Abstract:BackgroundChromosome conformation capture studies suggest that eukaryotic genomes are organized into structures called topologically associating domains. The borders of these domains are highly enriched for architectural proteins with characterized roles in insulator function. However, a majority of architectural protein binding sites localize within topological domains, suggesting sites associated with domain borders represent a functionally different subclass of these regulatory elements. How topologically associating domains are established and what differentiates border-associated from non-border architectural protein binding sites remain unanswered questions.ResultsBy mapping the genome-wide target sites for several Drosophila architectural proteins, including previously uncharacterized profiles for TFIIIC and SMC-containing condensin complexes, we uncover an extensive pattern of colocalization in which architectural proteins establish dense clusters at the borders of topological domains. Reporter-based enhancer-blocking insulator activity as well as endogenous domain border strength scale with the occupancy level of architectural protein binding sites, suggesting co-binding by architectural proteins underlies the functional potential of these loci. Analyses in mouse and human stem cells suggest that clustering of architectural proteins is a general feature of genome organization, and conserved architectural protein binding sites may underlie the tissue-invariant nature of topologically associating domains observed in mammals.ConclusionsWe identify a spectrum of architectural protein occupancy that scales with the topological structure of chromosomes and the regulatory potential of these elements. Whereas high occupancy architectural protein binding sites associate with robust partitioning of topologically associating domains and robust insulator function, low occupancy sites appear reserved for gene-specific regulation within topological domains.

The insulator has sub-elements with different insulating and long-range pairing properties

Role of Insulators in Gene Regulation

CTCF mediates dosage- and sequence-context-dependent transcriptional insulation by forming local chromatin domains

A general mechanism for enhancer-insulator pairing reveals heterogeneous dynamics in long-distant 3D gene regulation

CTCF Mediates Dosage and Sequence-context-dependent Transcriptional Insulation through Formation of Local Chromatin Domains

Selective interactions between diverse STEs organize the ANT-C Hox cluster

Chromatin insulators: linking genome organization to cellular function

Insulator function and topological domain border strength scale with architectural protein occupancy

Functional Characterization of Insulation Effect for Synthetic Gene Circuits in Mammalian Cells.

the borders of H 3 K 27 me 3 domains CTCF tandemly aligns with other insulator proteins at Drosophila Material Supplemental

[Combinatorial CRISPR inversions of CTCF sites in HOXD cluster reveal complex insulator function].

Tandem CTCF sites function as insulators to balance spatial chromatin contacts and topological enhancer-promoter selection

Chromatin Domain Boundaries: Insulators and Beyond

Analysis of the H19ICR Insulator

CTCF DNA-binding Domain Undergoes Dynamic and Selective Protein–protein Interactions

Systematic discovery of directional regulatory motifs associated with human insulator sites

Rice RS2-9, which is bound by transcription factor OSH1, blocks enhancer-promoter interactions in plants

The zinc-finger protein Z4 cooperates with condensin II to regulate somatic chromosome pairing and 3D chromatin organization

Su(Hw) interacts with Combgap to establish long-range chromatin contacts

Influence of a CTCF-Dependent Insulator on Multiple Aspects of Enhancer-Mediated Chromatin Organization

Chromosome structure in Drosophila is determined by boundary pairing not loop extrusion