Abstract:Background Healthcare professionals require many personal attributes in addition to cognitive abilities and psychomotor skills for competent practice. Multiple Mini- Interviews are being employed globally to assess personality attributes of candidates for selection in health professions education at all level of entry; these attributes are namely, communication skills, critical thinking, honesty, responsibility, health advocacy, empathy and sanctity of life. Considering the high stakes involved for students, faculty, institutions and the society, rigorous quality assurance mechanisms similar to those used for student assessment must be employed for student selection, throughout the continuum of medical education. It is a difficult undertaking as these psychological constructs are difficult to define and measure. Though considered to yield reliable and valid scores, studies providing multiple evidences of internal structure especially dimensionality of Multiple Mini-Interviews are sparse giving rise to questions if they are measuring a single or multiple constructs and even if they are measuring what they are purported to be measuring. Objective The main objective is to provide statistical support of the multi-dimensional nature of our Multiple Mini Interviews, hypothesized a -priori , through CFA. Another objective is to provide multiple evidences for the internal structure. Our study highlights the link between content and internal structure evidences of the constructs, thus establishing that our Multiple Mini Interviews measure what they were intended to measure. Method After securing permission from the Institutional review board, an a-priori seven factor-model was hypothesized based on the attributes considered most essential for the graduating student of the institution. After operationally defining the attributes through extensive literature search, scenarios were constructed to assess them. A 5-point rating scale was used to rate each item on the station. A total 259 students participated in the multiple mini interviews over a period of three days. A training workshop had been arranged for the participating faculty. Results The reliability coefficient using Cronbach’s alpha were calculated (range from 0.73 to 0.94), Standard Error of Measurement (ranged from 0.80 to1.64), and item to station-total correlation ranged from 0.43–0.50 to 0.75–0.83. Inter-station correlation was also determined. Confirmatory factor analysis endorsed the results of Exploratory factor analysis in the study revealing a seven model fit with multiple indices of Goodness-of-fit statistics such as Root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) value 0.05, Standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) value with less than 0.08. All these indices showed that model fit is good. The Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the multi-dimensional nature of our MMIs and also confirmed that our stations measured the attributes that they were supposed to measure. Conclusion This study adds to the validity evidence of Multiple Mini-Interviews, in selection of candidates, with required personality traits for healthcare profession. It provides the evidence for the multi-dimensional structure of Multiple Mini interviews administered with multiple evidences for its internal structure and demonstrates the independence of different constructs being measured.

An evaluation of the multiple mini-interview as a selection tool for dental students

Multiple Mini Interview as an admission tool in higher education: Insights from a systematic review

Evidence regarding the utility of multiple mini-interview (MMI) for selection to undergraduate health programs: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 37

Feasibility of an automated interview grounded in multiple mini interview (MMI) methodology for selection into the health professions: an international multimethod evaluation

Residency Applicant Perceptions of Multiple Mini Interviews in Post-Graduate Year 1 Residency Interviews

Reviewing assessment strategies in European dental schools

Investigating the internal structure of multiple mini interviews—A perspective from Pakistan

Multimodal teaching methods for students in dentistry: a replacement for traditional teaching or a valuable addition? A three-year prospective cohort study

Peer evaluation as an alternative assessment method for case presentations: A cross‐sectional study of dental students' perception

Could situational judgement tests be used for selection into dental foundation training?

Clinical Evaluation of Maxillary Arch Complete Denture Impressions Made by Undergraduate Students in a Dental College

Factors Influencing the Selection of Dentistry as a Career Among Prospective Candidates: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study

Development of a dynamic clinical assessment for finals

Use of situational judgment tests for assessing non-cognitive attributes of final year dental students

Formative key feature examinations as innovative teaching approach in dental education: A project report

Assessment of Confidence Level Among Interns of A Dental College in Performing Various Dental Procedures

Instant Messaging in Dental Education

Undergraduate dental students’ perspective on the implementation of digital dentistry in the preclinical curriculum: a questionnaire survey

Navigating the assessment landscape: Dental students' perceptions of extended‐matching questions versus single‐correct answers

Does dental appearance affect employment prospects: a prospective cross-sectional study

Comparison of undergraduate dental students' academic performance using structured and unstructured oral examinations