Micrometeorological effects and thermal-environmental benefits of cool pavements: Findings from a detailed observational field study in Pacoima, California

Haider Taha
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad2a8e
2024-02-20
Environmental Research Communications
Abstract:Cool pavements represent one of several strategies that can mitigate the effects of urban overheating by increasing albedo. By definition, this means increasing reflected and potentially re-absorbed short-wave radiation but also decreased surface and air temperatures and longwave upwelling, thus reducing radiant temperatures. So far, real-world studies have been inconclusive as to net effects from cool pavements. A project by GAF installed reflective pavements in Pacoima, California, in summer of 2022. This study set out to perform detailed, high spatiotemporal resolution, multi-platform observations to quantify micrometeorological benefits of the cool pavements and address concerns regarding glare, chemistry/air quality, and pedestrian thermal comfort. Results indicated large variability, as expected, but that the dominant effects were beneficial both in direct side-by-side, real-time comparisons (RT) between test and reference areas, as well as in difference-of-difference (DofD) to quantify local changes in test areas. During a heatwave in September 2022, maximum air-temperature differences (averaged over individual street segments) reached up to -1.9 °C RT in the afternoon. During non-heatwave, hot summer days, the largest street-segment-averaged afternoon air-temperature differences reached up to -1.4 °C RT or -2.8 °C DofD, and surface temperature up to -9.2 °C RT or -12.2 °C DofD. Whereas above values represent maximum effects, more typical street-segment averages also showed statistically significant benefits. In the afternoon, the mean of air-temperature differences was -0.2 °C RT and -1.2 °C DofD. The mean of surface-temperature differences was -2.6 °C RT and -4.9 °C DofD. Indicators of pedestrian thermal comfort also showed variability but predominantly a cooling effect. The mean of differences in mean radiant temperature was between -0.9 and -1.3 °C RT, and for physiological equivalent temperature, between -0.2 °C and -0.6 °C RT and -1.7 °C DofD. In terms of predicted mean vote, the mean of differences was -0.09 RT and -0.32 DofD.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?