Role of arrhythmic phenotype in prognostic stratification and management of dilated cardiomyopathy

Martina Setti,Marco Merlo,Marta Gigli,Laura Munaretto,Alessia Paldino,Davide Stolfo,Carola Pio Loco,Kristen Medo,Caterina Gregorio,Antonio De Luca,Sharon Graw,Matteo Castrichini,Antonio Cannatà,Flavio Luciano Ribichini,Matteo Dal Ferro,Matthew Taylor,Gianfranco Sinagra,Luisa Mestroni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3168

2024-02-28

European Journal of Heart Failure

Abstract:Dilated cardiomyopathy with arrhythmic phenotype. AR, arrhythmogenic; CI, confidence interval; CIF, cumulative incidence function; ECG, electrocardiogram; FLNC, filamin C; LMNA, lamin; MVA, major ventricular arrhythmia; NSVT, non‐sustained ventricular tachycardia; RBM20, RNA binding motif 20; RMTL, restricted mean time lost; SCD, sudden cardiac death. Aims Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with arrhythmic phenotype combines phenotypical aspects of DCM and predisposition to ventricular arrhythmias, typical of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. The definition of DCM with arrhythmic phenotype is not universally accepted, leading to uncertainty in the identification of high‐risk patients. This study aimed to assess the prognostic impact of arrhythmic phenotype in risk stratification and the correlation of arrhythmic markers with high‐risk arrhythmogenic gene variants in DCM patients. Methods and results In this multicentre study, DCM patients with available genetic testing were analysed. The following arrhythmic markers, present at baseline or within 1 year of enrolment, were tested: unexplained syncope, rapid non‐sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), ≥1000 premature ventricular contractions/24 h or ≥50 ventricular couplets/24 h. LMNA, FLNC, RBM20, and desmosomal pathogenic or likely pathogenic gene variants were considered high‐risk arrhythmogenic genes. The study endpoint was a composite of sudden cardiac death and major ventricular arrhythmias (SCD/MVA). We studied 742 DCM patients (45 ± 14 years, 34% female, 410 [55%] with left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <35%). During a median follow‐up of 6 years (interquartile range 1.6–12.1), unexplained syncope and NSVT were the only arrhythmic markers associated with SCD/MVA, and the combination of the two markers carried a significant additive risk of SCD/MVA, incremental to LVEF and New York Heart Association class. The probability of identifying an arrhythmogenic genotype rose from 8% to 30% if both early syncope and NSVT were present. Conclusion In DCM patients, the combination of early detected NSVT and unexplained syncope increases the risk of life‐threatening arrhythmic outcomes and can aid the identification of carriers of malignant arrhythmogenic genotypes.

cardiac & cardiovascular systems