bilateral, symmetrical, sensorineural hearing loss ranging in degree from mild to severe. A four-alternative, forced-choice procedure was used to estimate thresholds for disyllabic word recognition in a 60-dB-SPL two-talker masker. The same male talker produced target and masker speech. Target words had either the same mean F0 as the masker or were digitally shifted higher than the masker by three, six, or nine semitones. The F0 benefit was defined as the difference in thresholds between the shifted-F0 conditions and the unshifted-F0 condition. Thresholds for discriminating F0 were also measured, using a three-alternative, three-interval forced choice procedure, to determine whether compromised sensitivity to F0 differences due to hearing loss would predict children's ability to benefit from F0. Testing was performed in the sound field, and all children wore their personal hearing aids at user settings. Results: Children with hearing loss benefited from an F0 difference of nine semitones between target words and masker speech, with older children generally benefitting more than younger children. Some children benefitted from an F0 difference of six semitones, but this was not consistent across listeners. Thresholds for discriminating F0 improved with increasing age and predicted F0 benefit in the nine-semitone condition. An exploratory analysis indicated that F0 benefit was not significantly correlated with the four-frequency pure-tone average (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz), aided audibility, or consistency of daily hearing aid use, although there was a trend for an association with the low-frequency pure-tone average (0.25 and 0.5 kHz). Comparisons of the present data to our previous study of children with normal hearing demonstrated that children with hearing loss benefitted less than children with normal hearing for the F0 differences tested. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that children with mild-to-severe hearing loss who wear hearing aids benefit from relatively large F0 differences between target and masker speech during aided speech-in-speech recognition. The size of the benefit increases with increasing age, consistent with previously reported age effects for children with normal hearing. However, hearing loss reduces children's ability to capitalize on F0 differences between talkers. Audibility alone does not appear to be responsible for this effect; aided audibility and degree of loss were not primary predictors of performance. The ability to benefit from F0 differences may be limited by immature central processing or aspects of peripheral encoding that are not characterized in standard clinical assessments.

Envelope frequency following responses are stronger for high-pass than low-pass filtered vowels

Improved Detection of Vowel Envelope Frequency Following Responses Using Hotelling's T2 Analysis

Using Frequency-Following Responses (ffrs) to Evaluate the Auditory Function of Frequency-Modulation (FM) Discrimination

Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on formant-frequency discrimination: Measurements and models

Reflection of pitch following accuracy with frequency following response

Evaluation of a Posteriori Wiener Filtering Applied to Frequency-Following Response Extraction in the Auditory Brainstem

Extended high-frequency pure-tone thresholds predict speech-in-speech recognition even when extended high-frequency speech cues are absent

Neural Envelope Processing at Low Frequencies Predicts Speech Understanding of Children With Hearing Loss in Noise and Reverberation

Envelope following responses predict speech-in-noise performance in normal-hearing listeners

Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with a single formant

Frequency-Following Responses to Complex Tones at Different Frequencies Reflect Different Source Configurations

Binaural responses to a speech syllable are altered in children with hearing loss: Evidence from the frequency-following response

Frequency-Following Responses in Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review

Frequency Difference Beyond Behavioral Limen Reflected by Frequency Following Response of Human Auditory Brainstem

Speech Frequency-Following Response in Human Auditory Cortex is More Than a Simple Tracking

Effects of Hearing Loss on School-Aged Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech

Effects of Phase-Locking Deficits on Speech Recognition in Older Adults with Presbycusis

Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability

Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with two formants

Pitch perception assessed by frequency difference limen and frequency following response

Brainstem Encoding of Frequency-Modulated Sweeps is Relevant to Mandarin Concurrent-Vowels Identification for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.