Abstract:BackgroundChromosome conformation capture studies suggest that eukaryotic genomes are organized into structures called topologically associating domains. The borders of these domains are highly enriched for architectural proteins with characterized roles in insulator function. However, a majority of architectural protein binding sites localize within topological domains, suggesting sites associated with domain borders represent a functionally different subclass of these regulatory elements. How topologically associating domains are established and what differentiates border-associated from non-border architectural protein binding sites remain unanswered questions.ResultsBy mapping the genome-wide target sites for several Drosophila architectural proteins, including previously uncharacterized profiles for TFIIIC and SMC-containing condensin complexes, we uncover an extensive pattern of colocalization in which architectural proteins establish dense clusters at the borders of topological domains. Reporter-based enhancer-blocking insulator activity as well as endogenous domain border strength scale with the occupancy level of architectural protein binding sites, suggesting co-binding by architectural proteins underlies the functional potential of these loci. Analyses in mouse and human stem cells suggest that clustering of architectural proteins is a general feature of genome organization, and conserved architectural protein binding sites may underlie the tissue-invariant nature of topologically associating domains observed in mammals.ConclusionsWe identify a spectrum of architectural protein occupancy that scales with the topological structure of chromosomes and the regulatory potential of these elements. Whereas high occupancy architectural protein binding sites associate with robust partitioning of topologically associating domains and robust insulator function, low occupancy sites appear reserved for gene-specific regulation within topological domains.

Selective interactions between diverse STEs organize the ANT-C Hox cluster

The insulator has sub-elements with different insulating and long-range pairing properties

Evolutionarily distinct and sperm-specific supersized chromatin loops are marked by Helitron transposons in Xenopus tropicalis

A general mechanism for enhancer-insulator pairing reveals heterogeneous dynamics in long-distant 3D gene regulation

A Scaffolding Element Rewires Local 3D Chromatin Architecture During Differentiation

Theoretical analysis of the role of chromatin interactions in long-range action of enhancers and insulators

CTCF Mediates Dosage and Sequence-context-dependent Transcriptional Insulation through Formation of Local Chromatin Domains

Members of an array of zinc finger proteins specify distinct Hox chromatin boundaries

[Combinatorial CRISPR inversions of CTCF sites in HOXD cluster reveal complex insulator function].

Insulator function and topological domain border strength scale with architectural protein occupancy

Serial Deletions of Tandem Reverse CTCF Sites Reveal Balanced HOXD Regulatory Landscape of Enhancers

Members of an array of zinc-finger proteins specify distinct Hox chromatin boundaries

Chromosome Structure II: Stem-loops and Circle-loops

A PRE loop at the dac locus acts as a topological chromatin structure that restricts and specifies enhancer–promoter communication

The three-dimensional architecture of Hox cluster silencing

CTCF mediates dosage- and sequence-context-dependent transcriptional insulation by forming local chromatin domains

CTCF-mediated chromatin loops enclose inducible gene regulatory domains

Chromosome structure in Drosophila is determined by boundary pairing not loop extrusion

Cohesin organizes 3D DNA contacts surrounding active enhancers in C. elegans

Stem-loop and circle-loop TADs generated by directional pairing of boundary elements have distinct physical and regulatory properties

Detailed in vivo characterization of the players and impact of individual loop extrusion trajectories