Pulsed low dose rate radiation to mitigate tumor-permissive responses in pancreatic cancer-associated fibroblasts: Introducing the HOST-factor.

Edna Cukierman,Janusz Franco-Barraza,Tiffany Luong,Kristopher Raghavan,Jessica Karen Wong,Debora Barbosa Vendramini Costa,Ralph Francescone,Jaye C. Gardiner,Sanjay S. Reddy,Elizabeth A. Handorf,Joshua E. Meyer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.3_suppl.682
IF: 45.3
2024-01-23
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:682 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) features a distinctive tumor microenvironment comprising cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and their self-produced extracellular matrix (ECM), forming functional CAF units (CAF u). The current total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), involving conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT), yields suboptimal responses while promoting a tumor-permissive CAF u state. To address this, we explored pulsed low dose rate radiation (PLDR)-based TNT, as an alternative to CRT, to treat three-dimensional in vivo-like human PDAC CAF u cultures. We assessed gemcitabine combined with PLDR versus CRT using theHOST Factor, a “harmonized output of stroma traits” factor, comprising several established CAF u functional indicators, which inform on the functional status of the PDAC microenvironment. Methods: The unique CAF u functional values used corresponded to: i) ECM anisotropy; ii) persistent cell-ECM signaling; iii) sustained cytokine-induced activation; iv) cytoskeletal bundling; and v) systemic features of fibroblastic activation. The validity of the resultant HOST factor was assessed using the unit’s ECM ability to elicit fibroblastic activation, indicated by a high αSMA/F-actin ratio value. Results: Ex-vivo CRT led to a HOST factor that was 2-fold greater than chemotherapy alone (p=0.6), which was functionally gauged as a tumor-permissive CAF u. In contrast, PLDR averted CRT-induced tumor-permissive response and established a 6-fold lower HOST factor, suggestive of a “normalized” CAF u, when compared to the HOST factor value established when using conventional TNT (P=0.0016 vs. CRT, and P= 0.0086 vs. gemcitabine alone). The multi-parameter HOST factor validity was confirmed as CRT treated CAF u’s ECM activated human pancreatic fibroblasts (αSMA/F-actin = 70% ± 29) while PLDR-treated CAF u's ECM failed to do so (αSMA/F-actin = 32% ± 26), reaching a 30% mean rank difference (P <0.0001). Conclusions: PLDR mitigates conventional CRT-based TNT-induced tumor-permissive responses, restoring the fibroblastic units' tumor-suppressive function. These results lend support to a phase 1 trial designed to evaluate whether radiation with PLDR-based TNT, constitutes a safe and more effective treatment for PDAC patients. The novel HOST factor is being used to appraise specimens from NCT04452357.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?