The importance of biochemistry in the medical curriculum.

C. Gray

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Energy Flow during Baseball Machine Hitting

Jessica Downs Talmage,Nicole Bordelon,Kyle Wasserberger,Gretchen D. Oliver

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2350-8567

2024-07-25

International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:The primary aims of the study were to perform a descriptive analysis of hitting energetics off a pitching machine and to compare between the rear- and lead-side lower and upper extremities. Eighty-five high school to minor league baseball athletes participated. Five full-effort swings off a pitching machine with the fastest exit velocity were used for analysis. Energy flow was quantified using a segment power analysis. Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed significant differences between rear- and lead-side energetics during both swing phases. During the stride, the rear knee and shoulder generated more energy than the lead side. Throughout the swing phase the lead knee, hip, and elbow generated more energy than the rear side, but at the shoulder the rear side generated significantly more energy than the lead. Most intriguing, differing energy transfer directions between the rear and lead knee and shoulder joints were reported. Furthermore, descriptive results revealed energy is predominantly transferred across the knee, shoulder, and elbow joints, while the hips primarily display energy generation. The descriptive nature of the study provides a foundation for future research and can be used as a resource for training personnel to design effective training protocols aimed at maximizing performance. Received: 05 March 2024 Accepted: 11 June 2024 Article published online: 24 July 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

sport sciences
Energy flow in men's javelin throw and its relationship to joint load and performance

Hans-Peter Köhler,Maren Witt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16081

IF: 3.061

2023-09-19

PeerJ

Abstract:Background: Performance in javelin throwing is dependent on the release speed and therefore the energy transferred to the javelin. Little is known about the flow of mechanical energy in javelin throwing and whether there is a connection to joint loading and throwing performance. The purpose of the study was therefore to investigate (1) the energy flow within the kinetic chain of the throwing arm, (2) how it is related to performance and joint loads and (3) how joint forces and torques are used to transfer, generate and absorb mechanical energy. Methods: The kinematics of 10 experienced javelin throwers were recorded using a 12-camera infrared system. 16 markers were placed on the athlete's body, five on the javelin to track the movement of each segment. A segmental power analysis was carried out to calculate energy flow between upper body, upper arm, forearm and hand. Stepwise regression analysis was used to calculate the variable that best predicts release speed and joint loads. Results: The results indicate that the higher the peak rate of energy transfer from the thorax to the humerus, the higher the release speed and the joint loads. While there were no differences between the peak rate of energy transfer in the different joints, the energy transferred differed depending on whether joint forces or torques were used. It can be further shown that higher joint torques and thus higher rotational kinetics at the shoulder are linked to higher release speeds. Thus, the movements of the upper body can be of great influence on the result in javelin throwing. Furthermore, the data show that athletes who are able to transfer more energy through the shoulder, rather than generate it, experience a smaller joint loading. An effective technique for improved energy transfer can thus help perform at the same level while lowering joint stress or have higher performance at the same joint loading.
An Analysis of Intrapitch Variation in Joint and Segment Velocities With Throwing Arm Kinetics in High School and Professional Baseball Pitchers

Joseph E. Manzi,Brittany Dowling,Zhaorui Wang,Robert Cecere,Suleiman Y. Sudah,Michael C. Fu,Lawrence V. Gulotta,Joshua S. Dines,James B. Carr

