Abstract:With the forthcoming release of high precision polarization measurements, such as from the Planck satellite, it becomes critical to evaluate the performance of estimators for the polarization fraction and angle. These two physical quantities suffer from a well-known bias in the presence of measurement noise, as has been described in part I of this series. In this paper, part II of the series, we explore the extent to which various estimators may correct the bias. Traditional frequentist estimators of the polarization fraction are compared with two recent estimators: one inspired by a Bayesian analysis and a second following an asymptotic method. We investigate the sensitivity of these estimators to the asymmetry of the covariance matrix which may vary over large datasets. We present for the first time a comparison among polarization angle estimators, and evaluate the statistical bias on the angle that appears when the covariance matrix exhibits effective ellipticity. We also address the question of the accuracy of the polarization fraction and angle uncertainty estimators. The methods linked to the credible intervals and to the variance estimates are tested against the robust confidence interval method. From this pool of estimators, we build recipes adapted to different use-cases: build a mask, compute large maps, and deal with low S/N data. More generally, we show that the traditional estimators suffer from discontinuous distributions at low S/N, while the asymptotic and Bayesian methods do not. Attention is given to the shape of the output distribution of the estimators, and is compared with a Gaussian. In this regard, the new asymptotic method presents the best performance, while the Bayesian output distribution is shown to be strongly asymmetric with a sharp cut at low S/N.Finally, we present an optimization of the estimator derived from the Bayesian analysis using adapted priors.

Optimal ellipsometric parameter measurement strategies based on four intensity measurements in presence of additive Gaussian and Poisson noise

Optimal Configurations of Mueller Polarimeter for Gaussian–Poisson Mixed Noise

Influence of Noise Statistics on Optimizing the Distribution of Integration Time for Degree of Linear Polarization Polarimetry

Polarization measurements analysis I. Impact of the full covariance matrix on polarization fraction and angle measurements

Polarization measurements analysis II. Best estimators of polarization fraction and angle

Effect of Light Source Uniformity for Imaging Ellipsometry Measurements

Study of the New Ellipsometric Measurement Method Using Integrated Analyzer in Parallel Mode.

Multivariable Optimization Method for Improving the Self-Calibration and Accuracy of a Binary Polarization State Analyzer

Multi-variable Optimization Method for Improving the Self-Calibration and Accuracy of a Binary Polarization State Analyzer

Approach to Error Analysis and Reduction for Rotating-Polarizer-Analyzer Ellipsometer

Full Poincare polarimetry enabled through physical inference

Quantum entanglement enabled ellipsometer for phase retardance measurement

Maximum-likelihood estimation in ptychography in the presence of Poisson-Gaussian noise statistics

A Measurement Angle Error Correction Method for Polarized Images Based on Levenberg-Marquardt

Full-field automated photoelasticity by fourier polarimetry with three wavelengths

Geometric Optimization Method for a Polarization State Generator of a Mueller Matrix Microscope

Optimal Gaussian measurements for phase estimation in single-mode Gaussian metrology

Polarization Mixing Error in Transmission Ellipsometry with Two Acousto-Optical Modulators

High Precision UV-visible-near-IR Stokes Vector Spectroscopy

Estimating Polarization Purity With Noise

Noise modeling and analysis of polarization imaging for scattered skylight