Clinical impact of C-reactive protein flare response in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received pembrolizumab.

Ikko Tomisaki,Mirii Harada,Akinori Minato,Katsuyoshi Higashijima,Tomohisa Takaba,Yujiro Nagata,Kenichi Harada,Naohiro Fujimoto
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.634
IF: 45.3
2024-01-31
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:634 Background: C-reactive protein (CRP) has been reported as one of the useful predictive markers in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). Not only baseline revel, kinetics of CRP during medical treatment also has been demonstrated. However, there are extremely limited data on temporary elevated CRP levels followed by decreasing below baseline (CRP flare response) after administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical significance of CRP flare response after administering pembrolizumab in patients with advanced UC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced UC who consecutively received pembrolizumab as second-line or later therapy between March 2018 and January 2023 at one academic center and six general hospitals. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to early CRP kinetics: flare-responder (CRP levels had increased to more than double from baseline within 1 month after pembrolizumab administration (CRP flare) and decreasing to below-baseline levels within 3 months); responder (CRP levels decreased ≥30% from baseline within 3 months without CRP flare); non-responder (the remaining patients). Tumor responses, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were compared among the groups. Results: A total of 97 eligible patients, 15, 25, and 57 patients were classified into flare-responder, responder, and non-responder group, respectively. Objective response rates of flare-responder (43%) and responder (52%) were higher than that of non-responder groups (17%). Median follow-up was 7.8 months. Progression and death were observed in 83 and 70 patients during follow-up, respectively. Median OS was 19.8, 15.2, and 7.8 months in the flare-responder, responder, and non-responder group, respectively (P= 0.03). Furthermore, Median PFS was 8.1, 6.3, and 2.7 months in the flare-responder, responder, and non-responder group, respectively (P= 0.006). In multivariate analysis, CRP-flare response was a significant favorable predictive factor associated with OS. The patients who developed any grade AEs were 33, 40, 20.7% in the flare-responder, responder, and non-responder group, respectively (P= 0.16). Similarly there were no significant differences in occurrence of severe AEs (≥Grade 3). Conclusions: CRP flare response was observed in 15% of patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab and favorable oncological outcomes were observed in these patients. CRP-flare might be a promising predictive and prognostic marker in patients with advanced UC who underwent pembrolizumab therapy.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?