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241247546

IF: 4.8

2024-05-21

The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:Improper sequencing order of maximal joint and segment velocities has been identified as an important predictor for both throwing arm kinetics and ball velocity.Purpose:To investigate the intrapitcher variation of maximal segment velocities and the relationship to throwing arm kinetics and ball velocity in high school (HS) and professional (PRO) pitchers.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:HS (n = 59) and PRO (n = 338) pitchers, instructed to throw 8 to 12 fastball pitches, were evaluated with 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). Maximal joint and segment velocities were calculated for each pitch, and the standard deviation of the maxima was calculated per pitcher. These standard deviations were used to classify pitchers as "low variance" or "high variance" for each segmental velocity subgroup, "overall low variance" or "overall high variance" based on cumulative segment velocity variation, or "population," with any pitcher eligible to be included in multiple subcategories. Maximal velocities and throwing arm kinetics were compared among the various subgroups.Results:The HS low-variance shoulder internal rotation velocity subgroup (4949 ± 642 deg/s) had significantly lower maximal shoulder internal rotation velocity compared with HS population (5774 ± 1057 deg/s) (P < .001); similar findings were observed for PROs (5269 ± 835 vs 5824 ± 1076 deg/s; P < .001), as well as lower shoulder superior force compared with the PRO population (14.8% ± 8.8% vs 17.8% ± 8.8% body weight; P = .001). The PRO low-variance lead knee extension velocity subgroup had significantly lower maximal lead knee extension velocity (216 ± 135 vs 258 ± 125 deg/s; P = .001) and shoulder distractive force (111.5% ± 14.4% vs 115.6% ± 15.9% body weight; P = .003) compared with the PRO population. The PRO overall low-variance subgroup had significantly lower shoulder distractive force (111.8% ± 14.1% vs 119.6% ± 15.5% body weight; P = .008) and elbow anterior force (40.6% ± 5.0% vs 43.6% ± 6.2% body weight; P = .008) compared with the PRO overall high-variance subgroup.Conclusion:HS and PRO pitchers with low variance for joint and segment velocities achieved significantly lower maximal velocities in the subgroup of interest, while preserving ball velocity. PRO pitchers with overall low variance among multiple maximal joint and segment velocities demonstrated decreased shoulder distractive and elbow anterior force.Clinical Relevance:PRO pitchers with low intrapitch variation in maximal joint and segment velocities may be viewed as kinetically conservative throwers. These pitchers with similarly maintained mechanics between pitches may have an increasingly regimented form that preserves kinetic forces about the throwing arm. The opposite may be true for PRO pitchers with increased variability in segmental velocities during their pitching motion, as they showed increased throwing arm kinetics including shoulder distractive and elbow anterior force compared with the overall low-variance group, theoretically increasing their risk of injury.

orthopedics,sport sciences
A Comparison of Throwing Arm Kinetics and Ball Velocity in High School Pitchers With Overall Fast and Overall Slow Cumulative Joint and Segment Velocities

Joseph E. Manzi,Brittany Dowling,Zhaorui Wang,Suleiman Y. Sudah,Brockton A. Dowling,Mark Wishman,Kathryn McElheny,Joseph J. Ruzbarsky,Brandon J. Erickson,Michael C. Ciccotti,Michael G. Ciccotti,Joshua S. Dines

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241271968

IF: 4.8

2024-09-04

The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:Individual maximum joint and segment angular velocities have shown positive associations with throwing arm kinetics and ball velocity in baseball pitchers.Purpose:To observe how cumulative maximum joint and segment angular velocities, irrespective of sequence, affect ball velocity and throwing arm kinetics in high school pitchers.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:High school (n = 55) pitchers threw 8 to 12 fastball pitches while being evaluated with 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). Maximum joint and segment angular velocities (lead knee extension, pelvis rotation, trunk rotation, shoulder internal rotation, and forearm pronation) were calculated for each pitcher. Pitchers were classified as overall fast, overall slow, or high velocity for each joint or segment velocity subcategory, or as population, with any pitcher eligible to be included in multiple subcategories. Kinematic and kinetic parameters were compared among the various subgroups using t tests with post hoc regressions and multivariable regression models created to predict throwing arm kinetics and ball velocity, respectively.Results:The lead knee extension and pelvis rotation velocity subgroups achieved significantly higher normalized elbow varus torque (P = .016) and elbow flexion torque (P = .018) compared with population, with equivalent ball velocity (P = .118). For every 1-SD increase in maximum pelvis rotation velocity (87 deg/s), the normalized elbow distractive force increased by 4.7% body weight (BW) (B = 0.054; β = 0.290; P = .013). The overall fast group was older (mean ± standard deviation, 16.9 ± 1.4 vs 15.4 ± 0.9 years; P = .007), had 8.9-mph faster ball velocity (32.7 ± 3.1 vs 28.7 ± 2.3 m/s; P = .002), and had significantly higher shoulder internal rotation torque (63.1 ± 17.4 vs 43.6 ± 12.0 Nm; P = .005), elbow varus torque (61.8 ± 16.4 vs 41.6 ± 11.4 Nm; P = .002), and elbow flexion torque (46.4 ± 12.0 vs 29.5 ± 6.8 Nm; P < .001) compared with the overall slow group. A multiregression model for ball velocity based on maximum joint and segment angular velocities and anthropometrics predicted 53.0% of variance.Conclusion:High school pitchers with higher maximum joint and segment velocities, irrespective of sequence, demonstrated older age and faster ball velocity at the cost of increased throwing shoulder and elbow kinetics.Clinical Relevance:Pitchers and coaching staff should consider this trade-off between faster ball velocity and increasing throwing arm kinetics, an established risk factor for elbow injury.

orthopedics,sport sciences
The Role of the Lead Hip in Collegiate Baseball Pitching: Implications for Ball Velocity and Upper-Extremity Joint Moments

