Abstract:Objective: Machine learning (ML) has been widely used to detect and evaluate major depressive disorder (MDD) using neuroimaging data, i.e., resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). However, the diagnostic efficiency is unknown. The aim of the study is to conduct an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ML based on rs-fMRI data for MDD. Methods: English databases were searched for relevant studies. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A random-effects meta-analytic model was implemented to investigate the diagnostic efficiency, including sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC). Regression meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were performed to investigate the cause of heterogeneity. Results: Thirty-one studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and AUC with 95% confidence intervals were 0.80 (0.75, 0.83), 0.83 (0.74, 0.82), 14.00 (9, 22.00), and 0.86 (0.83, 0.89), respectively. Substantial heterogeneity was observed among the studies included. The meta-regression showed that the leave-one-out cross-validation (loocv) (sensitivity: p < 0.01, specificity: p < 0.001), graph theory (sensitivity: p < 0.05, specificity: p < 0.01), n > 100 (sensitivity: p < 0.001, specificity: p < 0.001), simens equipment (sensitivity: p < 0.01, specificity: p < 0.001), 3.0T field strength (Sensitivity: p < 0.001, specificity: p = 0.04), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (sensitivity: p = 0.04, specificity: p = 0.06) might be the sources of heterogeneity. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed that the sample size ( n > 100: sensitivity: 0.71, specificity: 0.72, n < 100: sensitivity: 0.81, specificity: 0.79), the different levels of disease evaluated by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS/HAMD) (mild vs. moderate vs. severe: sensitivity: 0.52 vs. 0.86 vs. 0.89, specificity: 0.62 vs. 0.78 vs. 0.82, respectively), the depression scales in patients with comparable levels of severity. (BDI vs. HDRS/HAMD: sensitivity: 0.86 vs. 0.87, specificity: 0.78 vs. 0.80, respectively), and the features (graph vs. functional connectivity: sensitivity: 0.84 vs. 0.86, specificity: 0.76 vs. 0.78, respectively) selected might be the causes of heterogeneity. Conclusion: ML showed high accuracy for the automatic diagnosis of MDD. Future studies are warranted to promote the potential use of these classification algorithms in clinical settings.

Error Analysis of an Algorithm for Magnetic Compensation of Aircraft

Unveiling the Connection between Microbiota and Depressive Disorder through Machine Learning

A systematic review on the potential use of machine learning to classify major depressive disorder from healthy controls using resting state fMRI measures

Identification of Diagnostic Markers for Major Depressive Disorder Using Machine Learning Methods

Familial pancreatitis with lithiasis.

Classifying Major Depression Patients and Healthy Controls Using EEG, Eye Tracking and Galvanic Skin Response Data

A Systematic Evaluation of Machine Learning–Based Biomarkers for Major Depressive Disorder

Machine Learning on Early Diagnosis of Depression

Revealing patterns in major depressive disorder with machine learning and networks

Using Machine Learning to Predict Antidepressant Treatment Outcome from Electronic Health Records

Improving Conceptual Understanding and Representation Skills Through Excel-Based Modeling

Predicting treatment outcome in depression: an introduction into current concepts and challenges

Innovative Neuroimaging Biomarker Distinction of Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder through Structural Connectome Analysis and Machine Learning Models

Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder Using Machine Learning Based on Multisequence MRI Neuroimaging Features

From Connectivity to Controllability: Unraveling the Brain Biomarkers of Major Depressive Disorder

An insight into diagnosis of depression using machine learning techniques: a systematic review

Computational approaches to treatment response prediction in major depression using brain activity and behavioral data: A systematic review

Machine learning with electroencephalography features for precise diagnosis of depression subtypes

Probing the Clinical and Brain Structural Boundaries of Bipolar and Major Depressive Disorder

Ensemble Learning for Early‐Response Prediction of Antidepressant Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder

The diagnostic performance of machine learning based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data for major depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis