Abstract:Background: The promise of real-world evidence and the learning health care system primarily depends on access to high-quality data. Despite widespread awareness of the prevalence and potential impacts of poor data quality (DQ), best practices for its assessment and improvement are unknown. Objective: This review aims to investigate how existing research studies define, assess, and improve the quality of structured real-world health care data. Methods: A systematic literature search of studies in the English language was implemented in the Embase and PubMed databases to select studies that specifically aimed to measure and improve the quality of structured real-world data within any clinical setting. The time frame for the analysis was from January 1945 to June 2023. We standardized DQ concepts according to the Data Management Association (DAMA) DQ framework to enable comparison between studies. After screening and filtering by 2 independent authors, we identified 39 relevant articles reporting DQ improvement initiatives. Results: The studies were characterized by considerable heterogeneity in settings and approaches to DQ assessment and improvement. Affiliated institutions were from 18 different countries and 18 different health domains. DQ assessment methods were largely manual and targeted completeness and 1 other DQ dimension. Use of DQ frameworks was limited to the Weiskopf and Weng (3/6, 50%) or Kahn harmonized model (3/6, 50%). Use of standardized methodologies to design and implement quality improvement was lacking, but mainly included plan-do-study-act (PDSA) or define-measure-analyze-improve-control (DMAIC) cycles. Most studies reported DQ improvements using multiple interventions, which included either DQ reporting and personalized feedback (24/39, 61%), IT-related solutions (21/39, 54%), training (17/39, 44%), improvements in workflows (5/39, 13%), or data cleaning (3/39, 8%). Most studies reported improvements in DQ through a combination of these interventions. Statistical methods were used to determine significance of treatment effect (22/39, 56% times), but only 1 study implemented a randomized controlled study design. Variability in study designs, approaches to delivering interventions, and reporting DQ changes hindered a robust meta-analysis of treatment effects. Conclusions: There is an urgent need for standardized guidelines in DQ improvement research to enable comparison and effective synthesis of lessons learned. Frameworks such as PDSA learning cycles and the DAMA DQ framework can facilitate this unmet need. In addition, DQ improvement studies can also benefit from prioritizing root cause analysis of DQ issues to ensure the most appropriate intervention is implemented, thereby ensuring long-term, sustainable improvement. Despite the rise in DQ improvement studies in the last decade, significant heterogeneity in methodologies and reporting remains a challenge. Adopting standardized frameworks for DQ assessment, analysis, and improvement can enhance the effectiveness, comparability, and generalizability of DQ improvement initiatives.

A Comprehensive Framework of Role Data Governance in Ensuring Data Quality: Literature Review

The Influence Factors of Data Governance Implementation: Study in Indonesian Public University

Data governance, data literacy and the management of data quality

Data governance: A conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda

Big Data Quality: A systematic literature review and future research directions

Data Quality Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities

Frameworks, Dimensions, Definitions of Aspects, and Assessment Methods for the Appraisal of Quality of Health Data for Secondary Use: Comprehensive Overview of Reviews

Big data quality framework: a holistic approach to continuous quality management

One Size Does Not Fit All---A Contingency Approach to Data Governance

Coordinating Decision-Making in Data Management Activities: A Systematic Review of Data Governance Principles

Healthcare Data Governance, Privacy, and Security -- A Conceptual Framework

Defining and Improving Data Quality in Medical Registries: A Literature Review, Case Study, and Generic Framework

Data Quality-Driven Improvement in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review

Implementation of Data Governance on the Open Government Data Management Platform to Improve Data Quality

A systematic literature review of data literacy education

A framework for analysis of data quality research

Centering complexity in ‘educators’ data literacy’ to support future practices in faculty development: a systematic review of the literature

Designing Data Governance Structure: An Organizational Perspective

Bringing in the technological, ethical, educational and social-structural for a new education data governance

Development of a framework to assess the quality of data sources in healthcare settings

Architecting Data Quality for Continuous Student Behaviour Management