Matthew J Solomito,Erin J Garibay,Andrew Cohen,Carl W Nissen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2023-0277

2024-08-22

Abstract:Hip flexibility is an important biomechanical factor for a baseball pitcher. However, there have been limited investigations into the association between upper-extremity joint stresses and ball velocity and hip flexibility, as assessed via motion patterns during the pitch. The purpose of this study was to provide a detailed kinematic description of the lead hip during the pitch and determine the association between lead hip motion and both ball velocity and the elbow varus moment. This study was a secondary analysis of the kinematic and kinetic data previously collected on 99 collegiate-level baseball pitchers using standard optoelectronic motion capture. Significant associations were noted between lead hip internal rotation and both peak ball velocity and the elbow varus moment. The data indicated that for every 10° increase in internal lead hip rotation, ball velocity increased by 0.6 m/s (P < .001, r2 = .26), and the elbow varus moment increased by 5 N·m (P < .001, r2 = .33). The results of this study suggested that internal hip rotation may be an important means of identifying pitchers that may be at risk for future injury.
Investigating the Influence of Modifiable Physical Measures on the Elbow Varus Torque – Ball Velocity Relationship in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers

Adam J. Barrack,Motoki Sakurai,Choo Phei Wee,Paul R. Diaz,Carl Stocklin,Andy R. Karduna,Lori A. Michener

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241296496

IF: 2.6

2024-11-28

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 11, November 2024. Background:The mechanism of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury during pitching is excessive elbow varus torque (EVT). The EVT–ball velocity (T-V) relationship allows concurrent assessment of player performance and UCL injury risk. Modifiable physical capacities may underlie individual variation seen in the T-V relationship.Purpose:To identify physical performance characteristics that impact the T-V relationship during pitching.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:A total of 87 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I pitchers participated. Pitching collection involved measurement of EVT and ball velocity during 5 maximal effort fastballs thrown to a catcher. Physical measures collected were the following: shoulder and hip passive range of motion (ROM) and strength, shoulder rate of torque development (RTD), grip strength, and lumbopelvic stability. Physical measures were entered into univariate linear mixed models with ball velocity as a covariate to predict EVT. Variable reduction for multivariate models involved selection of physical measures based on random forest–derived variable importance and univariate relationship significance, rendering a 27-variable pool. Multivariate linear mixed models predicting EVT, adjusting for physical measures and other physical characteristics, were then created using backward elimination.Results:In univariate analysis, for every 1 m/s (2.2 mph) increase in ball velocity, the mean EVT increased by 1.51 Nċm (95% CI, 0.66-2.37 Nċm; P = .001). In univariate analysis, hip abduction strength symmetry and bilateral lumbopelvic stability significantly increased EVT, while dominant-shoulder ROM, scaption RTD symmetry, and hip ROM significantly decreased EVT. Variables that increased EVT while controlling for ball velocity in the final model include grip strength symmetry, lead-leg lumbopelvic stability, and bodyweight. Increased dominant-shoulder internal rotation (IR) strength, dominant-shoulder flexion ROM, and scaption strength asymmetry decreased EVT as ball velocity increased.Conclusion:Several modifiable physical measures affected EVT in the univariate analysis. In our final model, when controlling for ball velocity, EVT increased with increased grip strength symmetry, lead-leg lumbopelvic stability, and bodyweight and decreased with increased dominant-shoulder IR strength, dominant-shoulder flexion ROM, and scaption strength asymmetry.Clinical Relevance:Defining the individual and multivariate effects of these physical capacities on EVT contextualizes their role in the T-V relationship and helps identify access points through which coaches and clinicians can optimize a pitcher's T-V relationship.

orthopedics,sport sciences
Role of Pelvis and Trunk Biomechanics in Generating Ball Velocity in Baseball Pitching

Karl F Orishimo,Ian J Kremenic,Michael J Mullaney,Takumi Fukunaga,Nicholas Serio,Malachy P McHugh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004314

2023-03-01

Abstract:Orishimo, KF, Kremenic, IJ, Mullaney, MJ, Fukunaga, T, Serio, N, and McHugh, MP. Role of pelvis and trunk biomechanics in generating ball velocity in baseball pitching. J Strength Cond Res 37(3): 623-628, 2023-The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of pelvis rotation velocity, trunk rotation velocity, and hip-shoulder separation on ball velocity during baseball pitching. Fastball pitching kinematics were recorded in 29 male pitchers (age 17 ± 2 years, 23 high school, 6 college). Pelvis and trunk angular velocities and hip-shoulder separation were calculated and averaged for the 3 fastest pitches. Associations between peak pelvis velocity, peak trunk velocity, hip-shoulder separation at foot contact, and ball velocity were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple regression. The average ball velocity was 33.5 ± 2.8 m·s -1 . The average hip-shoulder separation at foot contact was 50 ± 12°. The peak pelvis velocity (596 ± 88°·s -1 ) occurred at 12 ± 11% of the time from stride foot contact to ball release, with the peak trunk velocity (959 ± 120°·s -1 ) occurring at 36 ± 11%. Peak trunk velocity was predictive of ball velocity ( p = 0.002), with 25% of the variability in ball velocity explained. No combination of factors further explained ball velocity. Hip-shoulder separation at foot contact (17%, p = 0.027), peak pelvis velocity (23%, p = 0.008), and the timing of peak pelvis velocity (16%, p = 0.031) individually predicted peak trunk velocity. The combination of peak pelvis velocity, hip-shoulder separation at foot contact, and the timing of peak trunk velocity explained 55% of the variability in trunk rotation velocity ( p < 0.001). These data highlight the importance of interactions between pelvis and trunk for maximizing velocity in pitching. Training to improve pelvis-trunk axial dissociation may increase maximal trunk rotation velocity and thereby increase ball velocity without increasing training load on the shoulder and elbow.
Combined Countermovement Jump Testing and Motion Analysis as the Future of Performance Assessment for Baseball Pitchers: A Narrative Review

Motoki Sakurai,David J Szymanski,Mu Qiao,Ryan L Crotin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004261

2023-06-01

Abstract:Sakurai, M, Szymanski, DJ, Qiao, M, and Crotin, RL. Combined countermovement jump testing and motion analysis as the future of performance assessment for baseball pitchers: a narrative review. J Strength Cond Res 37(6): 1327-1338, 2023-Whole-body kinematics and kinetics impact pitching performance, and when coordination of momentum transfer is impacted, throwing-related injury risks increase. Although correlations between overhead throwing velocity and lower-body power measured by jump tests have been reported by previous studies, further research is needed to identify these relationships to better understand pitching mechanics and the validity and application of jump tests for the assessment of baseball pitchers. This review communicates effective whole-body pitching mechanics, including throwing arm, trunk, and pelvis, and lower body, as well as discusses the applicability of strength and power field tests to deepen training insights in establishing more efficient motor patterns. If both lower-body power and coordination of momentum transfer are optimized, baseball pitchers may experience reduced throwing arm stress. The overarching insight to be gained from this review article is that high performance in baseball pitching is multifactorial, and attention to both strength and skill coaching is paramount. As a result, the intersection of lower-body power testing and biomechanical analysis can play an important role in uniting strength and conditioning professionals, clinicians, pitching coaches, and biomechanics experts to advance pitching performance and health in the sport of baseball.
Machine Learning and Statistical Prediction of Pitching Arm Kinetics

Kristen F. Nicholson,Gary S. Collins,Brian R. Waterman,Garrett S. Bullock

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211054506

IF: 4.8

2021-11-15

The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Background: Over the past decade, research has attempted to elucidate the cause of throwing-related injuries in the baseball athlete. However, when considering the entire kinetic chain, full body mechanics, and pitching cycle sequencing, there are hundreds of variables that could influence throwing arm health, and there is a lack of quality investigations evaluating the relationship and influence of multiple variables on arm stress. Purpose: To identify which variables have the most influence on elbow valgus torque and shoulder distraction force using a statistical model and a machine learning approach. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on baseball pitchers who underwent biomechanical evaluation at the university biomechanics laboratory. Regression models and 4 machine learning models were created for both elbow valgus torque and shoulder distraction force. All models utilized the same predictor variables, which included pitch velocity and 17 pitching mechanics. Results: The analysis included a total of 168 high school and collegiate pitchers with a mean age of 16.7 years (SD, 3.2 years) and BMI of 24.4 (SD, 1.2). For both elbow valgus torque and shoulder distraction force, the gradient boosting machine models demonstrated the smallest root mean square errors and the most precise calibrations compared with all other models. The gradient boosting model for elbow valgus torque reported the highest influence for pitch velocity (relative influence, 28.4), with 5 mechanical variables also having significant influence. The gradient boosting model for shoulder distraction force reported the highest influence for pitch velocity (relative influence, 20.4), with 6 mechanical variables also having significant influence. Conclusion: The gradient boosting machine learning model demonstrated the best overall predictive performance for both elbow valgus torque and shoulder distraction force. Pitch velocity was the most influential variable in both models. However, both models also revealed that pitching mechanics, including maximum humeral rotation velocity, shoulder abduction at foot strike, and maximum shoulder external rotation, significantly influenced both elbow and shoulder stress. Clinical Relevance: The results of this study can be used to inform players, coaches, and clinicians on specific mechanical variables that may be optimized to mitigate elbow or shoulder stress that could lead to throwing-related injury.
Effects of a Simulated Game and Doubleheader Inning on Peak Kinetics in Softball Pitching Across Pitch Types

Anthony W. Fava,Jessica L. Downs Talmage,Thomas van Hogerwou,Gretchen D. Oliver

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241278359

IF: 4.8

2024-10-02

The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:Softball pitchers frequently pitch at high volumes. Previous research has demonstrated changes in mechanics, range of motion, and perceived levels of fatigue and pain at high workloads. To date, little research has assessed changes in kinetics at high workloads across pitch types to understand the injury risk.Purpose:To examine changes in peak kinetics of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist of the pitching arm throughout a simulated game and doubleheader inning.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:A total of 19 high school softball pitchers (mean age, 15.1 ± 1.5 years; mean height, 1.6 ± 0.2 m; mean weight, 76.3 ± 16.9 kg) participated. Pitchers threw 4 innings of 25 randomly assigned pitches to mimic a game's high pitch count. Participants then rested for 30 minutes before subsequently proceeding to pitch the first inning of a doubleheader. Each pitcher threw a fastball, drop ball, curveball, and changeup. Peak shoulder, elbow, and wrist kinetics were compared across the first, last, and doubleheader innings and pitch types.Results:Compared with the first inning, significant decreases in kinetics were observed at the shoulder, elbow, and wrist in the last (P < .016) and doubleheader (P < .016) innings, particularly for shoulder and elbow compression force during the drop ball and curveball pitch types and wrist net force for all pitch types but the changeup. Significant decreases in elbow and wrist kinetics were observed during the changeup between the last and doubleheader innings (P < .016). Furthermore, differences in kinetics were observed between pitch types (P < .008); notably, the changeup had reduced kinetics compared with the fastball and breaking ball pitch types (drop ball, curveball) across innings.Conclusion:Across innings, attenuations in select joint kinetics of the pitching arm occurred that were specific to the pitch type. Across pitch types, peak kinetics was often greater during the fastball, while the changeup displayed the lowest peak kinetics.Clinical Relevance:The joints examined in this study are common sites of overuse injuries in pitchers. This work adds to previous findings on decrements in neuromuscular function as well as self-reported fatigue and pain with tournament-style pitching that may increase the injury risk. Collectively, these findings support developing a protocol combining functional testing and player-reported outcomes to aid sports specialists' decisions for pitchers to continue to pitch or return to play, which may help prevent musculoskeletal injuries and time loss from sports participation.

orthopedics,sport sciences
Analysis of the oligosaccharides on androgen-binding proteins: Implications concerning their role in structure/function relationships

B. J. Danzo,J. H. Black,B. Bell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-0760(91)90308-R

1991-12-31

Abstract:
Predicting the Presence of Pain in Youth Baseball Pitchers Using the Concept of Biomechanical Efficiency

Adam R. Nebel,Kevin A. Giordano,Nicole M. Bordelon,Gretchen D. Oliver

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241277596

IF: 2.6

2024-10-17

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 10, October 2024. Background:Increases in peak shoulder distraction force and peak elbow valgus torque may influence throwing-arm pain and injury risk in youth pitchers.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to determine whether shoulder distraction force and elbow valgus torque while accounting for anthropometrics and pitch velocity can predict the presence of pain in youth baseball pitchers. It was hypothesized that throwing-arm pain could be predicted using the concept of biomechanical efficiency, where a pitcher who is less efficient (having higher force or torque with the same pitch velocity) is more likely to experience pain.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:A total of 38 youth baseball pitchers (mean age, 13.3 ± 1.7 years) were divided into a pain group and pain-free group based on presence of throwing-arm pain as reported on a health history questionnaire. Each pitcher threw 3 maximal-effort fastballs to a catcher at regulation distance, and kinematics were measured using an electromagnetic motion-capture system (minimum 100 Hz). Height and weight as well as mean peak shoulder distraction force, peak elbow valgus torque, and pitch velocity across the 3 trials were evaluated. Logistic regression analyses determined whether shoulder distraction force or elbow valgus torque could predict the presence of throwing-arm pain when holding anthropometrics (body weight for shoulder distraction force; body weight and height for elbow valgus torque) and pitch velocity constant.Results:Shoulder distraction force significantly predicted the presence of throwing-arm pain after accounting for body weight and pitch velocity (χ2 = 9.49; P = .023). Specifically, for every 1-N increase in peak shoulder distraction force while holding body weight and pitch velocity constant, there was a 0.6% increased likelihood of experiencing throwing-arm pain. Elbow valgus torque could not predict the presence of pain when holding body weight, height, and pitch velocity constant.Conclusion:The models demonstrated that increases in peak shoulder distraction forces when holding pitch velocity and body weight constant increased a youth baseball pitcher's likelihood of experiencing throwing-arm pain. The study results support the concept of the biomechanical efficiency framework by offering evidence that maintaining pitch velocity with a lower joint load led to a lower likelihood of pain.Clinical Relevance:Results suggest that practicing efficient movement strategies can decrease the likelihood of experiencing throwing-arm pain while maintaining performance.

