Lumpers and Splitters: Darwin, Hooker, and the Search for Order

J. Endersby

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165915

IF: 56.9

2009-12-11

Science

Abstract:An Odd Sort of Revolution Joseph Hooker was the director of the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew, London, when Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace were presenting their ideas about evolution by natural selection. Hooker was a good friend of Darwin's and an ardent ally of evolutionary thinking, who came to realize that natural selection would have little impact on the taxonomist's endeavor. Endersby (p. 1496) reviews taxonomic practice in the 19th century, arguing that the concept of evolution was almost a sideshow in the energetic debate about whether to group varieties into single species or whether to divide species into endless varieties. On the one hand, Hooker was a “lumper,” who found it hard to tolerate the thought of species constantly emerging, because it hindered his analysis of global patterns of species richness. On the other hand, Darwin's vision reconciled both modes of classification in revealing the genealogy of life on Earth. Classification was a key practice of the natural history sciences in the early 19th century, but leading taxonomists disagreed over basic matters, such as how many species the British flora contained. In this arena, the impact of Charles Darwin’s ideas was surprisingly limited. For taxonomists like Darwin’s friend, Joseph Dalton Hooker, the priority was to establish a reputation as a philosophical naturalist, and to do so Hooker embarked on a survey of global vegetation patterns. He believed that taxonomic “splitters” hindered his ambition to create natural laws for botany (and hence establish it as a prestigious science) by generating a multitude of redundant synonyms for every plant variety. Despite the fact that Darwin’s ideas apparently promised a justification for splitting, they also offered a philosophical justification for Hooker’s taxonomic practice, and so he enthusiastically championed his friend.