Crystal Structure Complexity and Approximate Limits of Possible Crystal Structures Based on Symmetry-Normalized Volumes

Oliver Tschauner,Marko Bermanec

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17112618

IF: 3.4

2024-05-29

Materials

Abstract:Rules that control the arrangement of chemical species within crystalline arrays of different symmetry and structural complexity are of fundamental importance in geoscience, material science, physics, and chemistry. Here, the volume of crystal phases is normalized by their ionic volume and an algebraic index that is based on their space-group and crystal site symmetries. In correlation with the number of chemical formula units Z, the normalized volumes exhibit upper and lower limits of possible structures. A bottleneck of narrowing limits occurs for Z around 80 to 100, but the field of allowed crystalline configurations widens above 100 due to a change in the slope of the lower limit. For small Z, the highest count of structures is closer to the upper limit, but at large Z, most materials assume structures close to the lower limit. In particular, for large Z, the normalized volume provides rather narrow constraints for the prediction of novel crystalline phases. In addition, an index of higher and lower complexity of crystalline phases is derived from the normalized volume and tested against key criteria.

materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper investigates the complexity of crystal structures and the approximate limitations of possible crystal structures based on symmetrized volume normalization. In this study, the authors defined a standardized volume by relating the crystal unit cell volume to ionic radii and algebraic indices based on the symmetry of space groups and lattice positions. This standardized volume is then correlated with the chemical formula unit count Z to determine the upper and lower limits of possible crystal structures. They found that for larger Z values, most materials tend to approach the lower limit structure, while for smaller Z values, the structure is closer to the upper limit.

The paper also proposes a complexity index for crystal structure derived from this correlation, which does not directly reflect the actual crystal structure but is based on Wyckoff multiplicity, Z, and ionic radii. By statistically analyzing the point group distribution and complexity of different crystal structures, the researchers point out that existing statistical methods do not fully consider crystal complexity, while their method provides a more accurate range of possible structures.

By analyzing data from a range of minerals and compounds, the paper demonstrates how crystal volume, ionic radii, and symmetry indices are related to Z values and identifies the boundaries of possible crystal structures. These boundaries narrow for Z values approximately between 80 and 100, but expand again for Z values exceeding 100, indicating stricter volume predictions for materials with large Z values.

Furthermore, the researchers propose an index (I SG) for evaluating the complexity of crystal structures. This index reflects the number of atoms in different positions, symmetry, and occupancy in the structure, thereby distinguishing crystal structures with the same space group but different complexities.

In conclusion, this paper attempts to address the question of whether there exists a method to predict and constrain possible crystal structures based on the relationship between chemical composition, symmetry, and volume, as well as how to quantify and understand the complexity of crystal structures.