orthopedics,sport sciences
Changes in Elbow Stress and Ball Velocity During Reduced Effort Pitching: A Marker-Based Motion Capture Analysis

Anthony P Fiegen,Stuart P Nezlek,Stacy R Loushin,Dan Christoffer,Martijn Verhoeven,Kenton R Kaufman,Christopher L Camp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465221144020

Abstract:Background: Baseball pitchers often participate in throwing programs that involve throwing at reduced effort levels to gradually increase the amount of stress experienced across the elbow. It is currently unknown how reduced effort pitching compares with maximum effort with respect to elbow stress and ball velocity. Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose was to determine the correlation between elbow stress and ball velocity with reduced effort pitching. We hypothesized that decreased perceived effort would disproportionately correlate with elbow stress and ball velocity. Study design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Ten healthy male high school baseball pitchers threw 5 pitches from a regulation pitching mound at 3 effort levels: maximum effort, 75% effort, and 50% effort. Elbow stress, specifically elbow varus torque, was calculated for all pitches using a validated marker-based 3-dimensional motion capture system. Ball velocity was measured using a Doppler radar gun. Intrathrower variability was calculated for each effort level. Results: Elbow stress and ball velocity decreased with reduced effort throws (P < .001 and P = .003, respectively). However, the reductions in elbow stress and ball velocity were not proportional. At 75% effort throws, elbow stress measured 81% (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.95), and ball velocity measured 90% (ICC, 0.80) of maximum, respectively. At 50% effort throws, elbow stress measured 75% (ICC, 0.93), and ball velocity measured 85% (ICC, 0.87) of maximum. Intrathrower reliability was excellent for elbow stress and ball velocity, with all ICCs ≥0.80. Conclusion: Pitching at a reduced effort level resulted in decreased elbow stress and ball velocity. However, for every 25% reduction in perceived effort, elbow stress decreased by a mean 13%, and ball velocity decreased 7.5%. When baseball pitchers attempt to throw at a reduced effort of maximum, throwing metrics do not decrease proportionately. Clinical relevance: While pitching at a reduced effort of maximum decreases elbow stress and ball velocity, the decrease is not proportional, subjecting the elbow to more stress than intended. This has significant clinical importance to pitchers, coaches, and medical professionals in the setting of injury prevention and return to sports.
Youth Pitcher Fatigue: Medial Elbow Laxity, Ultrasonographic Assessment of Flexor-Pronator Mass Energy Depletion, and Association With Pitch Count

Manuel F. Schubert,Tariq M. Awan,Aaron D. Sciascia,Emily G. Figueroa,Jennifer M. DeMink,David M. Selak,Corey M. Snyder,Joel J. Gagnier,Michael T. Freehill

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241256294

IF: 2.6

2024-06-20

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 6, June 2024. Background:Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries in youth pitchers continue to be concerning despite the institution of pitch count limits. Flexor-pronator mass fatigue can lead to diminished dynamic stability, resulting in greater stress on the UCL.Purpose/Hypothesis:To evaluate fatigue of the flexor-pronator mass by assessing changes in medial elbow laxity; noninvasively characterizing alterations in muscle glycogen; and identifying changes in subjective fatigue, strength, range of motion (ROM), pitching velocity, and accuracy with increasing pitches thrown by youth pitchers to their recommended 75-pitch count limit. It was hypothesized that, with increased pitches, medial elbow laxity would increase and that the glycogen content of the flexor-pronator mass would decrease.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:Healthy male pitchers aged 10 years (n = 22) threw 3 sets of 25 pitches with 12 minutes between sets (3 timepoints). Bilateral ulnohumeral joint gapping was measured by applying a standardized valgus force and utilizing ultrasound imaging. Relative changes in muscle glycogen in the bilateral flexor carpi radialis (FCR), and the flexor digitorum superficialis/flexor carpi ulnaris (FDS/FCU) muscles were measured with ultrasound software and recorded as fuel percentiles. Additional measures obtained included subjective fatigue, strength, ROM, velocity, and accuracy.Results:There were no differences in medial elbow joint-line gapping between the throwing and nonthrowing arms or between timepoints. The throwing arm demonstrated a significant decline in fuel percentile of the FCR from baseline to after 75 pitches (P = .05). There were no differences across timepoints for FDS/FCU fuel percentile values. Fatigue measurements for both arms were significantly higher at all timepoints compared with baseline (P≤ .03). Grip strength of the dominant arm after 75 pitches was decreased significantly compared with after 25 pitches (P = .02).Conclusion:Although an increase in medial elbow joint gapping was not demonstrated within the recommended 75 pitch count limit in 10-year-olds, a relative decrease in glycogen stores of the flexor-pronator mass did occur, as well as a decrease in grip strength, with increasing subjective fatigue.Clinical Relevance:This study provides a foundation for further objective testing of physiologic changes that occur with pitching to better guide pitch count limits and improve the safety of young athletes.

orthopedics,sport sciences
Relationships Among Shoulder Rotational Strength, Range of Motion, Pitching Kinetics, and Pitch Velocity in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers

Janelle A Cross,Austin W Higgins,Cody C Dziuk,Gerald F Harris,William G Raasch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004246

2023-01-01

Abstract:Cross, JA, Higgins, AW, Dziuk, CC, Harris, GF, and Raasch, WG. Relationships among shoulder rotational strength, range of motion, pitching kinetics, and pitch velocity in collegiate baseball pitchers. J Strength Cond Res 37(1): 129-135, 2023-Throwing shoulder injuries are the most common type of injury experienced by baseball pitchers. Weakness in the shoulder musculature and insufficient throwing arm range of motion are both risk factors for developing a shoulder injury. The goal of this study was to determine correlations among shoulder rotational strength, range of motion, pitching kinetics, and pitch velocity in collegiate pitchers. Thirteen uninjured male college pitchers were evaluated. Clinical measures included shoulder internal and external rotation range of motion, peak isokinetic internal and external rotator strength, and peak isometric internal and external rotator strength. Three-dimensional biomechanics were assessed as subjects threw from an indoor pitching mound to a strike zone net at regulation distance. Pearson's correlations were used to assess the associations among the clinical measures and throwing metrics. Five significant correlations were found between peak shoulder compressive force and strength, and 4 significant correlations were found between pitching velocity and strength ( p < 0.05). No significant correlations were found between range of motion and pitching kinetics or velocity. Our results suggest that as shoulder rotational strength increases, the peak shoulder compressive force and pitch velocity both increase. Knowledge of relationships between strength metrics and pitching biomechanics may allow for improved strength training routines with the goal of increasing velocity without increasing injury risk.
DETERMINATION OF EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANTS AND MAXIMUM BINDING CAPACITIES IN COMPLEX IN VITRO SYSTEMS. I. THE MAMMILLARY SYSTEM.

H. Hart

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476471

1965-03-01

The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics

Abstract:
Localization of the rhotekin gene RTKN on the physical maps of mouse chromosome 6 and human chromosome 2p13 and exclusion as a candidate for mnd2 and LGMD2B.

W. Jang,J. S. Weber,E. B. Harkins,M. Meisler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/GENO.1996.4593

IF: 4.31

1997-03-15

Genomics

Abstract:
Evaluation of pedometry as a patient-centered outcome in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT): a comparison of pedometry and patient reports of symptoms, health, and quality of life

A. Bennett,B. Reeve,E. Basch,S. Mitchell,M. Meeneghan,C. Battaglini,A. Smith‐Ryan,Brett Phillips,T. Shea,W. Wood

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1179-0

2016-03-01

Quality of Life Research

Abstract:
Influence of Lead Knee Extension on Ball Velocity and Elbow Varus Torque in Professional and High School Baseball Pitchers

Brittany Dowling,Alexander Hodakowski,Christopher M. Brusalis,Micheal J. Luera,Calvin D. Smith,Nikhil N. Verma,Grant E. Garrigues

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241257539

IF: 2.6

2024-08-18

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 8, August 2024. Background:When the lead leg of a pitcher contacts the ground, the knee braces and then rapidly extends, initiating energy transfer to begin pelvis and trunk rotation.Purpose:To investigate the relationship of lead knee extension during the pitching delivery with peak lead knee extension velocity, ball velocity, and elbow varus torque in high school and professional pitchers.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:Data from 50 professional (PRO) and 50 high school (HS) pitcher groups were retrospectively analyzed. Pitchers threw 8 to 12 fastballs under 3-dimensional motion analysis (480 Hz). The groups were divided according to high or low lead knee extension: PRO-high (n = 18), PRO-low (n = 16), HS-high (n = 16), and HS-low (n = 17). Lead knee flexion, lead knee extension velocity, ball velocity, and elbow varus torque were analyzed between groups. Regression analyses were performed to quantify associations between lead knee extension and ball velocity and elbow varus torque for all pitchers.Results:At foot contact, all pitchers landed with similar knee flexion. PRO-high and HS-high pitchers had significantly greater lead knee extension through remaining pitching time points compared with the PRO-low and HS-low pitchers. PRO-high pitchers had faster ball velocity than PRO-low pitchers (39.8 ± 1.1 vs 39.3 ± 1.3 m/s, respectively), and HS-high pitchers had faster ball velocity than HS-low pitchers (34.1 ± 2.6 vs 31.2 ± 1.8 m/s, respectively) (P < .05). PRO-high pitchers had decreased elbow varus torque compared with PRO-low pitchers (85.3 ± 10.7 vs 95.4 ± 13.3 N·m, respectively); conversely, HS-high pitchers had greater elbow varus torque than HS-low pitchers (64.2 ± 14.7 vs 56.3 ± 12.2 N·m, respectively). For every 1° increase in lead knee extension, ball velocity increased by 0.47 m/s (P < .001) and elbow varus torque increased by 0.27 N·m (P = .025).Conclusion:Proper lead knee extension allowed efficient energy transfer through the kinetic chain to produce optimal ball velocity and minimize elbow varus torque in professional pitchers. Conversely, while proper lead knee extension improved ball velocity among high school pitchers, this did not minimize elbow varus torque.Clinical Relevance:Professional pitchers can extend their lead knee with minimal impact at the elbow. In high school pitchers, cognizance of proper full-body pitching mechanics remains a priority over increased velocity.

orthopedics,sport sciences

The importance of biochemistry in the medical curriculum.

Energy Flow during Baseball Machine Hitting

Energy flow in men's javelin throw and its relationship to joint load and performance

An Analysis of Intrapitch Variation in Joint and Segment Velocities With Throwing Arm Kinetics in High School and Professional Baseball Pitchers

A Comparison of Throwing Arm Kinetics and Ball Velocity in High School Pitchers With Overall Fast and Overall Slow Cumulative Joint and Segment Velocities

The Role of the Lead Hip in Collegiate Baseball Pitching: Implications for Ball Velocity and Upper-Extremity Joint Moments

Investigating the Influence of Modifiable Physical Measures on the Elbow Varus Torque – Ball Velocity Relationship in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers

Role of Pelvis and Trunk Biomechanics in Generating Ball Velocity in Baseball Pitching

Combined Countermovement Jump Testing and Motion Analysis as the Future of Performance Assessment for Baseball Pitchers: A Narrative Review

Machine Learning and Statistical Prediction of Pitching Arm Kinetics

Effects of a Simulated Game and Doubleheader Inning on Peak Kinetics in Softball Pitching Across Pitch Types

Analysis of the oligosaccharides on androgen-binding proteins: Implications concerning their role in structure/function relationships

Predicting the Presence of Pain in Youth Baseball Pitchers Using the Concept of Biomechanical Efficiency

Changes in Elbow Stress and Ball Velocity During Reduced Effort Pitching: A Marker-Based Motion Capture Analysis

Youth Pitcher Fatigue: Medial Elbow Laxity, Ultrasonographic Assessment of Flexor-Pronator Mass Energy Depletion, and Association With Pitch Count

Relationships Among Shoulder Rotational Strength, Range of Motion, Pitching Kinetics, and Pitch Velocity in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers

DETERMINATION OF EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANTS AND MAXIMUM BINDING CAPACITIES IN COMPLEX IN VITRO SYSTEMS. I. THE MAMMILLARY SYSTEM.

Localization of the rhotekin gene RTKN on the physical maps of mouse chromosome 6 and human chromosome 2p13 and exclusion as a candidate for mnd2 and LGMD2B.

Evaluation of pedometry as a patient-centered outcome in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT): a comparison of pedometry and patient reports of symptoms, health, and quality of life

Influence of Lead Knee Extension on Ball Velocity and Elbow Varus Torque in Professional and High School Baseball Pitchers