Abstract:Speech disorders related to cleft lip and palate exhibit different degrees of involvement and can occur even after primary palate repair. Hypernasality can be present as a result of velopharyngeal insufficiency, as well as nasal emission, weak pressure, articulatory errors and facial grimace, affecting speech intelligibility. Palatoplasty outcomes can be variable, and among the influencing factors are the surgical technique, the surgeon's experience, the postoperative care, and the patient/cleft characteristics. The aim of this study was to correlate speech results after primary palate repair with surgical technique and cleft characteristics, using anthropometric measurements and speech assessment in patients diagnosed with cleft lip and palate. A longitudinal, retrospective study with patients who underwent primary palatoplasty between 2015 and 2019 and still attend Craniomaxillofacial Surgery Outpatient Clinic was conducted. Patients were operated on by a single surgeon using the intravelar technique veloplasty with maximal retropositioning of the soft palate elevator muscle. Patients who underwent primary palatoplasty after 2018 had the measurements before and immediately after palatoplasty recorded: length of palate, and the distances from cleft and uvula to posterior pharyngeal wall, and uvula to adenoid. Considering the total of 39 patients, 30 (76.9%) were male, with a mean age of 20.9 months (9–53 mo). All patients had their speech recorded between ages of 60 and 120 months. Speech samples were assessed by 3 different speech pathologists experienced in cleft speech, with an intrarater and inter-rater reliability >80%. The most frequent cleft type was unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (59%). One patient had mild hyponasality, 1 isolated obligatory disorder (nasal turbulence), and 3 patients presented compensatory articulation (2 isolated and 1 also presented obligatory disorder). Only 1 patient had marginal velopharyngeal insufficiency. Postoperatively, there was a mean increase in palate length from 5.4 to 5.6 cm, and a statistically significant decrease in the distance from the uvula to the pharynx wall, with a mean of 1.7 to 1.1 cm ( P <0.001). In general, patients analyzed did not have significant alterations in speech assessment, which did not allow further comparisons and correlation. Therefore, regardless of the anatomic characteristics of the palate, it is possible to achieve good results depending on the handling experience and the technique used.

"Long term speech outcomes after using the Sommerlad technique for primary palatoplasty: a retrospective study in the Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht."

A study of Sommerlad palatoplasty with the levator veli palatini retropositioning for isolated cleft palate repair

[Preliminary Study of Palatal Lengthening by Levator Veli Palatini Retropositioning According to Sommerlad Palatoplasty].

Sommerlad-Furlow Modified Palatoplasty: A Retrospective Study

The impact of surgical technique and cleft width on the rate of secondary surgery and velopharyngeal function in children with UCLP at 5 years of age

Comparison of Velopharyngeal Morphology of Two Palatoplasty Techniques in Patients with Hard and Soft Cleft Palate

Longitudinal Speech Outcome at 5 and 10 Years in UCLP: Influence of Speech Therapy and Secondary Velopharyngeal Surgery

Speech Outcomes After Primary Palatoplasty and Presurgical Cleft Characteristics: Is There a Predictive Association?

Evaluation of Postoperative Outcomes in Two Cleft Palate Repair Techniques without Relaxing Incisions

Evaluation of Postoperative Outcomes Following Early and Late Palate Repair: A Preclinical Study

The Sommerlad–Furlow Modified Palatoplasty Technique: Postoperative Complications and Implicating Factors

Analysis of Risk Factors for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency and Palatal Fistula After Sommerlad-Furlow Palatoplasty

Surgical Correction of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Cleft Palate Patients with Two Procedures of Reconstruction of Radical Intravelar Veloplasties (Ivvs)

The Square Flap Method for Cleft Palate Repair

Development of Postoperative Velopharyngeal Function in Patients with Cleft Palate.

Analysis of velopharyngeal morphology in operated cleft palate patients with levator veli palatini retropositioning according to Sommerlad]

Speech Outcome Audit for Cleft Lip and Palate Patient Population Correlated With Veau Cleft Type, Surgical Repair Technique, and Patient Age

Evaluation of Late Cleft Palate Repair by a Modified Technique Without Relaxing Incisions

[A Study on Lateral Incision after Palatoplasty with the Levator Veli Palatini Retropositioning According to Sommerlad].

The single Z-plasty for cleft palate repair: a preliminary report.

A Single Institution 19 Year Comparison of Furlow and Straight Line Palatoplasty Techniques in Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate