Electrophysiological Phenotype-Genotype Study of Sustained Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia in Inherited, High Arrhythmic Risk, Left Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Eva Cabrera-Borrego,Francisco J. Bermúdez-Jiménez,Alessio Gasperetti,Harikrishna S. Tandri,Pablo J. Sánchez-Millán,Manuel Molina-Lerma,Ivo Roca-Luque,Sara Vázquez-Calvo,Paolo Compagnucci,Michela Casella,Claudio Tondo,Petr Peichl,Giovani Peretto,Elena Paiotti,Ardan M Saguner,Pablo García-Pavía,Nerea Mora-Ayestarán,José M Larrañaga-Moreira,Pablo Fernández de-Aspe,Roberto Barriales-Villa,Carmen Muñoz-Esparza,Esther Zorio,Julia Martínez-Solé,Luis Lopes,Johanna B. Tonko,Pier Lambiase,Perry M. Elliott,Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero,Victoria Cañadas-Godoy,Sebastian Giacoman,Miguel Álvarez-López,Rosa Macías-Ruiz,W.J. McKenna,Luis Tercedor-Sánchez,Juan Jiménez-Jáimez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.124.013145
2024-11-30
Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Abstract:Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Ahead of Print. BACKGROUND:Among inherited cardiomyopathies involving the left ventricle, whether dilated or not, certain genotypes carry a well-established arrhythmic risk, notably manifested as sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT). Nonetheless, the precise localization and electrophysiological profile of this substrate remain undisclosed across different genotypes.METHODS:Patients diagnosed with cardiomyopathy and left ventricle involvement due to high-risk genetic variants and SMVT treated by electrophysiological study were recruited from 18 European/US centers. Electrophysiological study, imaging, and outcomes data after ablation were assessed in relation to genotype.RESULTS:Seventy-one patients were included (49.6 Q1–Q3 [40–60] years, 76% men). They were divided into 4 groups according to the affected protein: desmosomal (DSP,PKP2,DSG2, andDSC2), nuclear membrane (LMNAandTMEM43), cytoskeleton (FLNCandDES), and sarcoplasmic reticulum (PLN). Desmosomal genes,TMEM43, andPLNwere associated with biventricular disease, while variants inLMNAand cytoskeleton genes had predominant left ventricle involvement (P=0.001). The location of the clinical-SMVT substrate was significantly different based on genotype (P=0.005).DSPand cytoskeleton genes presented SMVTs with right bundle branch block morphology, which origin was identified in the inferolateral segments of the left ventricle. The other desmosomal genes (PKP2andDSG2), along withTMEM43, showed SMVTs with left bundle branch block morphology and predominantly right ventricular substrate. In contrast,LMNAsubstrate was mainly observed in the interventricular septum. During a median of 26 Q1–Q3 (10.6–65) months, 27% of patients experienced recurrences of clinical SMVT with differences between genotypes (log-rank 0.016). Nuclear membrane genes demonstrated the highest recurrence rate compared with desmosomal genes (hazard ratio, 4.56 [95% CI, 1.5–13.8]).CONCLUSIONS:The anatomic substrate of SMVTs shows a strong correlation with the underlying genotype, electrocardiographic morphology, and recurrence rate. Particularly, patients with nuclear membrane gene variants have a significantly higher recurrence rate compared with those with desmosomal gene variants.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?