Abstract:Objectives: Cross-language studies, as reflected by the scalp-recorded frequency-following response (FFR) to voice pitch, have shown the influence of dominant linguistic environments on the encoding of voice pitch at the brainstem level in normal-hearing adults. Research questions that remained unanswered included the characteristics of the FFR to voice pitch in neonates during their immediate postnatal period and the relative contributions of the biological capacities present at birth versus the influence of the listener's postnatal linguistic experience. The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of FFR to voice pitch in neonates during their first few days of life and to examine the relative contributions of the "biological capacity" versus "linguistic experience" influences on pitch processing in the human brainstem.Design: Twelve American neonates (five males, 1-3 days old) and 12 Chinese neonates (seven males, 1-3 days old) were recruited to examine the characteristics of the FFRs during their immediate postnatal days of life. Twelve American adults (three males; age: mean +/- SD = 24.6 +/- 3.0 yr) and 12 Chinese adults (six males; age: mean +/- SD = 25.3 +/- 2.6 yr) were also recruited to determine the relative contributions of biological and linguistic influences. A Chinese monosyllable that mimics the English vowel /i/ with a rising pitch (117-166 Hz) was used to elicit the FFR to voice pitch in all participants.Results: Two-way analysis of variance (i.e., the language [English versus Chinese] and age [neonate versus adult] factors) showed a significant difference in Pitch Strength for language (p = 0.035, F = 4.716). A post hoc Tukey-Kramer analysis further demonstrated that Chinese adults had significantly larger Pitch Strength values than Chinese neonates (p = 0.024). This finding, coupled with the fact that American neonates and American adults had comparable Pitch Strength values, supported the linguistic experience model. On the other hand, Pitch Strength obtained from the American neonates, American adults, and Chinese neonates were not significantly different from each other, supporting the biological capacity model.Conclusions: This study demonstrated an early maturation of voice-pitch processing in neonates starting from 1 to 3 days after birth and a significant effect of linguistic experience on the neural processing of voice pitch at the brainstem level. These findings provide a significant conceptual advancement and a basis for further examination of developmental maturation of subcortical representation of speech features, such as pitch, timing, and harmonics. These findings can also be used to help identify neonates at risk for delays in voice-pitch perception and provide new directions for preventive and therapeutic interventions for patients with central auditory processing deficits, hearing loss, and other types of communication disorders.

Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability

Using Frequency-Following Responses (ffrs) to Evaluate the Auditory Function of Frequency-Modulation (FM) Discrimination

Frequency-Following Responses to Speech Sounds Are Highly Conserved across Species and Contain Cortical Contributions

Reflection of pitch following accuracy with frequency following response

Correlation between the frequency difference limen and an index based on principal component analysis of the frequency-following response of normal hearing listeners

Revisiting discrete versus continuous models of human behavior: The case of absolute pitch

Pitch perception assessed by frequency difference limen and frequency following response

Infant Pitch and Timbre Discrimination in the Presence of Variation in the Other Dimension

Diotic and dichotic frequency discrimination thresholds in musicians and non-musicians: relationships between perception, musical ability and self-evaluated competence

Factors affecting frequency discrimination in school-aged children and adults

Dynamics of pitch perception in the auditory cortex

Machine Learning Recognizes Frequency-Following Responses in American Adults: Effects of Reference Spectrogram and Stimulus Token

Distributed Network with Independent Cortical and Brainstem Contributions Underlies Pitch Perception of Pure Tones: ERP Evidence

Individual differences in the consistency of neural and behavioural responses to speech sounds

Frequency Difference Beyond Behavioral Limen Reflected by Frequency Following Response of Human Auditory Brainstem

Pitch expertise is not created equal: Cross-domain effects of musicianship and tone language experience on neural and behavioural discrimination of speech and music

Testing Native Language Neural Commitment at the Brainstem Level: A Cross-Linguistic Investigation of the Association Between Frequency-Following Response and Speech Perception.

Context-dependent Plasticity and Strength of Subcortical Encoding of Musical Sounds Independently Underlie Pitch Discrimination for Music Melodies.

Frequency-Following Responses to Complex Tones at Different Frequencies Reflect Different Source Configurations

Lifelong Tone Language Experience Does Not Eliminate Deficits in Neural Encoding of Pitch in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Cross-Linguistic Comparison of Frequency-Following Responses to Voice Pitch in American and Chinese Neonates and Adults