From the History of the Croatian Dermatovenereological Society - The Croatian Medical Association and an Overview of Important Information Regarding the Journal Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica
Ivan Dobrić
Abstract:Everything included in this overview is a list of facts without analyses, which makes this a purely factual overview. The circumstances of the preparation for the foundation of the Croatian Dermatovenereological Society - the Croatian Medical Association (hereafter CDS-CMA) and the journal Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica (hereafter ADC) Geopolitical changes in former Yugoslavia following 1990 and the Homeland War (1991-1995) led to new circumstances in almost all areas of social activity and the need for a restructuring and further development of professional physicians associations in our Homeland. In such new conditions, it was necessary to appropriately organize the professional work of our dermatovenerologists with the aim of founding and maintaining their professional ties to each other and to our colleagues abroad. The aforementioned appropriate organization primarily meant the founding of the Croatian Dermatological Society and the journal for Croatian dermatovenerologists, the first professional journal in the history of dermatology and venerology in our Homeland. Legal regulations for the founding of CDS-CMA and the journal ADC The legal regulations resulted from the conclusions and decisions of the 99th annual assembly of the Association of Croatian Physicians (hereafter ACP) that took place on the 26th of February 1991 (1), at which, at the suggestion of Prof. Mirko Gjurašin, PhD, the president of CMA, it was renamed to the Croatian Medical Association (CMA). Furthermore, on the basis of article 12 of the Statute of CMA, the creation and activity of professional societies of CMA was enabled, which replaced the Sections of ACP (1), and soon there appeared the Regulation of the work of the professional society of CMA. Finally, on the 30th of September 1991, CMA left the Alliance of Yugoslav Medical Societies (1). More detailed information on the aforementioned events can be found in reference 1, and the data on historical, political, national, and military aspects of the war against our Homeland can be found in the article of the esteemed member of CMA, Prof. Eduard Klain, PhD (2) and in the message by Prof. Vladimir Čajkovac, PhD (3). Preparations for the founding of CDS-CMA and ADC Ideas concerning a new founding of the Croatian Dermatological Society - CMA (hereafter CDS-CMA) and the first journal in the history of Croatian dermatovenerologists developed during 1990 and 1991. These suggestions were discussed in the meetings of the Professional college of the Department of Dermatology and Venerology at the Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb (hereafter CHC Zagreb), and were formed at the meeting of the Professional college of the Department on the 27th of January 1992, when the Professional college provided the following suggestions, which the secretary of the Dermatovenerological Section of CMA (Primarius D. Paljan, MD, MSc) gave to the president of the Dermatovenerological section of CMA, Prof. V. Čajkovac, PhD. The suggestions were as follows: 1) for the Dermatovenerological section of CMA to leave the Association of Yugoslav dermatologists; 2) to found a Croatian Dermatological Society; 3) to found a Croatian Journal of Dermatology; and 4) to inform colleagues from clinics abroad with the state in Croatia. Of course, Prof. Čajkovac immediately agreed with all of these suggestions. Afterwards, on the 9th of October 1991, I presented the members of the Professional college of the Department of Dermatology and Venerology of CHC Zagreb and the members of the Chair of Dermatovenerology at the School of Medicine, University of Zagreb (hereafter SM Univ. of Zagreb), with the suggestions regarding the founding of the Croatian Dermatological Society - CMA and the founding of a Journal of Croatian Dermatologists (4,5). Both suggestions were accepted unanimously (4). After accepting the abovementioned suggestions, my colleagues and I undertook a number of consultations, and from the Department of Dermatology and Venerology of CHC Zagreb I sent out invitations to all the members of the Dermatovenerological Section of ACP (hereafter Section) to a meeting in the lecture room of the Clinic on Šalata, scheduled for the 29th of May 1992 (6). At that meeting, I notified the members of the Section of the decisions made at the 99th annual assembly of CMA on the 26th of February 1991, as well as of the fact that the CMA had left the Alliance of Yugoslav Physicians Societies on the 30th of September 1991 (6). Also, following the example of many other medical professions, I told the members of the Section about my suggestion regarding the founding of CDS-CMA. Therefore, on the 29th of May 1992, CDS-CMA was founded again* (6). On that occasion, a temporary Board of directors of CDS-CMA was also chosen, and Prof. Vladimir Čajkovac, who was the president of the former Dermatovenerological Section of ACP, was chosen as the president of the Board (6), while the following were chosen as members of the Board (6): Primarius Zlatka Čabrijan, MD (Rijeka), Adalbert Stašić, MSc, MD (Rijeka), Assist. Prof. Vjekoslav Stipić, PhD (Split), Primarius Boris Petričić, MD (Zadar), Prof. Ivan Dobrić, PhD (Zagreb), Assist. Prof. Teodora Gregurek-Novak,PhD (Zagreb), Primarius Jasna Lesić, PhD (Zagreb), and Primarius Aida Pašić, MD (Zagreb). Titles according to the state in 1992. *Why was CDS-CMA founded again? To understand this question, it is important to know the following: a) On the 22nd of November 1920, the Dermatological Section of the Physicians Association (7) was founded in the Hospital Sestre milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia (quotation from reference 7); b) this Section acted until the 19th of January 1941, when a formal session was held in the lecture room of the Clinic on Šalata under the title of the 1st (jubilee) meeting of the Croatian Dermatovenerological Society of the Croatian Medical Association, which was opened by its president, Prof. Kogoj (7); c) therefore, it is apparent that the Croatian Dermatovenerological Society of the Croatian Medical Association was founded on the 19th of January 1941, and the forerunner of the Society was the former Dermatological Section of the Physicians Association (7); the name Croatian Dermatovenerological Society of CMA has been used in professional publications since then (8); d) at the extraordinary session of the Croatian Physicians Society (probably a reference to ACP) held on the 30th of September 1945, the name of the Association of Croatian Physicians was changed to the name Croatian Medical Association, and since then the Croatian Dermatovenerological Society has appeared in professional publications under the name of the Dermatovenerological Society of the Croatian Medical Association (9); e) later the name Dermatovenerological Society - CMA was replaced with the name Dermatovenerological Section of ACP, but I am not familiar with the exact date of this change; f) the name Dermatovenerological Section of ACP existed until the 29th of May 1992, when, as it was stated above, the CDS-CMA was founded (6). NOTE: The original name of the Society founded on the 29th of May 1992 was the Croatian Dermatological Society of the Croatian Medical Association (CDS-CMA), and later this name was changed to the Croatian Dermatovenerological Society of the Croatian Medical Association (CDVS-CMA), which is the name used by the Society nowadays. The election of the Assembly and the regular Board of Directors of CDS-CMA On the 10th of July 1992, in the same lecture room in which the meeting was held on the 29th of May 1992, there was a meeting on the newly founded CDS-CMA (6). According to the book of regulations of the CMA, which was established over time, the Assembly of CDS-CMA was elected, and at the suggestion of the Assembly the following attending colleagues were elected to the regular Board of Directors of CDS-CMA, along with Prof. Vladimir Čajkovac as the president (6): Primarius Zlatka Čabrijan, MD (Rijeka), Adalbert Stašić, MD, MSc (Rijeka), Assist. Prof. Vjekoslav Stipić, PhD (Split), Primarius Boris Petričić, MD (Zadar), Prof. Ivan Dobrić, PhD (Zagreb), Assist. Prof. Teodora Gregurek-Novak, PhD (Zagreb), Primarius Jasna Lesić, PhD (Zagreb), and Primarius Aida Pašić, MD (Zagreb). Titles according to the state in 1992. Branches of CDS-CMA As we can see, colleagues from all university centers existing at the time (Osijek, Rijeka, Split, and Zagreb) were elected to the Board of Directors, in which Branches of CDS-CMA were later founded. Therefore, from the beginning of the creation of CDS-CMA, it has been our goal to found CDS-CMA with four Branches (Osijek, Rijeka, Split, and Zagreb), which is how the Society is structured even today. NOTE: Since there were no representatives from Osijek at the meeting held on the 10th of September 1992, the Assembly suggested that the president of CDS-CMA-Osijek Branch enter the Board of Directors after the Branch is founded (6). The election of the president, vice president, secretary, and treasurer of CDS-CMA Through a secret ballot, the members of the Assembly elected the following from among the members of the Board of Directors to a term of four years (6): Prof. Vladimir Čajkovac, PhD as the president of the Board of Directors of CDS-CMA (on the basis of the accepted work program), Prof. Ivan Dobrić, PhD and Assist. Prof. Vjekoslav Stipić, PhD as the vice president of the Board, Primarius Zlatka Čabrijan, MD and Assist. Prof. Teodora Gregurek-Novak, PhD as secretaries, and Primarius Aida Pašić, MD as the treasurer of the Board of Directors of CDS-CMA. The founding of the ADC and its organizational overview from Vol 1, No 1 to Vol 4, No 2 At the aforementioned meeting of CDS-CMA held on the 10th of July 1992 (6), I presented my suggestions from the 9th of October 1990 (4), which were accepted by the members of the Professional college of the Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb and the members of the Department of Dermatovenerology of the School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, regarding the need for founding a Journal of Croatian Dermatovenerologists, i.e. a journal of CDS entitled Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica (ADC) (4). I remind the reader that the need for founding a "professional publication" (quotation from reference 7) was expressed as early as 1920, at the founding of the Dermatological Section of ACP (7). The election of the management of the Journal Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica At the meeting held on the 10th of July 1992, the following were elected to the management of Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica (with no titles): Vladimir Čajkovac as the chief editor (with the instruction that he should choose his own co-workers) (6). Several days after the meeting of the 10th of July 1992, the following colleagues were appointed to certain positions in the journal: Ivan Dobrić as the deputy to the chief editor, Dragomir Budimčić as the technical editor, and Branko Baričević as the secretary of the journal. However, Dr. Budimčić resigned, so Branka Marinović was appointed to his position from Vol 1, No 4. After Dr. Baričević left for a position in diplomacy, Branka Marinović was elected to his position in the journal from Vol 4, No 2, while Mirna Šitum was elected to fill in the former position of Branka Marinović from Vol 4, No 2. Following the election of the journal's management and after certain consultations in the country and abroad were completed, members of the Editorial board* and the Editorial council** were also elected, as well as the language consultant and the translator for the English language***. *, **, ***: names and surnames of the elected colleagues are visible in the imprint of the listed volumes and issues of the journal. The titles of the particular colleagues are not included, with only the names and surnames stated (according to the statements in the journal's imprint) Addresses and the journal's office Addresses: - for Vol 1, No 1: Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica, Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases of the Hospital Sestre milosrdnice, Vinogradska cesta 29, Zagreb, Croatia; - from Vol 1, No 2: Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica, Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb and School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Šalata 4, Zagreb, Croatia* (see detailed information in the imprint of the listed volume and issues of the journal). The journal office Until Vol 3, No 1-2, the journal office was located on the abovementioned addresses. From Vol 3, No 1-2, a special journal office was founded, and the office manager was Ivan Dobrić, the former deputy of the chief editor, with Aleksandra Basta-Juzbašić being elected to take over Dr. Dobrić's former position from Vol 4, No 1. I. Dobrić performed the duties of the office manager until Vol 3, No 4, when this position was removed, and from Vol 4, No 1 the journal's office is yet again listed with the abovementioned address of the journal*. With the removal of the duties of the manager of the journal office, i.e. since Vol 3, No 4 (end of 1995), Prof. Dobrić no longer performed any duties in the journal, and this remains so to this day. The reason for the founding of the abovementioned office of the journal: chief editor Prof. Vladimir Čajkovac, PhD was also the head of the Department of Dermatology and Venerology of the School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, and also worked in the Hospital Sestre milosrdnice, Vinogradska cesta 29, Zagreb. However, all the duties connected to the journal (preparation, correspondence, fax, requesting article reviews, sending notifications, contacting the School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, contacting Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, contacting the printing office) were performed by the head office of the Department of Dermatology and Venerology at the Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb and the School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, which was, of course, tied to the expenses. Those expenses were charged to the Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, but for the purposes of booking the expenses, an agreement was reached with the Directorate of Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, according to which the expenses were booked to the journal's office and approved by the manager of the journal's office, who was then also the head of the Department, in accordance with the powers of the head of the Department according to the Temporary decision regarding the organization of Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb from 1991. To conclude, the existence of the journal's office and its manager was of a purely pragmatic nature at the time. (For the purposes of verifying the accuracy of the abovementioned information see the imprint of the listed volumes and issues of the journal.) The first issue of ADC (Vol 1, No 1) The first issue of the journal was published at Christmas time in 1992 (10), and It was printed in Zagrebačka tiskara (which was later renamed to Grafoplast), Preradovićeva 21-23, Zagreb. The journal's expenses were covered from the following: a) membership fees for CDS-CMA; b) donations, or subscriptions to the journal of pharmaceutical companies; c) financial support of the Ministry of Science (for the year 1994); d) the help of the Directorate of Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb; and e) financial assets from the research task "Lyme borreliosis" (leader: Prof. Dobrić). All financial business of the journal was performed through the account of the School of Medicine, University of Zagreb. Indexing the journal Thanks to all the authors who sent in their articles to our journal as well as the reviewers from our country and abroad, from January 1994 Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica is included in the Excerpta Medica Embase database. In April 1993, the journal was already a candidate for the inclusion in Current Contents. See the letter from the institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, USA, dated 8th of April 1993, Mrs. Helen Szigeti, Publication Selection (Figure 2). Special thanks In the name of former associates, I extend a special thank you for the preparation for the founding of CDS-CMA to the following: a) All members of the Department and Clinic for Dermatology and Venerology of Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb and the School of Medicine, University of Zagreb (who are listed in reference 5), as well as all colleagues from the former Dermatovenerological Section of ACP who accepted the invitation to the meeting held on the 29th of May 1992. Of course, I hereby also extend my gratitude to all those colleagues who did not attend that meeting, but explained their absence in a way that was then appropriate; b) Prof. Klaus Wolff, MD, the president of the Executive Board of the International League of Dermatological Societies, who allowed me to follow the work of the Assembly of Delegates of the International League of Dermatological Societies as a delegate of CDS-CMA (on the basis of a previously signed agreement) (New York, the 15th of July 1992); c) Prof. Stuart Maddin, MD, the general secretary of the Executive Board of the International League of Dermatological Societies, who I met with in New York some time before the beginning of the abovementioned Assembly. On that occasion, Prof. Maddin gave me many useful pieces of advice on the work of CDS-CMA and ADC (11). NOTE: Prof. Mario Gligora, PhD (an active participant at the 18th World Congress of Dermatology, New York, 1992, 12-18 June) also visited New York at that time, with whom I discussed at length, as I had done on numerous occasions prior to that, the future work of CDS-CMA and ADC, and his advice on the founding of CDS-CPA and ADC, which I presented on preparatory meetings to my colleagues, were very useful for my co-workers and myself when founding the Society and the journal; d) For everything stated above, I extend a special thank you to Prof. Mario Gligora, PhD Of course, certain pleasant events come at the very end, in order that we remember them for as long as possible. I wish here to extend special gratitude for the founding of CDS-CMA to Prof. Vladimir Čajkovac, PhD, the president of the former Dermatovenerological Section of ACP, who, after the renaming of ACP to CPA, which created the conditions for the founding of CDS-CMA and the journal ADC, always helped us with useful advice and eagerly supported each of our abovementioned initiatives. All collaboration with Prof. Čajkovac was very pleasant and useful. We repaid his favor by nominating him and electing him to the position of the first president of CDS-CMA and the first chief editor of ADC. To conclude, this article gives an overview of the important data on the founding of CDS-CMA (later CDVS-CMA) as well as the important information on ADC (until Vol 4, No 2). On my behalf and on the behalf of all my co-workers, I extend my congratulations for their achievements to everyone who continued working in CDS-CPA (later CDVS-CMA) and the journal ADC (after Vol 4, No 2), which is nowadays indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), Index Medicus/Medline, Embase/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts Service, Biomedicina Croatica (see ADC Vol 21, No 3, 2013). I hope the current president of the CDVS-CMA, Prof. Mirna Šitum, PhD, as well as the current chief editor of ADC, Prof. Branka Marinović, PhD, who is also the general secretary of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venerology, will enjoy many new achievements in our CDVS-CMA and the journal ADC. It is unnecessary to emphasize the importance of the fact that we have such a respectable journal in our Homeland. NOTE: The honorable duty of preparing this text was entrusted to me by the president of the CDVS-CMA, Prof. Mirna Šitum, PhD, at the meeting of the Executive Board of CDVS-CMA held on the 16th of April 2012 (for the purposes of an oral presentation of this data at the 3rd Croatian Congress of Psychodermatology with international participation, Split, 4-7 October, 2012, and again at the meeting of the Executive Board of CDVS-CMA, held on the 7th of June 2013 for the purposes of the web page of CDVS-CMA).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
[125 years' of the Serbian Medical Society]
V Sulović,B Pavlović
Abstract:In the second half of the last century and under the influence of the European civilization, Serbia abandoned the conservative and patriarchal way of life and began to introduce a new, contemporary political, cultural and social spirit into the country. The development of these civilizing features was under the influence of young intelectuals who, as former scholarship holders of the Serbian government, were educated in many European countries. Among them, there was a group of physicians who returned to the country after having completed their education. They were carriers and holders of the contemporary medical science in Serbia and the neighbouring areas. On April 22, 1872 a group of 15 physicians founded the Serbian Medical Society with the intention to offer an organized medical help and care to the population. The first president was Dr. Aćim Medović and the first secretary Dr. Vladan Dordević. At the meeting held on May 15, 1872 the text of the Statute of the Society was accepted and immediately submitted for approval to the Ministry of Internal Affairs. In the letter addressed to the minister of internal affairs the following reasons were cited: "... The Belgrade physicians feeling a need for having the main office for their professional and scientific meetings, for which they will find the opportunity and the funds, and in spite of their hard medical labor which requires almost all their time, decided to establish the Serbian Medical Society because they wish to be in trend and follow-up the medical progress and exchange the latest medical information not only among them but also with other graduated doctors living in areas with the Serblan population as well as with all scientists who are willing to contribute to the development of medical science in Serbia...". In the first year of its existence the Serbian Medical Society had 9 regular members, 1 honorary member and 34 corresponding members from Serbia, Slavic and other foreign countries. On August 5, 1872 it was decided to start the publication of a professional journal "Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo" (Serbian Archives of General Medicine). The journal has still been edited. On suggestion of the Serbian Medical Society the Law of Health Care was promulgated in 1881. It was translated into German and French languages and sent to about 400 addresses in different European countries with the request for their opinion and suggestion. The reply of the Vienna Medical Society was as follows: "... While the Austrians carry out some stupid regulations of health care, at the same time a small Balkan country, Serbia promulgated a Law according to which no one, including the King, the Government or a political party dare not use a cent intended for health service, treatment of the sick people and payment of physicians...". On the occasion of the centenary of the First Serbian insurrection and coronation ceremonies of the King Petar I Karadjordjević, and under the King's patronage, the First Congress of Serbian physicians and naturalists was organized from 5 to 7 September 1904. There were 433 participants of whom more than 100 foreign participants. A Serbian professor of infectious diseases at the University School of Medicine in Vienna, Dr. Jovan Cokor, presented a paper with results of his studies of tuberculosis according to which tuberculosis could be transmitted from a sick cow to man; in this way he complemented the results and explanations of Dr. Robert Koch who discovered Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In 1907 the Serbian Medical Society organized in Belgrade the First meeting of Yugoslav surgeons. At that time, the foundation of a University school of medicine was planned. The Serbian Red Cross Organization was initiated by the Serbian Medical Society in 1876. On February 2, 1891 a procedure was brought for the establishment of the Medical Chamber. Its activity began in 1901. During the First and Second world wars the activity of the Serbian Medical Society was di
-
FUTURE OF DERMATOVENEREOLOGICAL JOURNALS1
Branka Marinović
Abstract:Each year, during the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, there is a meeting of the Council of Dermatology Editors organized by Professor Larry Parish from Philadelphia. It is so nice to meet old friends there and make some new ones, but above all it is a very good platform to discuss the problems journals and their editors are facing today. Some of the topics we discussed during this year's meeting were the increasing number of case reports submitted to all dermatological journals, problems of plagiarism, the rising number of online journals, and the predatory policies quite often connected with them. There was also discussion on print vs online publication versions and on open access journals. It is always useful to discuss common problems, to realize that all journals have similar problems, and to exchange experiences in solving these problems. One of the problems all journals are facing is the increasing number of case reports being submitted, and their high rejection rate due to different reasons. Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica is overloaded with case reports from many different countries around the world. Most of them are interesting, well prepared cases and could be a good way of exchanging experience between dermatologists. From my personal point of view, case reports are a very useful form of medical communication. For many years they were usually the first articles written by residents under the supervision of their mentors, and I think that all of us should insist on that in the future as well. But the problem is that it has become very difficult to find a journal willing to publish many case reports. Authors are trying to find a journal to publish their case reports in, sometimes sending them to many journals. Unfortunately, the rate of rejection of case reports is rising. And why? There are a few reasons for that, but probably one of the most important is that a high number of published case reports per issue of any journal decreases the impact factor of journal. And for each editor and editorial board, impact factor is one of the main criterions used every year to measure the quality of the journal and their efforts to improve it. Impact factor is also an important criterion when applying for academic positions. This has resulted in some high-impact journals starting to publish separate editions of their journals with case reports only, but also with no or with very low impact factor. This is probably one of the reasons why we receive offers to publish all types of articles in different online open access journals on a daily basis. But of course, if you pay for it… Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica is proud to be the official journal of the Croatian Dermatovenereological Society of the Croatian Medical Association and also be supported by the Croatian Ministry of Science. This gives us the freedom to make balanced content with some case reports per issue, all for free. But we of course also have to take care and try to increase our impact factor, so we try to encourage authors to publish their interesting case reports in the form of letters to the editor, which do not influence the impact factor so strongly but give us the opportunity to communicate our experiences. During this year we hope to make some improvements in the quality and visibility of our Journal, and to start the 25th anniversary of the journal with new impetus.
-
The Canadian Atherosclerosis Society--history and present status
M D Haust
Abstract:Since its inception in 1983 the Canadian Atherosclerosis Society (CAS) has established itself firmly on the national and international scene as a forceful scientific voice. Its presence and activities have had their dominant expression at annual meetings held jointly with the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) and the Canadian Society for Clinical Investigation (CSCI) and in sponsoring other scientific and educational events, the most important of which was the Canadian Consensus Conference on Cholesterol (Ottawa, March 1988). It provided a forum for interaction between the scientific community, government, funding agencies, industry and the general public, and culminated in concrete recommendations for the populace of Canada. It also 'induced' a continuum in governmental and public concern for health with respect to atherosclerosis, and beyond it, the field of cardiovascular diseases. This dialogue continues. As a member (Constituent Society) of the International Atherosclerosis Society (IAS), the CAS has a voice in the international community, its policies and activities. The membership increase from 69 in 1983 to 175 in 1991 reflects steady growth of the CAS. The Society has been active in other areas (publications, awards for young investigators, and common educational endeavours with other groups) and will be host to the 1994 International Symposium on Atherosclerosis. Over a short period of only eight years, all of the above attests to sufficient progress (or achievement) for any scientific society. And yet, there remain quite a few areas not addressed as yet and some sad experiences (eg, that with the Long Term Planning Committee) that must be quickly remedied, if the Society is to keep pace with the everchanging emphasis in research that in the final analysis aims at improving the overall well-being and health of all Canadians. Inherent in the definition of history is the premise that accounts be provided of facts only. Historians who research their subjects derive these facts from studying the necessary accounts relating to these 'facts', using different and preferably controversial resources, so as to present the facts as objectively as possible. It is impossible, however, to fulfill all the above criteria for a historian who lived through every phase of 'life' of the subject of his or her account, because no matter how objective one wishes to remain (and bends backwards to achieve this) there will be always an element of a personal prism through which the historian lived the 'life' with his subject. For being human and thus unable to eliminate entirely that personal component, this writer asks humbly for the reader's understanding.
-
H12 A history of evidence-based medicine and dermatology as an early adopter
Hannah Binns
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae090.360
IF: 11.113
2024-06-28
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Abstract In 1992, a search for evidence-based medicine (EBM) would have only yielded two articles. Now, searching this term in PubMed generates over 276 000 results. But how did the ‘era of evidence-based medicine’ begin and what were its foundations? The concept of using evidence to guide medical practice is thought to date back to Ancient Greece. However, it was not until the 20th century that it started to take hold in modern medicine. Social principles calling for effective healthcare for the masses were a driving force, with British clinical epidemiologist Archie Cochrane (1909–1988) being the first advocate of this practice. Predating Archie Cochrane’s work, the early 20th century’s advancement in statistics and development of the meta-analysis would form the building blocks for modern-day EBM. British statistician Karl Pearson was the first to propose the concept of combining results of individual studies to minimize random error. Later in the 1920s fellow Briton, Ronald Fisher laid the foundation for the systematic approach by developing the statistical method of meta-analysis, first called ‘Fisher’s combined probability test’. In 1976 American statistician Gene Glass coined the term ‘meta-analysis’. By 1989 meta-analysis was changing clinical practice. Sir Ian Chalmers demonstrated that a short course of corticosteroids could drastically reduce complications following delivery of preterm infants. His work, and that of others, highlighted that lives could be saved through the evidence-based approach of performing up-to-date systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials. Meanwhile, in Canada the EBM movement was starting. In 1981 a group led by David Sackett published the first of a series of articles on how to appraise medical literature, influencing the practice of a whole generation. The actual term EBM was announced by Sackett’s mentee Gordon Guyatt in 1992. The levels of evidence that we use today can be attributed to Sackett and his book Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM, which gave clinicians the tools to adopt EBM into everyday practice. Dermatology was an early adopter of EBM. The Cochrane Skin Group (CSG) was founded by Hywel Williams in 1997, with the clear aim of disseminating evidence-based guidelines to prevent, diagnose and treat dermatological disease. The first CSG review was published in 1999, and to date there are 130 active systematic review titles. The work of the CSG elicits tangible effects on international health policy, contributing to national and international guidelines. The work of the CSG is bolstered by the UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network at the Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, a group that aims to explore research gaps identified by the CSG reviews.
dermatology
-
On the development of Croatian neurology
B Barac
Abstract:The author depicts the roots and the development of modern Croatian neurology. On the ground of cultural and civilizational predispositions it achieved an exceptional development during the last three decades in the period after the World War II. Although clinical neurology may be traced only after the foundation of the first Croatian medical faculty in Zagreb in 1917, until 1971 within the common discipline of neuropsychiatry, a vast medical literature: reports on neurological problems both from literature and from everyday medical praxis were published in Croatian after the foundation of the Croatian medical journal "Lijecnicki vjesnik" in 1877, written by internists or general practitioners interested in neurology. First Croatian textbook in neurology was published by Ivo Glavan already in 1935 and new editions of this book have made it a popular handbook for many generations of medical students and physicians, not only in Croatia but also in other parts of the former Yugoslavia. In the sixties the concept of development of subspecialized disciplines prevailed: clinical neurophysiology, epileptology, neuromuscular diseases, cerebrovascular diseases and intensive neurology, child neurology. At that time a fast growing of man-power and institutions started, what made possible a modern concept of early neurologic diagnostics and treatment. The period was marked by intensive collaboration with teams of electrical engineers interested in bio-electronics, development of basic neurosciences, of neuroimaging technologies and neuroscintigraphy. Many initiatives came from Croatia for collaboration with neighbouring countries within the former Yugoslavia, but also with other neighbouring European countries, especially Austria, Italy and Germany, as well as with the American neurology.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
[Hippocratic Oath: professional or ethic code?]
Milos Popović
Abstract:In order to study the historical relationship of early medical professional codex and contemporary demands and challenges, which are currently being placed before physicians, the first such text, known as Hippocratic Oath has been re-translated. According to the source, it is clear that this is a Code of professional conduct, primarily for the welfare of patients, and in order to maintain and preserve medical authority. All parts of the Oath have been discussed and presented, as well as the historical data from which one can see how the system in ancient Greece and Rome worked. The study includes historical data from that time on two controversial issues: the liability of medical awards, and addressing medical services. These are mistakenly considered to belong to the text of the Oath. Examples of the amount of medical awards are stated, as well as the examples of selflessness and dedication of the physicians in that time. A physician was obliged to help by law, only in the case of accidents and injuries. It is obvious that "medical doctrine" existed also in this time. Requirements set to a doctor were realistic, modest and appropriate to the call, with the main purpose of protecting the reputation and dignity of the profession. Despite the historical distance, classical text of the Oath is still up to date. In this context, ambiguities and errors result from not being familiar with the both, the basic text, and the circumstances prevailing at the time and society, in which the Oath was made.
-
Imagepflege mit "linientreuen" Ausländern (Ehrenmitgliedschaften Teil 4)
Wolfgang Frobenius
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2208-1622
2024-02-10
Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde
Abstract:Als sich die seinerzeitige Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie (DGG) im Oktober 1933 in Berlin zu ihrem ersten Kongress im Nationalsozialismus traf, hatte sich der damalige Vorsitzende Walter Stoeckel[1] bestens mit den neuen Machthabern arrangiert und die "Gleichschaltung" der Gesellschaft faktisch schon vollzogen. Wunschgemäß grenzte er in seiner von völkischer Diktion geprägten Eröffnungsrede die jüdischen Mitglieder aus, die er als "beklagenswerte Opfer" einer zur Gesundung des deutschen Volkes notwendigen Härte bezeichnete. Zusätzlich hatte Stoeckel ganz im Sinne der Machthaber eine Sitzung zu den Zwangssterilisationen nach dem im Juli des Jahres verabschiedeten Gesetz zur Verhütung erbkranken Nachwuchses (GzVeN) ins Programm aufgenommen. Sie sollte ebenso wie eine thematisch analoge Veranstaltung beim Folgekongress 1935 der wissenschaftlichen Legitimierung dieser Maßnahmen dienen. Name Lebensdaten letzte Position Besonderheiten (DGG) 1933 Präsident Walter Stoeckel (1871–1961), Ordinarius in Berlin (I. UFK) Otto von Franqué 1867–1937 Ordinarius in Bonn 1925–1927 Präsident; langjähriger Kassenwart Heinrich Füth 1868–1951 Ordinarius in Köln 1923–1925 Vorstandsmitglied 1935 Präsident August Mayer (1876–1968), Ordinarius in Tübingen Gustav Elis Essen-Möller 1870–1956 Ordinarius an der Universität Lund (Schweden) Mitglied seit 1905, 1923–1925 Vorstandsmitglied Heinz Kupferberg 1862–1946 Direktor der Hessischen Hebammenlehranstalt Mainz 1929–1931 Vorstandsmitglied 1937 Präsident Georg August Wagner (1873–1947), Ordinarius in Berlin (Charité) Emilio Alfieri 1874–1949 Ordinarius in Mailand George Comyns Berkeley 1865–1947 Senior Gynaecological Surgeon am Middlesex Hospital London Hermann J. Boldt 1856–1943 Professor für Gynäkologie an der New York Medical School Mitglied seit 1909 Ernst Gaifami 1883–1944 Ordinarius in Rom 1941 Präsident Hans Fuchs (1873–1942), Direktor der Gaufrauenklinik Posen (heute Poznań) Ludwig Seitz 1872–1961 Ordinarius in Frankfurt am Main 1929–1931 Präsident Walter Stoeckel 1871–1961 Ordinarius in Berlin (I. UFK) 1931–1933 Präsident Georg August Wagner 1873–1947 Ordinarius in Berlin (Charité) 1935–1937 Präsident Paul Diepgen 1878–1966 Ordinarius für Medizingeschichte in Mainz 1944 (außerhalb der Kongressroutine) Präsident Rudolf Jaschke (1881–1963), Ordinarius in Gießen Victor Cónill Montobbio 1886–1970 Ordinarius in Barcelona Mitglied seit 1911, 1941–1949 im Vorstand Diese Politisierung der DGG wurde von den meisten Mitgliedern, wenn nicht zustimmend, so doch weitgehend schweigend zur Kenntnis genommen. Zumindest ein Teil der Ausländer unter ihnen äußerte aber auch Unbehagen. Zwei Schweizer kehrten der DGG deshalb explizit "aus Protest gegen unsere Gleichschaltung" bzw. mit Hinweis auf die eigene "weltanschauliche Haltung" den Rücken. Damit teilte sich dem Vorstand unmissverständlich mit, dass hier für das Ansehen der Gesellschaft und die gewünschte Internationalität Gefahren lauerten. August Mayer, der als Präsident den Kongress von 1935 ausrichtete, sprach deshalb entsprechende Warnungen aus und hatte bei seinen Kongressvorbereitungen stets mögliche negative Auswirkungen der Programmgestaltung auf "das Ausland" im Auge. Außerdem wurde in der Folge u. a. der erweiterte Vorstand auf bis zu 11 Mitglieder vergrößert, um "das Ausland auch genügend berücksichtigen zu können." Kriterien für die Berufung in das Gremium waren "politische Zuverlässigkeit" und Übereinstimmung in Leitfragen der Erbgesundheitspolitik [1]. Article published online: 08 February 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
obstetrics & gynecology
-
Policies and practices in the field of laboratory hematology in Croatia – a current overview and call for improvement
Vanja Radišić Biljak,Ivana Lapić,Valentina Vidranski,Ivona Herceg,Franciska Tomić,Brankica Šimac,Martina Horvat,Helena Čičak,Dora Vuljanić,Adrijana Dorotić,Ana Nikler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-1027
2021-12-01
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Abstract:Abstract Objectives In 2019 The Croatian Working Group for Laboratory Hematology, on behalf of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine, wanted to explore the background in field of laboratory hematology routine practice among Croatian laboratories in order to develop future strategies for producing national recommendations, if needed. Methods During April and May 2019, a comprehensive survey covering all main parts of the total testing process within the field of laboratory hematology among Croatian medical laboratories was conducted. The survey comprised 49 inquiries. Data was collected using Survey Monkey (Palo Alto, CA, USA). All collected data was anonymized. Results The response rate was 72%. There is still a substantial number of laboratories that have only three-part differential hematology analyzers (9%). Furthermore, a very high number of laboratories did not perform analyzer verification prior to implementation into routine work (31%). Out of those who have verified their analyzers, a diversity of guidelines and recommendations were used. Nearly 10% of the laboratories do not have a defined policy regarding specimen rejection. The majority of the participants perform internal quality control daily (83%), however, only 51% of respondents evaluate the agreement between different hematology analyzers on daily basis. Although more than 90% of Croatian laboratories have a defined policy regarding specimen rejection, only 61% of respondents continuously monitor quality indicators in routine practice. Conclusions The survey revealed substantial differences in all aspects of laboratory hematology practices among Croatian medical laboratories, indicating the need for universal recommendations at the national level.
-
AMA and SDSMA Membership After Graduation
Sydney Payne,Keith Hansen,Susan Puumala
Abstract:Introduction: One way to foster collaboration and continuing education is medical students' participation in medical associations. However, it isn't clear if being a student member leads to continued membership. In this study, the primary goal is to determine if student membership increases membership in the South Dakota State Medical Association (SDSMA) and American Medical Association (AMA) after graduation. Methods: After validation with 10 physicians through a pilot study, the finalized survey was emailed by the South Dakota Board of Medical and Osteopathic Examiners to every South Dakota licensed physician. The survey included questions about membership in AMA, SDSMA, and other medical organizations. Descriptive data was assessed using counts and percentages. Comparisons were made based on Chi-square tests. Results: In total, 438 individuals consented and participated. Overall, 296 (67.6%) indicated membership in a medical association in medical school; 101 only AMA, 38 only SDSMA, 133 both, and 24 only other. For the 234 with a student AMA membership, 71 (30.3%) continued. Of the 171 with a student SDSMA membership, 88 (51.5%) continued. Comparing those with and without a student AMA membership, 22.6% without joined after graduation and 30.3% with continued (p = 0.07). For SDSMA memberships, 28.5% without joined after graduation, while 51.5% of those with continued. Common reasons for maintaining included professional advocacy (n = 44) and educational opportunities (n = 32), for AMA and professional advocacy (n = 58) and networking (n = 45), for SDSMA. Common reasons for non-continuation in both AMA and SDSMA, were lack of specialty representation and political disagreement. Conclusions: Those who were members of SDSMA as students were more likely to maintain their membership. This difference was less pronounced for AMA. Networking was a common reason for maintaining SDSMA. Focusing on this aspect may be beneficial for retaining members.
-
European Federation for Medical Informatics - the Most Influential Promoter of Medical Informatics Development for the Past 45 Years
Izet Masic
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2021.29.80-93
Abstract:Medical informatics, as much as it is a result of evolution as planned philosophy, have its roots in the history of information technology and medicine. Development of medical informatics started in the fifties of the 20th century. In the period after Second World War USA was the leading country in the field of Computer science and the leader in using the first computers in medicine and healthcare services. The development of information and communication technologies (ICT) during the last two decades of 20th century was particularly important for development of medical informatics, with great influence of Internet by medical professionals at every level of health care system. Comprehensive and essential contents on medical informatics, but also the aspects nurtured by the main "schools of Medical informatics" - Anglo-Saxon (Abbot, Anderson, etc.), French (Gremy, Remond, etc.), German (Reichhertz). et al.), American (Collen, Green, et al.), Middle and East Europe (Dezelic, Masic, Zvarova, Naszlady, Mihalas, etc.), whose terms "Health Informatics" (Abbot) and "Medical Informatics" (Gremy and Reichertz) have entered the European and world medical literature. For those studying the subject or working in the field, the experiences of others who use Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) for the better of health care can provide a necessary perspective. In promotion and spreading the knowledge and experiences of the medical informatics as scientific and academic discipline in the world, great impact was given by IMIA and its "branch associations" at every continent. But, most influential association became European Federation for Medical Informatics (EFMI), established on September 11th 1976 in Copenhagen with members of 10 national representatives (Barry Barber (UK), Antonio Perens de Talens (Italy), Francois Grémy (France), Rolf Hansen (Norway), Mogens Jorgensen (Denmark), Hans Peterson (Sweden), Peter Leo Reichertz (Germany), Jan Roukens (Netherlands), Jan van Egmond (Belgium) and Ilkka Vaananen (Finland) who adopted Statute of EFMI and other documents and prepared the first MIE Conference in Cambridge (UK) in 1978. Today EFMI represent leading European medical informatics professional organization representing 28 European countries and institutional members. EFMI is organized as a non-profit organization concerned with the theory and practice of Information Science and Technology within the Health and Health Sciences sector, in a European context. The goals set of EFMI are: a) To advance international co-operation and dissemination of information in Medical Informatics on a European basis; b) To promote high standards in the application of medical informatics; c) To promote research and development in medical informatics; d) To encourage high standards in education in medical informatics; and e) To function as the autonomous European Regional Council of IMIA. Author of this article described the facts about important events which EFMI, with contribution of national societies, members of EFMI, organized during 45 years of existence, including important facts about the influential medical informatics experts. Finally, author shortly described important facts about history of development of Health informatics in Bosnia and Herzegovina and South-Eastern Europe, including facts about his activities during long period of his participation in IMIA General Assembly and EFMI Council. There he was very actively involved in a lot of activities, including organization of 22nd MIE Conference in Sarajevo in 2009.
-
25th anniversary of the Department of Cardiac Surgery at the University Medical Center Maribor: advancing hearts, changing lives
Miha Antonic,Anze Djordjevic
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-024-02323-7
2024-01-30
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift
Abstract:In 1996, Slovenia witnessed a profound transformation in its cardiac care landscape with the establishment of the Department of Cardiac Surgery at the University Medical Centre Maribor. This momentous milestone heralded the birth of the nation's second heart surgery center revolutionizing cardiovascular care accessibility. Today, the Department of Cardiac Surgery stands as a regional hub, delivering specialized cardiac surgical services to Slovenia's northeastern region and beyond. Its unwavering commitment to excellence, patient-centered care, and adherence to international guidelines reflects its dedication to providing top-tier cardiac care. As the department commemorates its 25th anniversary, this article offers a reflective overview of its establishment, development, growth and future trajectory for further development in an ever-changing era of cardiovascular medicine. The article also highlights the department's active involvement in international collaborations, scientific research, medical education, and innovations in minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
medicine, general & internal
-
The establishment of orthopedics in Croatia
Stella Fatović-Ferenčić,Martin Kuhar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-024-02362-0
2024-04-30
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift
Abstract:Božidar Špišić was a pioneer of Croatian orthopedics. In 1908 he founded the first private orthopedic clinic in the entire South Slav region. During the First World War he organized and headed the first orthopedic hospital for the rehabilitation and resocialization of wounded soldiers. In the interwar period, Špišić was tasked with establishing the orthopedic clinic within the auspices of the School of Medicine, University of Zagreb. This effort in shaping and developing orthopedics in Croatia would not have been possible without his participation in a wide network of internationally renowned orthopedists. After graduating from the University of Graz in 1904, Špišić spent the next 4 years specializing in orthopedics with Hans Spitzy, Arnold Wittek, Fritz Lange and, most importantly, Adolf Lorenz. In this paper, we have reconstructed the transfer of knowledge and experiences between these prominent Austrian and German orthopedists and Božidar Špišić. We have paid special attention to the identification of those elements in Špišić's work that can be traced back to his mentor, teacher and lifelong colleague Adolf Lorenz, such as his treatment for congenital hip dislocation. We believe that the analysis of professional networks can shed additional light on the historiography of orthopedics, given that these influences did not manifest solely through the acquisition of specialized clinical knowledge but also through a profound influence on the core tenets of orthopedics as a discipline—its institutional organization and overall conservative approach.
medicine, general & internal
-
Clinical pharmacology: Developmental path, regulations, education, practical management: Generally and in Serbia
Dragana A. Kastratović,Srđan Z. Marković,Janković M. Slobodan,Dragana Kastratović,Srđan Marković,Janković Slobodan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/hpimj2203215k
2022-01-01
Hospital Pharmacology - International Multidisciplinary Journal
Abstract:Introduction: After searching literature, Professor of Pharmacology at Cornell University Harry Gold was the first to use the name Clinical Pharmacology in the late 1930s and early 1940s. Topic: Clinical pharmacology is a medical discipline created in the middle of the 20th century, it implies the most effective application of medicine, and it could be said that it is the culmination of all therapeutic approaches in medicine, or simply in the preservation of human health. It is a field that spontaneously appeared in the medical field and from the first moment has the only perspective in the unity of practice and science. The second half of the last century is the time of the beginning of the recognition of specialization in clinical pharmacology as an independent medical discipline, in Europe - first in Sweden, England, Switzerland, Norway in the fifties of the last century, in America also in the same period. In Serbia and Montenegro, we noted the beginning in 1981. Clinical pharmacology is a hospital medical specialization; specialists in clinical pharmacology are doctors who know the most adequate use of drugs, which achieves an optimal therapeutic effect. The basis of clinical pharmacology is pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The development path of clinical pharmacology spans more than seven decades, and the key moments are the following: concept of bioavailability (Oser et all, 1945), pharmacokinetics (Friedrich Hartmut Dost, 1953), pharmacokinetics / pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) model (De Jongh and Wijnans and Van Gemert and Duyff, 1950), 1960 - 1980 explosion of pharmacokinetic studies and dramatic progress in the field. Pharmacokinetic interactions between drugs become evident and become the subject of many studies: in the 1970s, drug-level monitoring for digoxin, aminoglycosides, phenytoin, theophylline and other drugs began to be implemented in many hospitals. The 1980 - 2000 period is characterized by the advancement of technology, including liquid chromatography, liquid chromatography with a mass detector, and the development of computer technology. What makes clinical pharmacology attractive is the concept of the connection between drug concentration and pharmacodynamic effect, which unites science and practice in achieving a therapeutic effect and more successful medical treatment patients, appeared in the eighties of the last century. In the mid-1980s, Yusko and Boudinot began research linking biochemical mechanisms with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic techniques and leading to their refinement. Conclusion: The development of pharmacology as a profession and science related to the use of drugs spontaneously moved from experimental pharmacology to clinical pharmacology to hospital pharmacology. In order for a clinical pharmacology specialist to really show and prove the useful value of this knowledge, the cooperation of all doctors in teamwork is necessary, as well as cooperation with scientists and cooperation with pharmaceutical magnates. If they find a way for a positive dialogue, the results will become a daily practice. Underline the letter to editors of journals, and alert letters via professional community, meaning be supported and informed. The main developmental goal of hospital pharmacology is to encompass a wide vaiety of specialists and subspecialists, together with strict demands in respecting pharmacoterapy choice, clinical trials law, monitoring side effects of drugs and medical devices. Ffrom authors's experience clinical pharmacologists' duties are clear, however, clinical pharmacology specialists and subspecialists are insufficient. Educating more colleagues is necessery for the future in order to increase presence of clinical pharmacology
-
50 Years of the Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts 1967-2017 and 48 Years of Publishing the Journal Prilozi (Contributions) of MASA
Momir Polenakovic,Nada Pop-Jordanova,Zoran Gucev
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/prilozi-2018-0001
2017-12-01
PRILOZI
Abstract:Abstract Papers on medical subjects have been published since the first issue of the journal Prilozi in 1969, totalling a number of of 957 (nine hundred and fifty seven) papers have been published in Prilozi. Two hundred and twenty nine cover subjects on natural sciences and mathematics, and 728 (seven hundred and twenty eight) subjects on medical sciences. So far, 2017 No. XXXVIII-2, 622 (six hundred and twenty two) papers published in Prilozi are in Pubmed. Prilozi is published three times a year and it is covered by the following services: Baidu Scholar, Case, Celdes, CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), CNPIEC, DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals), EBSCO (relevant databases), EBSCO Discovery Service, Elsevier – SCOPUS, Google Scholar, J-Gate, JournalTOCs, KESLI-NDSL (Korean National Discovery for Science Leaders), Naviga (Softweco), Primo Central (ExLibris), Publons, PubMed, ReadCube, ResearchGate, SCImago (SJR), Summon (Serials Solutions/ProQuest), TDNet, Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb WanFang Data, WorldCat (OCLC).
English Else
-
The European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics-25 years' young and going strong
Jamie J Coleman,Caroline Samer,Markus Zeitlinger,Michiel van Agtmael,Gerard A Rongen,Pierre Marquet,Tabassome Simon,Donald Singer,Vangelis G Manolopoulos,Ylva Böttiger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-019-02690-5
Abstract:Clinical pharmacology as a scientific discipline and medical specialty was unarguably born in the twentieth century. Whilst pharmacology-the science behind the treatment of disease-had been in evolution since at least medieval times, the clinical discipline of pharmacology has had a more recent genesis and rather insidious evolution. During the 1900s, there were some clear father (parent) figures of clinical pharmacology in Europe that emerged and were responsible for the development of the specialty in this continent. This was a time when there were parallel developments in geographically dispersed academic departments (around the globe), during an age of excitement in drug discovery and clinical application of new therapeutic agents. It was the meeting of minds of some of these progenitors of the specialty that led to the development of the European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (EACPT) 25 years ago arising from a working party supported by the World Health Organization in Europe. The EACPT now includes all major national organizations for clinical pharmacology in Europe, representing over 4000 individual professionals interested in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. The EACPT has a major interest in promoting the safe use of medicines across Europe and internationally and has supported these aims since 1995, through biennial international scientific congresses and summer schools with delegates and presenters from around the world as well as various working group activities. In this article, the current executive committee members of EACPT recall this history, describe the evolution of the association over the last quarter of a century, and provide an update on the activities and ambitions of the association today.
-
[HEALTH CARE IN SLAVONIAN PROVINCE DURING THE 19th CENTURY]
Slavko Čandrlić,Danijel Šabanović,Karlo Mahaček,Dubravka Holik,Maja Miškulin,Miodrag Beneš,Ivan Miškulin,Ivan Včev,Davor Lešić,Marija Čandrlić
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31952/amha.21.2.7
2024-01-02
Abstract:Due to its proximity to the Ottoman Empire, Slavonia was constantly exposed to the threat of invasion by numerous infectious and non-infectious diseases. An additional aggravating circumstance was the poor living and hygienic conditions in Slavonia, poverty, droughts, and floods. After the withdrawal of the Ottomans at the end of the 17th century, medical care was provided only by a few barbers and ‘ranarniks’ (i.e., feldshers) who remained in the Slavonian province. Due to the poor medical care, in 1770, the Empress and Queen Maria Theresa issued the General Health Law, which applied to the entire Habsburg Monarchy, including Slavonia. Among other things, it provided for the introduction of formal training for health personnel, ultimately leading to a better quality medical workforce. At the same time, charlatans were increasingly prohibited from working. The shortage of trained physicians, dentists, midwives, pharmacists, and veterinarians was addressed through various measures to promote their education and training. After obtaining their diplomas, these professionals were employed in hospitals, old people’s homes, nursing homes, homes for people with disabilities, and other healthcare institutions where the inhabitants of the Slavonian province received medical care.
