A Phase 1/2 Multicenter Randomized Trial of Local Ablation Plus Toripalimab Versus Toripalimab Alone for Previously Treated Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Chunhui Zhou,Yan Li,Jiaping Li,Botian Song,Hanfeng Li,Bin Liang,Shanzhi Gu,Haiping Li,Changyong Chen,Sai Li,Changli Peng,Fei Liu,Juxiong Xiao,Xueying Long,Ping Li,Zhengping Xiong,Xiaoping Yi,Weihua Liao,Liangrong Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0410
IF: 13.801
2023-05-26
Clinical Cancer Research
Abstract:Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of local ablation plus PD-1 inhibitor toripalimab in previously treated unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and Methods: In the multicenter, two-stage, and randomized phase 1/2 trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive toripalimab alone (240mg, every 3 weeks), subtotal local ablation followed by toripalimab starting on post-ablation day 3 (Schedule D3) or on post-ablation day 14 (Schedule D14). The first endpoint of stage 1 was to determine which combination schedule could continue and progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint for stage 1/2. Results: A total of 146 patients were recruited. During stage 1, Schedule D3 achieved numerically higher objective response rate than Schedule D14 for non-ablation lesions (37.5% versus 31.3%), and was chosen for stage 2 evaluation. For the entire cohort of both stages, patients with Schedule D3 had a significantly higher objective response rate than with toripalimab alone (33.8% versus 16.9%, P = 0.027). Moreover, patients with Schedule D3 had improved median PFS (7.1 months versus 3.8 months, P <0.001) and median overall survival (18.4 months versus 13.2 months, P = 0.005), as compared with toripalimab alone. In addition, six (9%) patients with toripalimab, 8 (12%) with Schedule D3, and 4 (25%) with Schedule D14 developed grade 3 or 4 adverse events, and one patient (2%) with Schedule D3 manifested grade 5 treatment-related pneumonitis. Conclusions: In patients with previously treated unresectable HCC, subtotal ablation plus toripalimab improved the clinical efficacy as compared with toripalimab alone with an acceptable safety profile.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?