Exploring sex differences in cardiac interoceptive accuracy using the phase adjustment task
Ria Spooner,Jonathan M. Bird,Nerea Irigoras Izagirre,Rhea Clemente,Elisa Fernandez Fueyo,Gemma Budworth,Dorina Cocirla,Jennifer Todd,Jane Aspell,Mateo Leganes,Dawn Watling,David Plans,Rebecca Brewer,Jennifer Murphy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14689
2024-09-27
Psychophysiology
Abstract:Previous evidence suggests males and females differ with respect to interoception—the processing of internal bodily signals—with males typically outperforming females on tasks of interoceptive accuracy. However, interpretation of existing evidence in the cardiac domain is hindered by the limitations of existing tools. In this investigation, we pooled data from several samples to examine sex differences in cardiac interoceptive accuracy on the phase adjustment task, a new measure that overcomes several limitations of the existing tools. In a sample of 266 individuals, we observed that females outperformed males, indicative of better cardiac interoceptive accuracy, but had lower confidence than males. These results held after controlling for sex differences in demographic, physiological and engagement factors. Importantly, these results were specific to the measure of cardiac interoceptive accuracy. No sex differences were observed for individuals who completed the structurally identical screener task, although a similar pattern of results was observed in relation to confidence. These surprising data suggest the presence of a female advantage for cardiac interoceptive accuracy and potential differences in interoceptive awareness (metacognition). Possible reasons for mixed results in the literature, as well as implications for theory and future research, are discussed.
psychology, experimental,physiology,neurosciences, biological