-
Sixty years since the foundation of the Medical Faculty at the Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, R. Macedonia (1947-2007)
Magdalena Zanteva-Naumoska,Momir Polenakovic
PRILOZI
Abstract:The Medical Faculty (M.F.) in Skopje was founded on 6th March 1947 by a Decree of the Government of the Republic of Macedonia. Over the past six decades, the Medical Faculty has been and still is a key institution where medical professionals, medical doctors and other medical-health personnel have been educated, as well as an institution where scientific research and applied health activities have been conducted. The first 153 students were enrolled at the Faculty in the autumn of 1947. More than 10000 medical doctors and 350 radiology technicians have graduated at the Medical Faculty. A total of 315 students have finished postgraduate studies and acquired a Master's degree in medical sciences and there are 160 active postgraduates at present. The degree of Doctor of Medical Sciences has been awarded to 463 candidates, while 93 are in the process of preparing their doctoral thesis. Currently the process of introducing three-year doctoral studies is underway. Since 1992, 2,380 have successsfully passed the specialist exam, while 700 specializations are ongoing. The teaching process is being conducted by 233 professors and 215 teaching assistants through 33 departments. The Medical Faculty consists of 12 institutes and 3 teaching bases in the pre-clinical segment. The clinical segment consists of 25 clinics, 3 institutes and 7 teaching bases. The Medical Faculty has published the journal Godishen zbornik na Medicinskiot fakultet, which has been renamed Makedonsko spisanie za medicina. More than 380 monographs and textbooks have been printed in the country or abroad. A total number of 350 scientific projects have been undertaken, 40 with international partners. The Medical Faculty in Skopje has been a founder and "mother" faculty to the Faculty of Dentistry and the Faculty of Pharmacy, also providing, at the same time, interdisciplinary studies at other faculties.
-
Editorial Policies and Good Practices in Editing the Journal ‘International Medical Journal - Medicus’
Aziz Pollozhani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/prilozi-2015-0012
2014-12-01
PRILOZI
Abstract:Abstract Ten years ago the Association of Albanian Physicians in Macedonia undertook the very brave step of publishing a scientific medical journal, Medicus, as a platform for publishing biomedical research papers. Medical journal MEDICUS is an international peer-review journal of biomedical science. The first issue was published in 2004, starting with publishing two issues per year. From 2013, the journal delivered three issues per year, namely in January, May and September. Editor-in-Chief of the journal is Prof. Dr. Aziz Pollozhani. This year marks the tenth anniversary since publication of the first issue of Medicus, a fact that makes us proud and happy. The journal has its own official website (www.imjm.mk), where papers can be submitted and published in electronic form. In addition, the journal also comes out in print form to be distributed mainly in the region. Taking into account the specific socio-cultural characteristics of the region, the journal attempts to promote research activities in the region, while seeking to serve as an educational tool to promote scientific work in such a setting. As a result, Medicus accepts manuscripts for publication in English, Albanian and Macedonian, with a mandatory abstract in English for all papers. The journal Medicus represents a solid platform of biomedical sciences that will serve to advance scientific research and promote professional achievements in medicine.
-
Welcome to the December 2023 Issue (Vol:29, No:4) and Current News of the European Journal of Therapeutics
Ayşe Balat,Şevki Hakan Eren,Mehmet Sait Menzilcioğlu,İlhan Bahşi,İlkay Doğan,Davut Sinan Kaplan,Mehmet Karadağ,Ayşe Aysima Özçelik,Fatih Sarı,Hamit Yıldız
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther1968
2023-12-28
European Journal of Therapeutics
Abstract:Dear Colleagues, In this editorial, we would like to share with you important developments in the European Journal of Therapeutics (Eur J Ther). First of all, as the editorial team, we would like you to know that we hold frequent meetings to benefit our esteemed colleagues and continue to work with great devotion in line with our goal of taking the journal further. We have previously shared with you that we have applied to many indexes. It is with great pleasure that we would like to inform you that in the last few months, more of our index applications have been approved. Index Copernicus, as a result of this application, the ICV 2022 value of our journal was determined to be 100 (approved 2023-10-31) [1] BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine) (approved 2023-11-30) [2] Sherpa Romeo (approved 2023-09-27) [3] MIAR (approved 2023-10-16) [4] All indexes in our journal are currently included on the journal web page [5]. As the editorial team, we would like to inform you that we have determined a policy on this issue for our journal [6], taking into account the recommendations of important international ethics committees such as the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) [7] and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) [8], which have recently become a trendy topic of discussion about AI chatbots and academic studies prepared with the support of such tools. As you know, when our journal was founded in 1990 [9], it was published in two yearly issues. It is an essential responsibility for us to carry our journal, which continued its publication life with three issues a year in 2009 [10] and four issues a year in 2014 [11]. With your valuable support, we would like to announce that we will increase our journal to 6 issues a year as of 2024 (February, April, June, August, October and December) with the rapidly growing progress of our journal. Unfortunately, we cannot share the names of the referees who made significant contributions to our journal in 2023 due to the changes in the article submission interface during the year and the inaccessibility of some data in the previous interface. However, we would like to emphasize again that we are grateful to all of them for their valuable contributions. Moreover, to expand our journal's referee list, we would like to remind you that competent academics who volunteer in this regard can fill out the “Become a Reviewer for the European Journal of Therapeutics” form [12]. Finally, we would like to point out that we have strengthened our editorial team with an academician competent in dentistry, Fatih Sari, DDS, PhD. Fatih Sari, DDS, PhD, is a new Editorial Board Member of the Eur J Ther. Dr. Sari is an Associate Professor in the Department of Prosthodontics at the Gaziantep University Faculty of Dentistry. He is a Vice Dean of the Faculty of Dentistry and Head of Clinical Departments. Dr. Sari is a prosthodontist and a member of the Turkish Dental Association. He has experience in implant-supported fixed prostheses, Cad/Cam applications and dental materials. We look forward to being able to offer you a large number of high-quality and valuable articles over the coming year. In addition, we would like to thank the readers, authors and reviewers of the Eur J Ther for their continuous support. Sincerely yours,
-
[Scientific and research projects of the Department of Family Medicine--contribution to the identity of general practice/family medicine as a scientific discipline]
Milica Katić,Antun Budak,Mladenka Vrcić-Keglević,Sanja Blazeković-Milaković,Biserka Bergman-Marković,Hrvoje Tiljak,Durdica Lazić,Venija Cerovecki-Nekić,Goranka Petricek,Zlata Ozvacić
Abstract:The main task of an academic department of any medical discipline is an integrated development and improvement of professional, scientific and educational activities. The proces of formulation, establishment and recognition of general practice/family medicine as an academic discipline in Croatia started with postgraduate education and vocational training in 1960 at the Andrija Stampar School of Public Health. In 1980 Department of Family Medicine of the Medical School, University of Zagreb was officially established. The aim of this paper was to describe the characteristics of general practice/family medicine as a scientific discipline with its proper, independent knowledge, acquired in scientific research and applied in practice. Based on literature review, specific areas and methodology of scientific research in general practice/family medicine are presented. Scientific research in general practice/family medicine has traditionally included epidemiological, clinical, organisational and other aspects of work of general practitioners/family physicians comprising activities directed towards patient and community care, as well as towards the position and responsibilities within a health care system. Department of Family Medicine carried out its own scientific projects, participated in international scientific projects and scientific projects implemented with other partners. Some of these projects were presented in this paper with the purpose to give a brief insight into the development and current state of the scientific work within the Department of Family Medicine.